Investor Presentation November 11, 2016 Disclaimer Forward-Looking - - PDF document

investor presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investor Presentation November 11, 2016 Disclaimer Forward-Looking - - PDF document

1 Investor Presentation November 11, 2016 Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Investor Presentation

November 11, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Disclaimer

Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Statements that are not strictly historical statements constitute forward-looking statements and may often, but not always, be identified by the use of such words such as “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “potential,” “possible,” or “probable” or statements that certain actions, events or results “may,” “will,” “should,” or “could” be taken, occur or be achieved. The forward-looking statements include statements about the expected benefits of the proposed Transaction to Earthstone and its stockholders, the anticipated completion of the proposed Transaction or the timing thereof, the expected future reserves, production, financial position, business strategy, revenues, earnings, costs, capital expenditures and debt levels of the combined company, and plans and objectives of management for future operations. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and analyses made by Earthstone and its management in light of experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform to expectations is subject to a number of material risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: the ability to obtain stockholder and regulatory approvals of the proposed Transaction; the ability to complete the proposed Transaction on anticipated terms and timetable; Earthstone’s ability to integrate its combined operations successfully after the Transaction and achieve anticipated benefits from it; the possibility that various closing conditions for the Transaction may not be satisfied or waived; risks relating to any unforeseen liabilities of Earthstone or Bold; declines in oil, natural gas liquids or natural gas prices; the level of success in exploration, development and production activities; adverse weather conditions that may negatively impact development or production activities; the timing of exploration and development expenditures; inaccuracies of reserve estimates or assumptions underlying them; revisions to reserve estimates as a result of changes in commodity prices; impacts to financial statements as a result of impairment write-downs; risks related to level of indebtedness and periodic redeterminations of the borrowing base under Earthstone’s credit agreement; Earthstone’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet the internally funded portion of its capital expenditures budget; Earthstone’s ability to obtain external capital to finance exploration and development operations and acquisitions; the ability to successfully complete any potential asset dispositions and the risks related thereto; the impacts of hedging on results of operations; uninsured or underinsured losses resulting from oil and natural gas operations; Earthstone’s ability to replace oil and natural gas reserves; and any loss of senior management or technical personnel. Earthstone’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, recent current reports on Form 8-K, and other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings discuss some of the important risk factors identified that may affect Earthstone’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. Earthstone and Bold undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements except as required by law.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Disclaimer (Cont’d)

Additional Information About the Proposed Transaction This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of a vote or proxy. In connection with the proposed Transaction, Earthstone will file with the SEC and mail to its security holders a proxy statement and other relevant documents. WE URGE INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE, BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT EARTHSTONE AND THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION. Investors and security holders will be able to obtain these materials (when they are available) and other documents filed with the SEC free of charge at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. In addition, a copy of the proxy statement (when it becomes available) may be obtained free of charge from Earthstone’s website at www.earthstoneenergy.com. Investors and security holders may also read and copy any reports, statements and other information filed by Earthstone, with the SEC, at the SEC public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 or visit the SEC’s website for further information on its public reference room. In addition, the documents filed with the SEC by Earthstone can be obtained free of charge from Earthstone’s website at www.earthstoneenergy.com or by contacting Earthstone by mail at 1400 Woodloch Forest Drive, Suite 300, The Woodlands, TX, 77380, or by telephone at 281-298-4246. Participants in the Solicitation Earthstone and its directors, executive officers and certain other members of management and employees may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies in respect of the proposed Transaction. Information regarding Earthstone’s directors and executive officers is available in its proxy statement filed with the SEC by Earthstone on October 4, 2016 in connection with its 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. Other information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation and a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be contained in the proxy statement and other relevant materials to be filed with the SEC when they become available. This presentation shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy any securities, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Investment Highlights

Prudently Managed Balance Sheet

 Adequate liquidity and cash flow to fund near-term capital plans  Simple and unburdened capital structure  Managing through downturn with an under-leveraged balance sheet  Traditional reserve-based credit facility with standard covenants

Proven Management Team

 Four prior successful public entities  Operational excellence  Repeat institutional and high net worth investors  Market recognition from investors and sellside research analysts

