introduction
play

Introduction People with T1DM are usually in basal-bolus therapy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CBR BASED BOLUS RECOMMENDER SYSTEM Ferran Torrent-Fontbona Introduction People with T1DM are usually in basal-bolus therapy Timely and accurate insulin dosage avoids hyperglycaemia and its consequent complications and reduces the risk of


  1. CBR BASED BOLUS RECOMMENDER SYSTEM Ferran Torrent-Fontbona

  2. Introduction  People with T1DM are usually in basal-bolus therapy  Timely and accurate insulin dosage avoids hyperglycaemia and its consequent complications and reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia  Bolus calculators: – Available in market products: pumps, glucose meters, apps… – They have been proved useful at improving glycaemic self-control – Drawbacks: difficulty setting parameters, need to regularly adjust them… – Far from achieving optimal results June 24, 2017 2/16

  3. Objectives  Provide a method capable of: – Estimating the personalised bolus calculator parameters – Learning from past experiences to adapt to new situations – Providing personalised adaptive bolus recommendations CASE BASED REASONING June 24, 2017 3/16

  4. Case based reasoning  Lazy learning method  Propose new solutions using past experiences  Good results with small amounts of data Query case Retrieve Maintenance Reuse Case base Revise June 24, 2017 4/16

  5. Bolus recommender system  The CBR estimates the Insulin to Carbs Ratio (ICR) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF)  Then, it calculates the bolus dose New case: • Carbohydrates • Blood Glucose • Time of day Retrieve • Exercise • Stress • … Maintenance Reuse Case base Revise June 24, 2017 5/16

  6. Retrieve Objective: select similar past experiences  ISF and ICR depend on several factors: stress, time of day, menstruations, illnesses…  Not all factors have the same impact  Proposed retrieve consists of two steps: – Context reasoning (select the case base corresponding to the context) – Similarity measure and case retrieval June 24, 2017 6/16

  7. Reuse Objective: Adapt past solutions to the new case  Reuse ICR from retrieved cases – Weighted average according to the similarity  Calculate ISF using the ICR 𝐽𝑇𝐺 = 341.94 ∙ 𝐽𝐷𝑆 Walsh et al. (2011). Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 𝑋  Calculate bolus dose 𝐽𝐷𝑆 + 𝐻 𝑑 − 𝐻 𝑡𝑞 𝐶 = 𝐷𝐼𝑃 − 𝐽𝑃𝐶 𝐽𝑇𝐺 𝐷𝐼𝑃 : carbs 𝐽𝑃𝐶 : insulin on board 𝐻 𝑑 : blood glucose level 𝑋 : body weight 𝐻 𝑡𝑞 : blood glucose target June 24, 2017 7/16

  8. Revise Objective: revise and repair the proposed solution  Revise: check minimum postprandial blood glucose and correct the recommended bolus (and ICR and ISF) to bring the value to the target one ෢ 𝐽𝐷𝑆 = 1 − 𝛽 𝐽𝐷𝑆 𝑠𝑓𝑣𝑡𝑓 + 𝛽𝐽𝐷𝑆 𝑑 𝐻 𝑑 𝐻 𝑛𝑗𝑜 Postprandial phase Meal time June 24, 2017 8/16

  9. Maintenance Objective: manage the case base to keep it updated and efficient  Concept drift problem  Proposed maintenance – Save the revise query case – If there are similar enough cases to the query case in the case base, then remove them June 24, 2017 9/16

  10. Experimentation  11 virtual adults using UVA/PADOVA simulator  Intra-day and physical activity variability have been added  50 simulations of 90-days  Comparison with a run-to-run algorithm June 24, 2017 10/16

  11. Results (without exercise) June 24, 2017 11/16

  12. Results (without exercise) June 24, 2017 12/16

  13. Results (with exercise) June 24, 2017 13/16

  14. Results (with exercise) June 24, 2017 14/16

  15. Conclusions  The proposed system: – Automatically estimates the personalised ICR and ISF – Is capable of adapting the parameters to new situations  Results are promising June 24, 2017 15/16

  16. T HANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION ferran.torrent@udg.edu

  17. Results (summary) CBR R2R ( avg ± std) ( avg ± std) Without exercise In target (%) 86.62 ± 1.73 78.07 ± 6.01 Below target (%) 2.74 ± 0.85 7.05 ± 4.16 Above target (%) 10.6 3 ± 1.40 14.88 ± 2.68 With exercise In target (%) 82.51 ± 1.43 75.00 ± 4.93 Below target (%) 4.51 ± 1.29 8.41 ± 3.43 Above target (%) 12.98 ± 0.73 16.59 ± 2.26 June 24, 2017 17/16

  18. Future work  Automatically learn similarity measure weights  Similarity measure capable to deal with missing values  Adaptable learning rate June 24, 2017 18/16

  19. Results (I)  Without physical activity June 24, 2017 19/16

  20. Results (II)  With physical activity June 24, 2017 20/16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend