Ion-Dipole Correction and CWBSol
- f Integration Equation Theory of Liquid
Siqin CAO
Department of Chemistry The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
May 25, 2020
Ion-Dipole Correction and CWBSol of Integration Equation Theory of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Ion-Dipole Correction and CWBSol of Integration Equation Theory of Liquid Siqin CAO Department of Chemistry The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology May 25, 2020 Integration Equation Theory of Liquid with Ion-Dipole Correction
Department of Chemistry The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
May 25, 2020
Denis Bucher, Pieter Stouten, Nicolas Triballeau, J. Chem. Inf. Model 58, 692−699 (2018) Takashi Imai, Koji Oda, Andriy Kovalenko, Fumio Hirata, Akinori Kidera, JACS 131, 12430–12440 (2009)
water around 1d5q
ij (ri, rj) = ρiρjgij(ri, rj)
hij(rij) = cij(rij) + ∑
k
cik(rik) * (hkj(rkj) + skj(rkj)) ≈ cij(rij) + ∑
k
cik(rik) * (hkj(rkj) + skj(rkj)) ln gij = −vij+hij − cij+Bij
1 5 2 3 4 r (Å)
NH+
3
NH+
2
1 2 5 r (Å)
PLHNC MD
5TXD 5TJ1
r (Å) 5 1 2 3 5 5 5 4 1 2 3 5 5 5 5
around 5TXD
Cl−
O−
5TXD 5TJ1
KH PSE2 PSE3 PLHNC MD
Sketches from khanacademy.org
1 r (Å) 5 3 5 7 Water around a negative charge group 1 5 2 4 3 r (Å) Water around a positive charge group
In IET, both are treated in mean-field way: ∫ cH(r′ )ρb
HhHO(|r′ − r|)d3r′
= ℱ−1[cH(k)hHO(|k|)]
H-bond was modeled with an explicit potential function, the General hydrogen bond function, in the last century:
[1] A. T. Hagler, S. Lifson, and P . Dauber, JACS 101, 5122 (1979) [2] F . A. Momany, R. F . McGuire, A. W. Burgess, and . A. Scheraga, J. Phys. Chem. 79, 2361 (1975) [3] Wendy D. Cornell, ..., Peter A. Kollman, JACS 117, 5179 (1995) [4] Garret Vanderkool, J. Phys. Chem. 87, 5121-5129 (1983) [5] Felcy Fabiola, Richard Bertram, Andrei Korostelev, and Michael S. Chapman, Protein Sci. 11: 1415–1423 (2002) (DOI 10.1110/ps.4890102)
General hydrogen bond used to be available in AMBER Now, people believe H-Bond is resulted from electric interactions. Therefore: (1) H-bond interaction is short range; (2) The nature of H-bond interaction is electric interaction
O
αO (r) ≈ ⟨pOH ⋅ EO⟩ ≈
Implementation:
αO(r) + ΔvIDC αO (r) → vnew αO (r)
bOH rαH rαO
KH PSE2 PSE3 PLHNC MD
5TXD Original With IDC
r (Å) 1 2 3 5 5 5 5 1 2 3 5 5 5 5 4 4
Cl−
r (Å)
GLU . O−
1 2 3 5 5 5 5
1 2 3 KH PSE2 PSE3 5 5 5 5
Original With correction
PLHNC MD
5TJ1
DT . O−
Original With correction
r (Å) 1 2 3 5 5 5 5 1 2 3 5 5 5 5
6JCD
KH PSE2 PSE3 PLHNC MD
Ring 1 Ring 2 Ring 1 Ring 2 |------- Close -------| |------- Open -------|
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 Open Rings Close Rings Open Rings Close Rings |----- Ring 1 ------||--------------- Ring 2 ---------------| |----- Ring 1 ------||--------------- Ring 2 ---------------|
231ARG 230ILE 63GLU 65LYS 44PHE 2ALA 255GLU 226LYS 63GLU 65LYS 44PHE 2ALA 231ARG 230ILE 63GLU 65LYS 44PHE 2ALA 255GLU 226LYS 63GLU 65LYS 44PHE 2ALA
3DRISM-KH 3DRISM-PSE2-IDC MD
r (nm)
ΔμKH = ∑
αγ ∫ [−cαγ(r) − 1
2 cαγ(r)hαγ(r) + 1 2 hαγ(r)2Θ(−hαγ(r))] ρb
γ d3r
ΔμS = ΔμKH + aV + b ΔμKH = ∫ dλ ⟨ ∂uIDC ∂λ ⟩ = ∫ dλ ⟨ ∂uuv ∂λ ⟩ + ∫ dλ ⟨ ∂ΔuIDC ∂λ ⟩
∫ dλ ⟨ ∂ΔuIDC ∂λ ⟩ ≈ LJorig − LJIDC 2
10
10
FEP (kcal/mol) IET (kcal/mol)
〇 Straightforward UC with PSE2-IDC 〇 3DRISM-PSE2-UC with IDC
r MUE RMSE
kcal/mol
Straight 0.9705 1.8 2.5 LR 0.9859 1.2 1.7 r MUE RMSE
kcal/mol
GF-UC 0.9884 0.7 1.1 KH-UC 0.9955 0.6 1.0 PSE2-UC 0.9950 0.6 1.0
10
10
FEP (kcal/mol) IET (kcal/mol)
╳ 3DRISM-KH-GF-UC 〇 3DRISM-KH-UC
php -S 127.0.0.1:8080 -t path_of_CWBSol
Linux with PHP 5+ and GCC 4+ MacOS 10.9+ with PHP 5+ Windows with WSL or Cygwin Client: Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Edge
(Internet Explorer not supported)
(need ImageMagick and GNUPLOT)
Do calculation: Watch the calculation: See the results: If troubles encountered:
5TXD 5TJ1 6JCD Chaperon MD AMBER RISMHI3D 1 100 10000
Efficiency 285 105 802 120715 Atom Number:
1000 10