Diversified Shale Play Exposure with Growing Inventory

 Presence in the most prolific, domestic oil-bearing shale plays— Midland Basin, Eagle Ford, and Bakken / Three Forks  Actively growing in the Midland Basin via acquisition of Lynden Energy Corp. and announced combination with Bold Energy III LLC  Growth through drill bit and significant acquisitions  ~1,200 total gross drilling locations across core plays  Upside from down-spacing and other formations

Visible Production Growth & Drilling Program with Substantial Optionality

 Midland Basin wells-in-progress and Eagle Ford DUC inventory provides ability to ramp up production quickly  Majority of acreage in key areas is HBP

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Track Record

2001 – 2004 AROC, Inc. (Private) Gulf Coast, Permian Basin, Mid-Con. Preferred investors – 17% IRR Initial investors – 4x return 2005 – 2007 Southern Bay Energy, LLC (Private) Gulf Coast, Permian Basin Initial investors – 40% IRR 1997 – 2001 Texoil, Inc. (“TXLI”) Gulf Coast, Permian Basin Preferred investors – 2.5x return Follow-on investors – 3x return Initial investors – 10x return 1992 – 1996 Hampton Resources Corp. (“HPTR”) Gulf Coast Preferred investors – 30% IRR Initial investors – 7x return

  • Management team has consistently created shareholder value

‐ Repeated success with multiple entities over 20+ years ‐ Results have created long-term and recurring shareholders ‐ Extensive industry and financial relationships ‐ Technical and operational excellence

  • Multi-basin experience
  • Resource & conventional expertise
  • Complex Gulf Coast drilling & horizontal resource proficiency
  • Efficient and low-cost operator
  • Proven acquisition and exploitation results

2007 – 2012 GeoResources, Inc. (“GEOI”) Eagle Ford, Bakken / Three Forks, Gulf Coast Initial investors – 35% IRR Initial investors – 4.8x return Initial Southern Bay investors achieved a combined 7.4x ROI upon the merger with GeoResources and subsequent sale in 2012

Note: “Initial investors” refers to (i) in the case of private entities, investors that participated in the initial capitalization or recapitalization of the entity at the time a change in management occurred, or (ii) in the case of public entities, public shareholders existing at the date the transaction was announced to the public. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Management

  • Strong management and technical team with demonstrated ability and prior success
  • Equity investors—interests are clearly aligned with shareholders

Years of Experience Years Working Together Responsibility

Frank Lodzinski 44 26 President and CEO Robert Anderson 30 12 Corporate Development and Reservoir Engineering Steve Collins 28 20 Completions and Operations Chris Cottrell 33 18 Land and Marketing Tim Merrifield 37 15 Geological and Geophysical Francis Mury 42 26 Drilling and Development Ray Singleton 38 1 Operations and A&D, Northern Region Neil Cohen 13 4 Finance Bret Wonson 15 6 Accounting

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

662 1,146 2,833 3,414 Q3 2014 Oct 2016 ESTE Production (Boepd) Midland Basin Eagle Ford Bakken/Other 7,393

Earthstone – A Platform for Steady Growth

December 2014 Q2/Q3 2015 Private Sellers Eagle Ford Karnes, Gonzales, Fayette Counties, TX December 2014 Strategic Combination Eagle Ford Operator Q2 2016 Midland Basin 5,883 Net Acres Howard, Glasscock Counties, TX

  • Since December 2014, Earthstone has evolved from a micro cap, non-op Bakken / Three Forks

company to a small cap, multi-basin operator with meaningful exposure to the Midland Basin and Eagle Ford

Resource Expansion

November 2014 Bakken / Three Forks 622 Boepd1 Q1 20172 Midland Basin Eagle Ford Bakken / Three Forks 7,393 Boepd3

Notes: 1 Daily production for the three month period ended September 30, 2014 2 Expected closing of Q1 2017 3 Earthstone and Bold combined production for October 2016 (Earthstone – 5,073 Boepd; Bold – 2,320 Boepd)

Q1 20172 Midland Basin 20,900 Net Acres Reagan, Upton, Midland Counties, TX

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Note: Please see Assumptions and Disclosures page

