SLIDE 1 HL HL-2A 2A G.Y. Zheng1, X.R. Duan1, X.Q. Xu2, D.D. Ryutov2, L.J. Cai1, X. Liu1, J.X. Li1, T.Y. Xia3, Y.Y Lian1, L. Xue1, Y.D. Pan1 and B. Li1
1Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu, China 2Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA 3Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
Introduction of HL-2M divertor design
Vienna, 29 September – 2 October 2015 The 1st IAEA Technical Meeting on Divertor Concepts
SLIDE 2 HL HL-2A 2A
Content
- 1. Configuration design of HL-2M
- 2. Properties of divertor configurations
- 3. Divertor target geometry and simulation
- 4. Engineering design and X-point control
- 5. Plan and summary
SLIDE 3 HL HL-2A 2A
1.65 m
0.40 m
1.2~2.7 T
Limiter, LSN divertor
150 ~ 480 kA
1.0 ~ 6.0 x 1019 m-3
1.5 ~ 5.0 keV
0.5 ~ 2.8 keV Heating: ECRH/ECCD: 5 MW
(6 X 68 GHz/0.5MW/1s, 2 X 140 GHz/1W/1s)
NBI (tangential): 3 MW LHCD: 2 MW
(4/3.7 GHz/500 kW/2 s)
Diagnostics: over 30, e.g. CXRS, MSE, ECEI…
Fuelling system (H2/D2): Gas puffing (LFS, HFS,
divertor), Pellet injection (LFS, HFS), SMBI /CJI (LFS, HFS) LFS: f =1~80 Hz, pulse duration > 0.5 ms gas pressure < 3 MPa
HL-2A
SLIDE 4 HL HL-2A 2A
Plasma current Ip = 2.5 (3) MA Major radius R = 1.78 m Minor radius a = 0.65 m Aspect ratio R/a = 2.8 Elongation Κ = 1.8-2 Triangularity δ > 0.5 Toroidal field BT = 2.2 (3) T Flux swing ΔΦ= 14Vs Heating power 25 MW
Main parameters
HL-2M (new tokamak, under construction)
HL-2M tokamak
Mission: high performance, high beta, and high bootstrap
current plasma; advanced divertor (snowflake, tripod), PWI.
SLIDE 5
HL HL-2A 2A
Test the engineering and physics issues relevant to to fusion reactor, such as ITER and CFETR. Heat flux at target can be roughly compared, (total heating power is 25MW, λq less than 2mm with Ip = 3MA).
HL-2M
Mitigation of heat flux at target to support HL-2M high performance operation.
High performance plasma and advanced divertor
SLIDE 6 HL HL-2A 2A
CS and PF coil CS and PF coil parameters of HL parameters of HL-2M 2M
R(mm) R(mm) Z(mm) Z(mm) W(mm) W(mm) H(mm) H(mm) Ncoil Ncoil (Nr Nr×Nz Nz) Max(k Max(k A) A)
PF1
912 185 50.4 352.4 28(2×14) 14.5
PF2
912 586 50.4 352.4 28(2×14) 14.5
PF3
912 987 50.4 352.4 28(2×14) 14.5
PF4
912 1388 50.4 352.4 28(2×14) 14.5
PF5
1092 1753 183 220 28(5×6) 38
PF6
1501 1790 257 146 27(7×4) 39.41
PF7
2500 1200 183 220 28(5×6) 39
PF8
2760 480 183 220 28(5×6) 35.29
CS
748 116.75 3442.3 96(2×48) 110
HL-2M
CS and PF coil parameters of HL-2M
All of PF Coil current can be reversed for HL-2M
SLIDE 7 HL HL-2A 2A
Standard divertor to advanced divertor
PF4/L and PF6/L as divertor coils to generate two separate X-points; PF5/L adjusts position of the two X-points to satisfy design requirements, such as snowflake divertor configuration.
