Introduction to Quantum Information (C7.4) Consultation Session #3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

introduction to quantum information c7 4
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Introduction to Quantum Information (C7.4) Consultation Session #3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction to Quantum Information (C7.4) Consultation Session #3 Thursday 21 May 2020 Tutor: Dr J. Mur-Petit Outline Classical communication checks Messages: Check www.arturekert.com/quantum for Lecture notes Examinable


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction to Quantum Information (C7.4)

Consultation Session #3 Thursday 21 May 2020 Tutor: Dr J. Mur-Petit

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Classical communication checks
  • Messages:

– Check www.arturekert.com/quantum for

  • Lecture notes
  • Examinable syllabus

– Exam: Tuesday 9 June 14:30 -> check changes at:

http://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/exams/timetables

  • Questions pre-submitted

– 2018 Q1 (quantum algorithms) – 2017 Q1f (quantum error correction) – 2018 Q2a-d (stabiliser formalism) – 2019 Q2e (quantum algorithms / quantum circuits) – 2019 Q3e (CPTP maps)

  • Closing remarks: Last consult. session: Fri 28th 17:00 BST
slide-3
SLIDE 3

2018 Q1 (q. algorithms)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2018 Q1

(a) See lecture notes “quantum algorithms” -> phase kick-back. Interpretation: reflection in subspace

  • rthogonal to all |x> such that f(x) = 1

Reflection in subspace

  • rthogonal to U|a>
  • HnV0Hn = reflection in subspace orthog. to Hn|0> ;

Uf = reflection in subsp. orthog. to |s> ;  G = rotation in subsp. spanned by Hn|0> and |s>

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2018 Q1

► More details: J. Watrous https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~watrous/CPSC519/LectureNotes/12.pdf

  • HnV0Hn = reflection in subspace orthog. to Hn|0> ;

Uf = reflection in subsp. orthog. to |s> ;  G = rotation in subsp. spanned by Hn|0> and |s>

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2018 Q1

We have that i.e., span { |ψg>, |ψb>} = span{Q|ψg>, Q|ψb>}, and the subspace is invariant under Q.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Using and trigonometric identities, we get From here, it’s easy to show that

2018 Q1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

NP describes the class of problems that are difficult to solve but easy to verify. It does matter here that the problem is in NP for it can be efficiently verified by Uf.

2018 Q1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2017 Q1 f (Q.E.C.)

  • Errors are unrecoverable if there is more than one error in

each cluster of three qubits.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2017 Q1 f (Q.E.C.)

X

  • Errors are unrecoverable if there is more than one error in

each cluster of three qubits.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2017 Q1 f (Q.E.C.)

X X X

  • Errors are unrecoverable if there is more than one error in

each cluster of three qubits.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2017 Q1 f (Q.E.C.)

X X X X X

  • Errors are unrecoverable if there is more than one error in

each cluster of three qubits.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2017 Q1 f (Q.E.C.)

X X X X X X X X

  • Errors are unrecoverable if there is more than one error in

each cluster of three qubits.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2017 Q1 f (Q.E.C.)

  • Errors are unrecoverable if there is more than one error in

each cluster of three qubits. X X X X X X X X X X

► More info: Ch. 10 in Kay, Laflamme & Mosca, “An introduction to quantum information” (OUP, 2017)

  • -> e-book available at the Bodleian/SOLO
slide-15
SLIDE 15

2018 Q2 a-d

→Q. 4.3(7) (sheet 4)

→Q. 4.3(10) →Q. 4.3(2)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2018 Q2 a-d

Definition: Separable

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2018 Q2 a-d

Definition: Separable

► More info: Hillery et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2019 Q2 e (q. algorithms)

See Q. 3.8 (sheet 3)

ρ ψ

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2019 Q2 e

See Q. 3.8 (sheet 3)

ψ ρ

What reduced density matrix describes state of auxiliary system? Think it like this:

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2019 Q3 e (CPTP maps)

Start applying the transpose to the density matrix: For result to be a density matrix: * Has trace 1? Yes. * Positive semi-def.? Calculate e-values: need p≤1/3

slide-21
SLIDE 21

2019 Q3 e

Start applying the transpose to the density matrix: For result to be a density matrix: * Has trace 1? Yes. * Positive semi-def.? Calculate e-values: need p≤1/3 When does ρ represent an entangled state? Peres-Horodecki criterion: p>1/3 (a.k.a. PPT criterion = positive partial transpose criterion → see next slide)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

2019 Q3 e

Peres-Horodecki criterion (a.k.a. PPT criterion = positive partial transpose criterion): ► More info: A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413-1415 (1996); Horodecki, Horodecki & Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1-8 (1996).

slide-23
SLIDE 23

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. It makes use of the works of Mateus Machado Luna.