Company Overview

Asset Location

  • The Woodlands, Texas based E&P company focused on domestic

exploration and production of oil and natural gas with current

  • perations primarily in the Midland Basin, Eagle Ford trend, and

Bakken / Three Forks

  • Strategy of growing through the drill bit, organic leasing, and

attractive corporate and asset acquisitions

  • Current combined production of 7,393 Boepd (63% oil), inclusive of

Lynden and Bold acquisitions

  • In May 2016, Earthstone closed its acquisition of Lynden Energy
  • Corp. and established its initial presence in the Midland Basin

‐ Current production of 1,100 Boepd (48% oil) ‐ 5,883 net acres in Howard, Glasscock, Midland, and Martin Counties ‐ 195 gross locations; 40% working interest

  • In November 2016, Earthstone announced a combination transaction

with Bold Energy III LLC – Current production of 2,320 (63% oil) – 20,900 net acres predominantly in Reagan, Upton, and Midland Counties – 500+ gross locations; 99% operated; 85% working interest

Market Statistics (as of November 4, 2016)

Shares Outstanding: 22.3mm Share Price: $8.49 Market Cap: $189.2mm Enterprise Value: $180.1mm

Bakken / Three Forks Eagle Ford Midland Basin

Combined Production Summary

October 2016 Net Production: 7,393 Boepd Midland Basin, 3,414 Eagle Ford, 2,833 Bakken / Other, 1,146

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Key Areas

Total

Net Production (Boepd) 7,393 % Oil 63% Gross Producing Wells 546 Core Net Acres 51,300 Core Gross Drilling Locations 1,200

Bakken/Other3

Net Production (Boepd) 1,146 % Oil 57% Gross Producing Wells 258 Core Net Acres 5,900 Core Gross Drilling Locations 250

Eagle Ford2

Net Production (Boepd) 2,833 % Oil 70% Gross Producing Wells 150 Core Net Acres 18,600 Core Gross Drilling Locations 235

Midland Basin1

Net Production (Boepd) 3,414 % Oil 58% Gross Producing Wells 138 Core Net Acres 26,800 Core Gross Drilling Locations 715

Note: 1 Midland Basin totals include contribution from pending transaction with Bold Energy III LLC 2 Eagle Ford totals Include contribution from Austin Chalk properties 3 Bakken totals include contribution from conventional properties located in ND, MT, WY, TX, and OK

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Combination with Bold Energy

Transformational Transaction in the Midland Basin

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 Acreage Legend Bold Operated Bold Non‐Operated

Operated Position in Core Midland Basin

85% working interest in 20,900 net acres

Current Net Production of 2,320 Boepd

(63% oil, 84% liquids)

10 wells in progress drive immediate production growth

Attractive Rates of Returns1

Single well IRRs of 25-100% and inventory of 500+ Hz locations

Position Delineated In Multiple Benches

Strong offset results in the Wolfcamp A and B

Combined Teams with Track Records

Proven technical execution and operational expertise

Completion Evolution Sets Stage for Further Well Performance Improvement

Bold Provides a Strategic Operated Position in the Midland Basin

Note: 1 Single well returns based on strip prices as of October 31, 2016

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Significant Oil in Place Across the Position

  • Reagan County Wolfcamp

‐ Thickest Wolfcamp shale section in Midland Basin; greatest oil in place

  • Bold current Reagan/Upton inventory

‐ 1 Wolfcamp A target ‐ 2 Wolfcamp B targets

  • 7 viable target benches tested or

developed by industry ‐ 2 Wolfcamp A targets ‐ 3 Wolfcamp B targets ‐ 1 Wolfcamp C target ‐ 1 Cline target

  • Offset operators have developed five

benches in a stacked “wine rack” pattern ‐ 2 Wolfcamp A targets ‐ 3 Wolfcamp B targets

  • Thermal maturity places Bold acreage in
  • il window with low GOR’s

‐ Average 80 % Liquids, 20% Gas

  • Shallower TVD than northern end of

Midland Basin ‐ D&C costs are lower

Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B

Legend (MMbo/Section)

