Charley Wu Chemical and Process Engineering University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Introduction Many products are manufacturing through compaction of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Introduction Many products are manufacturing through compaction of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Charley Wu Chemical and Process Engineering University of Surrey, Guildford, UK 0 @charleywu @ C.Y.WU@surrey.ac.uk Introduction Many products are manufacturing through compaction of dry powders, involving powder flow into a confined space.
Introduction
Many products are manufacturing through compaction of dry powders, involving powder flow into a confined space.
w; 1p1 q:1:,:1m11
·Pharmaceutical ·Catalyst
- Automotive
·Chemical , •Ceramic , ·Magnetic ·Food
Typical Manufacturing Process
UNIVERSITY OF
- i...=;;;... SURREY
~
Upper punch
I
compacts I
..
I
Lower punch I
..........................
Die Filling Compaction Ejection
Why Die Filling Is Important?
Any problem during die filling will have a direct impact on the quality
- f the final products.
Failure during die filling can lead to
- Tablets of inaccurate dose!
- Products with large weight variation
- Products with non-uniform contents that detrimentally affect the
functionality
- Gears of uneven strength and with weakest links.
- Distortion (and complete failure) during subsequent processes, such
as sintering.
"If your doctor prescribed half a tablet a day, which half would you want to take? "(Malvern Instruments} 2008).
Methodology (Exp. + Modelling)
D A combined experimental and numerical approach was employed to understand the die filling process. D A model die filling system was developed. D Die filling behaviour was visualised using a high speed video system. D Quantitative analysis was also performed using
- PEPT -> particle velocity
- A pressure sensor -> time evolution of deposited
mass.
- An air pressure sensor -> air pressure build-up
D Mechanistic analysis was performed using DEM-CFO
'
SURREY
. t I t
L
SUNUIVERRRSITYEYOF
A typical expenmen a se -up
~
High speed video
.,J'
Air pressure sensor
J
Iii
L ~
e:.. 22001
~
J
_F~
~
J
<C .,J
·:ml ...................... .
~+ am BO75
- 70
~ J
~
I
]
30
Mass pressure sensor
32 34 38 38
Time (s)
PEPT Study
(Positron Emission Particle Tracking)
'
SURREY
PEPT Study
30 trajectories of individual particles
L
UNIVERSITY OF
~
SllR.REY
Spherical microcrystalline cellulose ( Celphere, CP102 )
Initial position of the shoe
- .-5' ~~ ~
'• V'i\7 v "' v7 'V w v"v
··-.
..
- '2>
- .
- 0 •
.
. ()
- o
6
- 9
- Die
Wu, C.-Y., X.F. Fan, F. Motazedian, J.P.K. Seville, D.J. Parker, A.C.F. Cocks, (2010). A Quantitative Investigation of Powder Flow during Die Filling Using Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E, Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 224(3): 169-175.
DEM-CFO
The flow of particles is modelled using DEM.
The interaction between particles are rigorously modelled using theoretical contact mechanics:
- Hertz-Mindlin-Deresiewicz for
elastic particles
- JKR for adhesive particles
The interaction between air and particles is considered. The flow of air is modelled using CFO. Particle equations of motion: 8(Epf)
- --+
at
8(Epfu) + '\7.
fUU )=
at
- Vpf +V·Tf
Epfg
DEM-CFO Validation
D Validation of DEM models is important. D Qualitatitive validation is easy, is it convincing? D Case-to-case quantitative validation is difficult.
" .
- •
8 •
~\
Experimental DEM-CFO
- +
- Guo Y, Wu C-Y, Thornton C. (2013) Modeling Gas-Particle Two-Phase Flows with Complex and Moving Boundaries using DEM-CFO with an Immersed Boundary Method. A/CHE
JOURNAL, 59 (4), pp. 1075-1087
DEM-CFO with Non-spherical Particles '
SURREY
D Multi-sphere -> approximate particle shapes using clumped spheres. D Utilize the rigorous contact laws for modelling particle-particle interaction
)
!(_ SUNUIVERRRSITYEYOF Die filling with real particles (Wu et al. 2016
~
Real crystal DEM approximation
Flow from a stationary feeder
In Vacuum
InAir Ps =1500 kg/m
3 , dP =50 µm
Flow from a stationary feeder
In Vacuun1
InAir
Flow from a stationary feeder
- 0. 7
06~0
................... .A
........................
~
...............
a
.......................
A."'.I"'i'*°"~
.
...........
llf!'
..... ..
0.50 0.40 0.30- 0.20 0.10 0.09
According to Beverloo equation, M* is in the range of 0.55-0.65.
.A. In vacuum ~
ln air ]Group 1
- [n vacuum
1-n air
}Group 2
e In vacuum
Q In air
)Group3
T In vacuum }
\J Jn air
Group 4
......... Constant in vacuum
- Power law in air
- .os~,~-~
1~
10
4
I ~10
6
I~
10
8
At<P
p
Normalised mass flowrate
M
Normalised particle density
<I>
= Ps
P
Pa
Archimedes Number
(
- ) d3
A = Pa Ps
Pa gi p
r
1]2
This is in excellent agreement with Berveloo constants obtained experimentally (C is in the range of 0.55-0.65, for spherical particle c~0.58, see Seville et al. 1997).