Standard divertor
HL-2M Snowflake Tripod
SLIDE 8 HL HL-2A 2A
Ip(MA) R (m) a (m) Κ δ up δ down li βp EFIT 1.2 1.71 0.56 1.698 0.265 0.735 1.17 0.645 CORSICA 1.2 1.71 0.55 1.694 0.255 0.745 1.17 0.64
EFIT CORSICA
Equilibrium benchmark by EFIT and CORSICA
SLIDE 9 HL HL-2A 2A
Standard divertor Exact SF divertor SF divertor-plus SF divertor- minus
Ip(MA) R (m) a (m) Κ δ up δ down li βp 2.0 1.78 0.62 1.73 0.3 0.74 1.20 0.60
Snowflake configurations of HL-2M
SLIDE 10 HL HL-2A 2A
Exact-SF
When the plasma current reduces, the second X-point is fixed and first X point is forced to moved up by take advantage of poloidal field of CS coil: When plasma current is 0.9MA, the distance between the X-points will be more than 50cm.
SF-minus Tripod Tripod
Snowflake divertor to Tripod dievrtor
SLIDE 11 HL HL-2A 2A
Standard divertor
Weak Bp region of HL-2M SF divertor
Exact-SF Standard SF-plus SF-minus
D.D. Ryutov, et al., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 52, 539, 2012; PPCF, 54, 124050, 2012.
Fast convective heat transport around weak Bp can increase power sharing among the divertor legs and broaden the heat flux profile at target.
SLIDE 12
HL HL-2A 2A
Weak Bp region of HL-2M SF/Tripod divertor
When the distance between the two X-points becomes large, configuration loses features of snowflake divertor, becoming just two separate X-points; Tripod configuration has a long divertor leg and three outgoing branches of the separatrix.
SLIDE 13 HL HL-2A 2A
The local shear The integrated magnetic shear
Magnetic shear and curvature analysis of SF
Same main parameters, R, a, Ip, k95, q95. Same pressure and current profiles. (Local magnetic shear) Radius of curvature on outer mid-plane
SLIDE 14
HL HL-2A 2A
The linear growth rate
Snowflake-minus improves P-B mode instability
The snowflake-minus has the closest X-point to the outer mid-plane is able to affect the property of ballooning modes. The second X-point improves the bad curvature in favor of the suppression of P-B modes.
SLIDE 15 HL HL-2A 2A
SF SD
The TQ and the CQ phase
The hot vertical displacement phase
Configuration evolution during VDE
Parameters Ip (MA) R0 (m) a (m) κ95 βp li δ95 Bt (T) Value 1.00 1.71 0.55 1.65 0.60 1.06 0.25 2.20
SLIDE 16
HL HL-2A 2A 30cm The configurations (standard, snowflake and tripod) of HL-2M can be explored by optimizing the target geometry; High cooling ability to support the high heat flux operation; Flexible support structure, and well protection for cooling pipe system; Easy installation, maintenance and update.
Divertor engineering design consideration
SLIDE 17
HL HL-2A 2A
Standard divertor Exact snowflake Snowflake minus
Target plate geometry of HL-2M
Divertor target geometry is expected to be compatible with the configurations of HL-2M. Ip=2MA Ip=2MA
SLIDE 18
HL HL-2A 2A
Bp / Bt value around target of HL-2M divertor
γmin ≈ Bp/Bt sinα., if γmin too small, the shadows and hot spots may appear on the plate; γmin is assumed to be 1/50 of a radian (roughly 1 degree).
Standard divertor Exact snowflake Snowflake minus
SLIDE 19 HL HL-2A 2A
Connection length
If If λq=2mm of HL-2M, the plasma-wetted area: more than 1.5m2 of SF and about 0.3m2 of SD; P=12MW, 8MW/m2 of SF, 40MW/m2 of SD.
Standard divertor Snowflake minus
Mesh of SD and SF
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.035 0.040 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Ratio of connection length Distance from separatrix at outer middle plane (m)
Standard divertor Snowflake divertor
Surface expansion
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Surface expansion Distance from separatrix at outer middle plane (m)
Standard divertor Snowflake divertor
Ip=2MA Ip=2MA
SLIDE 20
HL HL-2A 2A
Simulation boundary conditions of SD and SF
Cross field transport factor: D = 0.2m2/s, χe = χi = 0.5m2/s; Power flows into SOL/Divertor regions: P = 12MW, Pi=Pe=6MW; The density is fixed about 4cm inside the separatrix, and the upstream density ne,sep = 2.5*1019/m3; The pumping gas speed S=50m3/s; Carbon as impurity is included; When Ip=2.0MA, the plasma density limit is about 1.5*1020/m3.
SLIDE 21 HL HL-2A 2A
2MW/m2 of SF, and about 5.8/m2 of SD.
Heat flux distribution of SD and SF
The heat flux distribution at outer target of standard divertor The heat flux distribution at outer target of snowflake minus
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1x10
6
2x10
6
3x10
6
4x10
6
5x10
6
6x10
6
Heat flux W/m2
Distance from separatrix at outer target (m)
Standard divertor Snowflake divertor
Heat flux profiles at outer target
SLIDE 22 HL HL-2A 2A
Electron density at outer target
Electron density at outer target of SD and SF
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.0 2.0x10
20
4.0x10
20
6.0x10
20
8.0x10
20
1.0x10
21
1.2x10
21
1.4x10
21
Density (/m3) Distance from separetirx at outer targte (m)
Standard divertor Snowflake divertor
Standard divertor Snowflake minus
SLIDE 23
HL HL-2A 2A
Carbon ion density distribution of SD
C4+ C6+ C5+ C3+ C2+ C1+
SLIDE 24
HL HL-2A 2A
C3+ C2+ C1+ C4+ C6+ C5+
Carbon ion density distribution of SF
SLIDE 25 HL HL-2A 2A
Zeff distribution of SD and SF
20 40 60 80 100 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Zeff From inner target along poloidal direction to ourter target
Standard divertor Snowflake divertor
Inner target Near X point Outer mid-plane Near X point Outer target
Standard divertor Snowflake minus
SLIDE 26 HL HL-2A 2A
Peak heat flux at outer target of SF and SD
8 10 12 14 16 18 1x10
6
2x10
6
3x10
6
4x10
6
5x10
6
6x10
6
7x10
6
8x10
6
Heat flux (W/m
2)
Power flows into SOL/Divertor region (MW) Standards divertor Snowflake divertor 2.1x10
19
2.4x10
19
2.7x10
19
3.0x10
19
3.3x10
19
2.0x10
6
4.0x10
6
6.0x10
6
8.0x10
6
1.0x10
7
1.2x10
7
Standard divertor Snowflake divertor
Heat flux (W/m
2)
Electron density at outer mid-plane (m
3)
The peak heat flux of SF is about 35% of SD (P=8-18MW); ne,sep = 2.0*1019/m3,2.3MW/m2 of SF, 10.8MW/m2 of SF.
Peak heat flux at target with different power flows into SOL/Divertor region Peak heat flux at target with different Electron density at outer mid-plane
P=12MW
SLIDE 27 HL HL-2A 2A
SF and Tripod divertor configurations, Ip = 0.5MA
Snowflake minus Tripod 2 Tripod 1
Ip = 0.5MA Ip = 0.5MA Ip = 0.5MA
SLIDE 28 HL HL-2A 2A D = 0.3m2/s, χe = χi = 1.0m2/s; P = 8MW, Pi = Pe = 4MW; ne,sep = 1.4*1019/m3; Pumping speed is 50m3/s; Carbon as impurity is included.
Mesh and boundary conditions of SD and SF
Snowflake minus Tripod Tripod
Ip = 0.5MA Ip = 0.5MA Ip = 0.5MA
SLIDE 29 HL HL-2A 2A
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Surface expansion Distance from separatrix at outer mid-plane (m)
Standard divertor Snowflake minus (YX-point = 120cm) Tripod 1 (YX-point = 110cm) Tripod 2 (YX-point = 100cm)
Connection length and surface expansion
Ratio of connection length of four kinds divertor configuration Surface expansion of four kinds divertor configuration
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Ratio of connection length Distance from separatrix at outer mid-plane (m)
Standard divertor Snowflake minus (YX-point = 120cm) Tripod (YX-point = 110cm) Tripod (YX-point = 100cm)
SLIDE 30 HL HL-2A 2A
Heat flux distribution of SF and Tripod
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1x10
6
2x10
6
3x10
6
4x10
6
5x10
6
Heat flux (W/m
2)
Distance from separatrix at outer target (m)
Standard divertor Snowflake minus (YX-point = 120cm) Tripod (YX-point = 110cm) Tripod (YX-point = 100cm)
Snowflake minus Tripod 2 Tripod 1 Standard divertor
SLIDE 31
HL HL-2A 2A
Zeff distribution of different configurations
Snowflake minus Tripod 2 Tripod 1 Standard divertor
SLIDE 32
HL HL-2A 2A
Carbon ion density distribution
C4+ C6+ C5+ C4+ C6+ C5+
Snowflake minus Tripod 2 Tripod 2 Tripod 2 Snowflake minus Snowflake minus
SLIDE 33 HL HL-2A 2A
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
0.0 2.0x10
5
4.0x10
5
6.0x10
5
8.0x10
5
1.0x10
6
1.2x10
6
1.4x10
6
1.6x10
6
1.8x10
6
Heat flux (W/m2) Distance from the separatrix (m)
Ip=1.2MA Ip=0.9MA Ip=0.7MA
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
0.0 2.0x10
5
4.0x10
5
6.0x10
5
8.0x10
5
1.0x10
6
1.2x10
6
1.4x10
6
1.6x10
6
1.8x10
6
Heat flux (W/m
2)
Distance from the separatrix (m)
Ip=1.2MA Ip=0.9MA Ip=0.7MA
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
0.0 2.0x10
5
4.0x10
5
6.0x10
5
8.0x10
5
1.0x10
6
1.2x10
6
1.4x10
6
1.6x10
6
1.8x10
6
Heat flux (W/m2)
Distance from the separatrix (m) Ip=1.2MA Ip=0.9MA Ip=0.7MA
- 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
0.0 2.0x10
5
4.0x10
5
6.0x10
5
8.0x10
5
1.0x10
6
1.2x10
6
1.4x10
6
1.6x10
6
1.8x10
6
Heat flux (W/m2) Distance from the separatrix (m)
Ip=1.2MA Ip=0.9MA Ip=0.7MA
Ip = 0.7MA P =10MW ne= 1.5X1019/m3
Heat flux at targets of DN tripod divertor
Limit the power flows into inner divertor region. Handle most of heating power by outer divertor.
SLIDE 34 HL HL-2A 2A
Vacuum Vessel First wall
Divertor
Divertor and first wall engineering design
First wall: Graphite; Target plate: CFC.
SLIDE 35 HL HL-2A 2A
Divertor engineering design and fabrication
Cassette divertor structure of HL-2M
CFC as the plasma facing material brazed on the copper alloy heat sink; Cooling and baking channels are drilled inside the target copper plates to feed cooling water; Channels are connected to pipes embedded inside the support frame;
Design of diveror structure: 80 sections, cassette, individual cooling, link structure for stress release
SLIDE 36 HL HL-2A 2A
In-vessel and ex-vessel cooling circuits Feeding and collection pipes
Cooling design and analysis
Variation of highest CFC temperature with time
10MW/m2, 5s
SLIDE 37
HL HL-2A 2A
Development of W coatings on graphite and CFC
SLIDE 38
HL HL-2A 2A
Development of W coatings on graphite and CFC
SLIDE 39 HL HL-2A 2A
P0 P1 P3 P2
X2
X1
exp exp
( , , ) C x y Locally expand the Grad-Shafranov equation:
X-points Control methods
Find coefficients, Cexp, with the Br and Bz at points(P0-P3) from RTEFIT Control X1, X2, ρ and θ Created the relationship between the PF coils current and the X-point locations:
1
( )
T T PF
I A A A W B
1 1 2 2
[ , , , , ]
iso T iso
G A X P G B x y x y
whe here, e,
exp exp exp
1 1
r z PF r PF z PF
C C B B x x I C B I B I
X, P , G
2 2
r r r r z So So
SLIDE 40 HL HL-2A 2A
Controlling the distance between two X-points
文件 文件 装置 炮号 时间 模式 迭代误差 迭代次数 运行模式 平衡模式 收敛与否 已收敛 位形 位形中心 位形中心 小半径 位形 下单零 上三角形变 下三角形变 截面积 体积 上拉长比 下拉长比 边界磁通 磁轴磁通 电流
Control two X-points
文件 文件 装置 炮号 时间 模式 迭代误差 迭代次数 运行模式 平衡模式 收敛与否 已收敛 位形 位形中心 位形中心 小半径 位形 下单零 上三角形变 下三角形变 截面积 体积 上拉长比 下拉长比 边界磁通 磁轴磁通 电流
0.5 1 1.5
5 10 15 20
200 400 sum__delt__Ipf(A) dIPF1U dIPF2U dIPF3U dIPF4U dIPF5U dIPF6U dIPF7U dIPF8U 5 10 15 20
0.5 1 1.5 x 10
4
sum__delt__Ipf(A) dIPF1L dIPF2L dIPF3L dIPF4L dIPF5L dIPF6L dIPF7L dIPF8L
PF5 PF3 PF2 PF6
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
50 100 150 200 R-Z(mm) The different of Xpoints' position from the target points dRX1 dZX1 dRX2 dZX2
dRX = RX-target - RX-cur dZX = ZX-target - ZX-cur
SLIDE 41 HL HL-2A 2A
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
20 40 60 80 100 R-Z(mm) The different of Xpoints' position from the target points dRX1 dZX1 dRX2 dZX2
Controlling the second X-point
文件 文件 装置 炮号 时间 模式 迭代误差 迭代次数 运行模式 平衡模式 收敛与否 已收敛 位形 位形中心 位形中心 小半径 位形 下单零 上三角形变 下三角形变 截面积 体积 上拉长比 下拉长比 边界磁通 磁轴磁通 电流
dRX = RX-target - RX-cur dZX = ZX-target - ZX-cur
5 10 15 20
100 200 300 sum__delt__Ipf(A) dIPF1U dIPF2U dIPF3U dIPF4U dIPF5U dIPF6U dIPF7U dIPF8U 5 10 15 20
2000 4000 6000 8000 sum__delt__Ipf(A) dIPF1L dIPF2L dIPF3L dIPF4L dIPF5L dIPF6L dIPF7L dIPF8L
PF5 PF3 PF2 PF6
Control the second X-points
SLIDE 42 HL HL-2A 2A
Phase I: no feedback control, plasma vertical position grows exponentially Phase II: feedback control of plasma vertical position start at the same time k95 1.53 1.56 1.58 Growth rate 169 177 186 k95 1.55 1.58 Growth rate 162 208
I I I
k95
95=1.58
I I I
k95
95=1.58
SF SF SD SD VDE control analysis of SF and SD divertor
SLIDE 43
HL HL-2A 2A
Complicate configurations of HL-2M
More codes be involved in HL-2M divertor design and analysis, such as SOLPS-ITER, EMC3, SOLEDGE and so on. The affect of the second X-point will be investigated.
SLIDE 44
HL HL-2A 2A According to the lower divertor operation results, the upper divertor will be designed and installed; Based on the W coating technology developed at SWIP, the first wall and target plate with W coating will be carried out step by step; The PWI researches based on HL-2M advanced divertor will be studied, as well as the compatibility with the high performance core plasma operation; The particle control ability of HL-2M will be enhanced.
Possible divertor engineering update
SLIDE 45
HL HL-2A 2A
Summary
Divertor configurations, properties analysis, target design, divertor simulation, engineering design and configuration control works are carried at SWIP for HL-2M divertor design. Based on the design and analysis, standard and advanced divertors will be are explored in HL-2M experimental research project to study the divertor physics and mitigate heat flux for high heating power operation. Advanced divertor is an important mission of HL-2M, the divertor physics, engineering design, code simulation and so on are challenges for us now.
SLIDE 46
HL HL-2A 2A
Thank you!