30 20 10 70 60 50 40 30 20 10

Legend (MMbo/Section) Bold Operated Acreage Bold Non‐Operated Acreage

Source; Bold Energy

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

High Quality Pay Across Multiple Zones

Reagan County Type Section

Dean Wolfcamp Upper B Wolfcamp Lower B Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp C Cline Primary Bold Targets Prospective Targets1

North Midland Central Reagan

Dean Wolfcamp A Wolfcamp B Wolfcamp C Cline

Wolfcamp A Thickness increases 50-100’ from Midland to Reagan County. OIP increases from ~20 MMBO/sec to 35-45 MMBO/sec. Wolfcamp B Thickness increases 250-300’ from Midland to Reagan County. OIP increases from ~50 MMBO/sec to 70-80 MMBO/sec. Wolfcamp C Bench is much thicker in Reagan

  • County. OIP is 20-30 MMBO/sec

in the Upper C.

Reagan Co. Resource Greater than Midland Co.

Source; Bold Energy Note: 1 Prospective targets tested in offset wells by other operators

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Excellent Well Results Surround the Position

Parsley Char Hughes #7H Wolfcamp Lower B IP30/1000’: 161 Boe/d Permian Resources Woods RE 210 #27HA Wolfcamp Upper B IP30/1000’: 247 Boe/d Permian Resources Hickman 1 223 #2HA Wolfcamp Upper B IP30/1000’: 101 Boe/d Permian Resources University 10 RE #616HS Wolfcamp A IP30/1000’: 124 Boe/d Permian Resources Loftin Hughes 13-1212 #1H Wolfcamp A IP30/1000’: 215 Boe/d Bold (BTA) Texaco-Coates A U1 #1HM Wolfcamp Upper B IP30/1000’: 95 Boe/d Callon Turner AR Unit B # 8HK Wolfcamp Lower B IP30/1000’: 169 Boe/d Pioneer University 3-19 #30H Wolfcamp A IP30/1000’: 151 Boe/d Bold Bold Hartgrove 22 #1HM Wolfcamp Upper B IP30/1000’: 136 Boe/d Parsley Bast 33-40 4412H Wolfcamp Lower B IP30/1000’: 122 Boe/d Bold Bold Hamman 30 #1HM Wolfcamp Lower B IP30/1000’: 268 Boe/d

Wolfcamp Upper B Wolfcamp Lower B Wolfcamp A Bold Working Interest Well

Permian Resources Chico 56HS Wolfcamp A IP30/1000’: 153 Boe/d Bold (BTA) Texaco-Coates A U2 #1HU Wolfcamp A IP30/1000’: 58 Boe/d

Source: Drillinginfo. Horizontal wells with first production since January 1, 2014. Excludes wells where lateral length is not available.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Type Curve Summary Gross HZ Drill‐Compl‐Equip EUR % % IRR Area Inventory ($mm) (MBoe) Oil NGL Strip2 $60.00 / $3.00 Midland 51 5.9 1,000 65 20 76 100

  • W. Reagan/ Upton

80 5.9 850 68 17 32 41 Central Reagan 230 5.4 800 56 25 29 38 SE Reagan 137 5.4 700 71 15 26 33

  • Repeatable well results 1 generate attractive returns at current strip 2
  • Industrywide completion evolution leading to enhanced productivity
  • Tighter stage spacing and higher proppant loading yielding further improvement

Reagan and Upton Well Performance

50 100 150 200 250 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 CUMULATIVE PRODUCTION, MBOE (2 STREAM) TIME, MONTHS

  • W. Reagan‐Upton Results

HARTGROVE 22 (2 Well Avg.) HAMMAN‐UPTON 30 #1HM

50 100 150 200 250 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 CUMULATIVE PRODUCTION, MBOE (2 STREAM) TIME, MONTHS

Central Reagan Results

TCAU 1 #1HM TCAU 2 #1HU PE ‐ Char Hughes (4405H) ‐ 42‐383‐39528

50 100 150 200 250 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 CUMULATIVE PRODUCTION, MBOE (2 STREAM) TIME, MONTHS

SE Reagan Results

Permian Resources ‐ Hickman RE 1 223 (02HA) ‐ 42‐383‐39461 Permian Resources ‐ Tucker RE 194 (22HA) ‐ 42‐383‐39526

