Investigating the Influence of a Coupled Formulation on Journal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

investigating the influence of a coupled formulation on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Investigating the Influence of a Coupled Formulation on Journal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Investigating the Influence of a Coupled Formulation on Journal Bearing Models Student: Jacq Crous Supervisor: Stephan Heyns Co-Supervisor: Jaco Dirker Context of Study Rotor-Bearing-Seal System: This study was concerned with the bearing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Investigating the Influence of a Coupled Formulation on Journal Bearing Models

Student: Jacq Crous Supervisor: Stephan Heyns Co-Supervisor: Jaco Dirker

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Context of Study – Rotor-Bearing-Seal System:

This study was concerned with the bearing models.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Context of Study – Bearing:

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Context of Study:

Condition based monitoring Effective analysis of the available data Realistic models

  • In order to monitor the condition of steam turbines in real time we need to use

the available information more effectively.

  • This requires the development of a complete, realistic model of the rotor-bearing

system.

  • Armand Kruger is working on the rotor model and my study was concerned with

the bearing models.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Issue:

Multi-Grade Oil

Polymer additives Solvent: Mineral Oil

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fluid Models:

Viscoelastic Formulation Viscous Formulation

  • Fluid motion is modelled by the Cauchy

equation of motion (neglecting body forces):

̅ ̅ ∙ ̅ ∙ ̿

  • Density of the fluid.

̅ - Velocity field.

  • Pressure field.
  • Extra-stress tensor.
  • Fluid behaviour modelled by a

generalized Navier-Stokes Formulation:

̅ ̅ ∙ ̅ ∙ ̅ ̅

  • Density of the fluid.

̅ - Velocity field.

  • Pressure field.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 The first law of thermodynamics in differential form, for

incompressible fluids, is used to model the heat transfer:

  • ̅ ∙

: ̅ ∙

  • heat capacity of fluid.

k - Thermal conductivity of the fluid.

  • Cauchy stress tensor

Heat Transfer:

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Numerical Solvers:

 OpenFOAM was used to develop the numerical solvers.  OpenFOAM is a C++ library that provides various

interpolation schemes as well as algebraic solvers.

 OpenFOAM solves PDEs and can give tensor, vector

and scalar fields as outputs.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Coupling of Fluid Formulations:

Viscoelastic Formulation Viscous Formulation

Velocity Field Temperature Field Viscosity Dependencies

Velocity Field Temperature Field Polymer Stress Field Viscosity Dependencies

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Solvers Developed:

Viscoelastic Formulation

Giesekus Fluid

Oldroyd-B Fluid

Viscous Formulation

Viscous Fluid Stokes Flow

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Driving Forces for the Flow:

Shearing of Oil

Rotating Journal

Simulation of a full scale journal bearing would require 5 10 control volumes!

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Alternative Approach

 A section of the bearing is extracted form the converging

section of the bearing.

 The extracted section has the same driving forces in the

same measure as the corresponding point in the bearing.

Oil Journal

Converging section

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Weak Coupling - Viscous Formulation:

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 20 40 60 80

R/C V [m/s]

Velocity Profiles

Coupled Stokes Formulation Coupled Viscous Formulation Uncoupled Viscous Formulation Classical Formulation 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

∆ R/c

Difference between formulations

Coupled Stokes Formulation Coupled Viscous Formulation Uncoupled Viscous Formulation

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Weak Coupling – Viscoelastic Formulation:

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 20 40 60 80 100

R/c V [m/s]

Velocity Profiles

Coupled Giesekus Coupled Oldroyd-B Classic Formulation 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

∆ R/c

Difference between formulations

Coupled Oldroyd-B Coupled Giesekus

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Strong Coupling – Viscous Formulation:

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 50 100 150 200

R/c V [m/s]

Velocity Profiles

Coupled Stokes Formulation Coupled Viscous Formulation Uncoupled viscous formulation Classical Formulation 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

∆ R/c

Difference between formulations

Coupled Stokes Formulation Coupled Viscous Formulation Uncoupled Viscous formulation

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Strong Coupling – Viscoelastic Formulation:

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 20 40 60 80 100 120

Velocity Profiles

Strong Coupled Formulation (Giesekus) Weaker Coupled Formulations (Oldroyd-B) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Difference between formulations

Strong Coupled Formulation (Giesekus) Weaker Coupled Formulation (Oldroyd-B)

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conclusion:

 The coupling, whether weak or strong, was seen to

significantly affect the fluid behaviour.

 The Strong coupling was seen, in particular, to change

the nature of the flow behaviour by departing form the classical formulation in a non-homogeneous way.

 A coupled formulation is vitally important to accurately

model large scale journal bearings!

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Questions?

18