Guo Y., Kafui K.D., Wu C.Y., Thornton C. and Seville J.P.K., (2009), A coupled DEM/CFO analysis of the effect of air on powder flow during die filling. A/CHE Journal, 55
(1 ): 49-62.
Flow from a stationary feeder
'
SURREY
0.70~ 06~0
................................
..................................................................
~
. .
. ~
.... ~
.~
....
..
0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.08 3
10
Air sensitive
- In vacuum
!:;::. Jn air }Group I
- In vacuum
0 In air
}Group 2
e In vacuum
0 ln air
}Group 3
T In vacuum }
'7 1
. Group4
v n atr
......... Constant in vacuum
- Power law in air
Ar" </J
p Air inert
Guo Y., Kafui K.D., Wu C.Y., Thornton C. and Seville J.P.K., (2009), A coupled DEM/CFO analysis of the effect of air on powder flow during die filling. A/CHE Journal, 55
(1 ):
49-62.
Flow from a moving feeder
(Fine sand, Vshoe=300 mm/s) (MCC, Vshoe=50 mm/s)
Flow from a moving feeder
In Air ,.-~
,In Air ~-=-
V=35 mm/s V=70 mm/s
Flow from a moving feeder
0.8
~
0.6
.....
~ ;...,
.......... ..........
~
0.4
0.2 I I
I
/cruv
el\ i
- In vacuum
0 In air
- Fitting curve in vacuum
- Fitting curve in air
8 =(99 .33/v )1 68
shoe
/
8 =(4 7 .26/v )
119 shoe
50 100 150 200 Shoe speed v 1 (nun/s)
S lOe
'
SURREY
D There is a critical filling speed during die filling, above which the die cannot be completely filled. D The critical filling speed is a function of powder properties, and process system parameters D For a given process system, the critical filling speed is dominated by powder
- properties. This can also be
used to assess powder flowability.
Flow from a moving feeder
C11t1cal Ftllu1c Spet-!d •
nu11 ~ •
200
CP30:'
Flo\'\' Ftu1ction 50 .
.\.ng.J.e of
repose
1.6
l\fr1~
Flo\\· R~1te 1
g ~ 1
'-
Good flowability Poor flowability
Flow from a moving feeder
200
,,,-.....
rfj
] 150
......_,.
>
(.) 100
50
- MCC PH102
e
MCC PH101
... MCCDG
+ Mannitol
D Mix 1
8
Mix2 Mix3
- Eq.(9)
- ... .
- L-~-L-~
10 20 30
Flow index rljJ (mm)
40
'
SURREY
A Mathematical Model for Die Filling
400
40
- Experimental
- Experimental
Model
300
30
- Model
- M>
- ... -
l:ID
20
:~
200
- Mt
~a
Mt
·-
lg
2
~
10 100
D
100
200
300 400 500
200 400
600
800 Filling speed (mm/s) Fiming speed (mm/s)
(a) (b)
- Experimental
60 40
- Experimental
so
Model
- Model
- 3D
Ga 40
- illa
- ~
30
..,. 2D
...,
ftl ftl
::!: 20 ::!:
10
- 10
200
400
600
D 50
l!.00
150
200 250 Flllng speed (mm/s) Filling speed (mm/s)
(c) (d)
The variation of the deposited mass with the filling speeds for a) Silibeads 300; b) Cenopheres 500; c) Mannitol and d) Alumina 4.
A Mathematical Model for Die Filling
- QI)
- ......
300 250 200
- COE Experimental
- -Full model
S300
e GBLSmm
E 150
- u
>
100
I C500
~
so
Mann1to9
MCCOG
11
1.E+o3
1.E+o4
1
.. E+os
1.E+06 1.E+07
1
.. E+o8
1.E+o9 1.E+lO
The critical filling speed obtained in the closed die experiments as a function of~
(=Ar.<J>)
Ar= PaPsgd;
<I>= PP
')
rr
Pa
Conclusions
D Powder into a confined space depends upon powder properties, die geometry and filling conditions. D The influence of air presence can be significant. D DEM-CFO is capable of capturing the major features during die filling. D Critical filling speed could be used to characterise powder flowability. D Based on air sensitivity classification obtained by Guo et al. (2010), a model was developed to predict the deposited mass and the critical filling speed.
Acknowledgements
EPSRC IFPRI AstraZeneca Sanofi Pfizer
- Dr. Yu Guo
- Dr. Chunlei Pei
- Dr. Serena Schiano
- Mr. Joesry El Hebieshy
- Ms. Anastasiya Zakhvatayeva
- Dr. Colin Thornton
- Dr. Ling Zhang
EPSRC
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council