1000 MBOE 1000 MBOE 1000 MBOE 850 MBOE 700 MBOE 850 MBOE 700 MBOE 850 MBOE 700 MBOE Notes: 1 Well results normalized to 7,500 feet lateral lengths. Note: TCAU wells are 8,500 feet early Gen III Completions. 2 Strip prices as of October 31, 2016

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

Prod Days

Midland and Upton Results(1)

1 MMBOE Type Curve MS 40‐1HM HM 45‐1HM Mid Co Upton 30‐1HM

Gen IV Gen III

Generational Completion Improvement

  • Bold has begun testing a Gen IV

completion in Upton and Midland counties. The evolution

  • f

completion design in the Midland Basin has been toward increasing the stimulated rock volume through increased stimulation intensity.

  • Bold has seen encouraging results

in our recent Midland and Upton completions.

  • The Gen IV completion is now

being applied in Central Reagan County with results expected by YE-2016.

  • With further consistent results from

the Gen IV completion in Reagan County, as well as Upton and Midland counties, we expect to increase our type curve reserve parameters in 2017.

Cumulative Production (BOE)(1) Completion Design

lbs/ft bbls/ft STG Spacing Clusters BPM

Gen III 1750 36 190 4 82 Gen IV 2230 51 165 6 94

Note: 1 Two-Stream results and type curve. Well results normalized to 7,500 feet lateral length.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Current Production 2016 YE Production 2017 YE Production

Bold Net Production (Boepd)

Attractive Production Growth from Ongoing Drilling

  • One rig running with two wells flowing back, one well completing, six wells waiting on completion.
  • Expect to run one to two rigs in 2017 to grow Bold asset production 200% to 400%
  • Upcoming capex guidance to be issued

2 Rigs

2,640 2,320 7,120 11,570

1 Rig

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Combined Company – Core Midland Basin Presence

Acreage Legend Earthstone Bold

MARTIN HOWARD GLASSCOCK MIDLAND REAGAN UPTON

Operated Position in Core Midland Basin

75% working interest in 26,800 net acres

Combined Company Current Net Production of 7,400 Boepd

(62% oil, 76% liquids)

11 wells in progress drive immediate production growth

Attractive Rates of Returns1

Single well IRRs of 25-100% and inventory of 700+ Hz locations

Liquidity and Low Leverage to Facilitate 2017 Capital Program

Combined $24.0mm of cash on-hand, $17.0mm drawn on $102.0mm borrowing base2

EASTERN SHELF CENTRAL BASIN PLATFORM Notes: 1 Single well returns based on strip prices as of October 31, 2016 2 Financial statistics as of September 30, 2016

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Asset Overview

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Midland Basin Asset Overview

  • Strong offsetting operator results in Lower Spraberry,

Wolfcamp A, B and D (Cline)

  • Additional upside in 4+ separate horizons
  • Horizontal activity on the Company’s acreage

– 2 producing horizontal Wolfcamp wells in Glasscock County – Horizontal Wolfcamp well in Howard County with first production expected in November 2016

  • Near-Term Strategy

– Establish operating presence through acquisition of

  • perated production

– Grow production organically and through acquisitions – Expand acreage and location inventory

Glasscock, Howard, Martin and Midland Counties, Texas

County Gross Acres Net Interest (%) Net Acres Martin

1,757 43.750 769 1,127 20.000 225

Midland

640 43.750 280

Glasscock

4,480 43.750 1,960

Howard

6,121 40.625 2,487 640 25.390 162

Total: 14,765 5,883 2016 Horizontal Drilling Company Acreage

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

  • 6,761 gross / 2,649 net acres prospective for the Wolfcamp

– Leasehold interest of 25% to 41%

  • First horizontal well with first production expected November

2016

  • Increasing horizontal well activity by other operators in

Howard County – Offset by Encana and Oxy

  • Contiguous acreage block allows for efficient layout of long

laterals

Midland Basin – Howard County

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Company Acreage

Operator Well Name First Production Date Peak Month (Boepd) Cumulative Production (MBoe) % Oil Lateral Length (Feet) Oxy Morris Grantham 2602WA 1/2016 695 41 75% 7,200 Oxy Patterson 2707WA 8/2015 802 111 89% 9,150 Oxy Patterson 2702WA 7/2015 938 157 83% 9,375 Oxy May A 1108WA 11/2015 859 105 89% 9,377 Oxy May 1105WA 10/2015 606 76 94% 8,777 Oxy May 1102 1WA 4/2015 1,092 198 83% 7,575 Encana Tubb 39 5H 7/2014 1,164 164 88% 6,705 CrownQuest Tubb A 1HA First Production November 2016 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Note: Production data through March 2016 per Drilling Info

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Midland Basin – Glasscock County

  • 4,480 gross / 1,960 net acres prospective for the Wolfcamp

– Leasehold interest of ~44%

  • Earthstone’s first two horizontal Wolfcamp wells in Glasscock

County were drilled during June and July 2015 – Mallard 23 #1H well

  • Lateral length of 6,953 feet, 35 frac stages
  • Gross production for the first 60 days averaged 505 Boepd

(91% oil) – McDaniel 2413 #1H

  • Lateral length of 9,703 feet, 48 frac stages
  • Gross production for the first 60 days averaged 600 Boepd

(91% oil)

  • Contiguous acreage block allows for efficient layout of long laterals

Operator Well Name First Production Date Peak Month (Boepd) Cumulative Production (MBoe) % Oil Lateral Length (Feet) Diamondback Riley C 1807 1WB 2/2016 1,001 52 85% 7,756 Encana Clark 1 1201H 9/2015 757 116 90% 9,747 Encana Clark 1 1202H 9/2015 729 111 91% 9,668 Energen Cole Ranch 35 307H 8/2015 920 155 77% 9,407 Energen Cole Ranch 35 107H 8/2015 920 154 78% 9,668 CrownQuest Mallard 23 1H 8/2015 620 79 83% 6,953 CrownQuest McDaniel 2413 1H 9/2015 652 95 85% 9,703 Energen Daniel SN 7-6 504H 11/2015 828 86 83% 9,896

Note: Production data through March 2016 per Drilling Info

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Company Acreage

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Eagle Ford Asset Overview

  • Operated Fayette, Gonzales, and Karnes Counties

– 38,000 gross / 18,600 net leasehold acres – Working interests range from 33% to 50% – 60% held-by-production

  • 79 gross / 34.9 net producing wells (74 operated / 5

non-op)

  • Approximately 230 identified gross Eagle Ford drilling

locations

  • Majority of acreage covered by 173 square mile 3-D

seismic shoot – Avoid faulting for steering Eagle Ford wells – Indicate natural fractures – Delineate other prospective opportunities

  • Other Potential: Upper Eagle Ford, Austin Chalk,

Buda, Wilcox, and Edwards

  • Non-operated La Salle County

– 61 gross producing wells – 25,400 gross / 2,900 net leasehold acres – Working interests range from 10% to 15%

  • Near-Term Strategy

– Production growth through operated capital program – Expand through acquisitions of operated acreage and production

Gonzales, Fayette and Karnes Counties, Texas

Earthstone Sanchez Penn Virginia

Offset operators include EOG, Encana and Marathon

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24 $606 $310 $287 19% 17% 2% 4% 2% 4%

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700

September 2014 Utilizing 7,500 PSI Rig Directional Drilling / Drilling Optimization Rentals Fluids Cement Casing Cost YE 2015 Current Market Pricing

Drilling Cost per Foot of Lateral ($)

Eagle Ford Drilling Cost Improvements

  • Since September 2014, drilling costs have decreased over 50% from $606 per foot of lateral to $287 per

foot

  • Normalized for drilling a 7,000 foot lateral:

‐ In 2014, the Company incurred ~$4.2mm of drilling costs ‐ Currently, the Company incurs ~$2.0mm of drilling costs

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Eagle Ford Drilling Performance – Days vs Depth

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Depth (ft MD) Days

Unit Average Comparison Fayette / Gonzales County

Earthstone Operating

Days vs. Depth Newtonville North Unit ‐ OV Hope Unit Richards / Murphy North Unit Rumley Unit Matthews South Unit Matthews North Unit Boggs Unit

Run Surface Casing Build Curve Run 5‐1/2" Production Casing

Non X Rig Wells X37 EF Wells

Boggs Matthews North Matthews South

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26 $162,500 17% 4% 3% 1% 11% $105,000

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000

Total Completion Cost November 2014 Pressure Pumping Electric Line Coiled Tubing Rentals Other Services Current

Completion Cost per Stage ($)

Eagle Ford Completion Cost Improvements

  • Since November 2014, completion costs have decreased ~35% from $162,500 per stage to $105,000 per

stage

  • Currently testing slick water fracs
slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Bakken / Three Forks Asset Overview

  • 5,900 net core acres predominantly in McKenzie and Dunn

Counties of North Dakota that are prospective for the Bakken / Three Forks formation

  • 151 gross wells producing

– Average working interest of ~4% – 19 gross wells currently being drilled or completed

  • ~250 potential gross drilling locations
  • Primary operators include: Statoil, Oasis,

ConocoPhillips/Burlington, Continental, ExxonMobil/XTO, Marathon, SM Energy

  • Majority of units in McKenzie County, ND

– Banks Field

  • Largest development area
  • Interest in 22 spacing units
  • Operators down-spacing to 6-7 wells per unit in the

Bakken / Three Forks – Indian Hill Field

  • Near-Term Strategy

– Expand acreage – Acquire production – Establish operating presence

Non‐Op Leasehold Operated Leasehold

Primary assets are located in McKenzie County, North Dakota

Note: Please see Assumptions and Disclosures page

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Financial Overview

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Revolver Borrowing Base 75.0 Less: Revolver Outstandings 10.0 Plus: Cash and Equivalents 23.8 Liquidity 88.8 ($mm) 9/30/2016 Cash and Equivalents 23.8 Revolver Outstandings 10.0 Other Debt 4.7 Total Debt 14.7 Total Shareholders' Equity 287.8 Total Capitalization 302.5

Capital Structure and Liquidity

Capitalization Liquidity

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

135,000 420,000 270,000 2016 Q4 2017 Full Year 2018 Full Year

$49.35 $48.86 $50.70

300,000 1,560,000 600,000 2016 Q4 2017 Full Year 2018 Full Year

$2.604 $2.946 $2.907

Oil Production Hedged (Bbls; $/Bbl) Gas Production Hedged (MMBtu; $/MMBtu)

Hedging Summary

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Analyst Coverage

Firm Analyst Daniel Katzenberg / (646) 557‐3209 dkatzenberg@rwbaird.com Steve Berman / (212) 849‐3944 sberman@canaccordgenuity.com Joel Musante, CFA / (800) 727‐7922 ext: 144 jmusante@europac.net Chad Mabry / (832) 319‐2520 cmabry@fbr.com Welles Fitzpatrick / (504) 584‐1235 welles@jrco.com Jeff Grampp / (949) 600‐4150 jgrampp@northlandcapitalmarkets.com John M. White / (949) 720‐7115 jwhite@roth.com Mike Kelly, CFA / (713) 658‐6302 mkelly@seaportglobal.com John Aschenbeck / (713) 658‐6343 jaschenbeck@seaportglobal.com Ben Wyatt / (817) 900‐5714 ben.wyatt@stephens.com Neal Dingmann / (713) 247‐9000 neal.dingmann@suntrust.com Jason Wangler / (713) 403‐3985 jwangler@wundernet.com SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Wunderlich Securities Johnson Rice & Co. Northland Capital Markets Roth Capital Partners Seaport Global Securities Stephens Robert W. Baird & Co. Canaccord Genuity Euro Pacific Capital FBR Capital Markets

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Frank Lodzinski President and CEO Robert Anderson EVP, Corporate Development and Engineering Neil Cohen VP, Finance, and Treasurer Corporate Headquarters Houston 1400 Woodloch Forest Drive | Suite 300 | The Woodlands, TX 77380 | (281) 298-4246 Denver 633 17th Street | Suite 2320 | Denver, CO 80202 | (303) 296-3076 Website www.earthstoneenergy.com

Contact Information