introducing the new iowa assessments part 3 implications
play

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Part 3: Implications for AYP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Part 3: Implications for AYP Reporting The Iowa Assessments Dates Locations Purposes Introduction May AEAs Overview of changes in content, June ordering, delivery, reporting Content August


  1. Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Part 3: Implications for AYP Reporting

  2. The Iowa Assessments Dates Locations Purposes Introduction May AEAs Overview of changes in content, June ordering, delivery, reporting Content August Webinars Details on content coverage, Overviews September instructional linkages Interpretation October AEAs Details on new reports, Overviews November Webinars interpretations and use Professional Scheduled as Schools Strategies for using Iowa Development needed Districts Assessment data to inform and change instruction 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  3. Details • All slides posted to Iowa Testing Programs website: https://www.education.uiowa.edu/itp/ • Q&A is underway and will be posted by early June • Catherine-welch@uiowa.edu 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  4. Implications for AYP Reporting

  5. New Iowa Assessments Implications for Determination of Proficiency • Background – Due to historical trend data available prior to NCLB, the state’s workbook application requested continued flexibility of administration dates (fall, midyear or spring) – The National Percentile Rank (NPR) metric allowed for a fixed cutscore while allowing for flexibility in administration dates 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  6. New Iowa Assessments Implications for Determination of Proficiency • Assumptions for new forms – Schools will continue to administer their Iowa Assessments to meet their scheduling requirements and to retain their historical trend data (fall, midyear or spring) – New forms will be linked to previous forms and the equivalent of the 41 st NPR from the 2000 norms will be identified on the Form E scale – The expectations for proficiency remain the same from Forms A/B to Forms E/F – Interpretation information will be made available to schools to transition to new forms 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  7. Standard Score Scale 41 NPR = 259 Standard Score = 21 Raw Score 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  8. Current Proficiency Ranges – High School Reading Example Testing Period Score Not Proficient Proficient Fall Raw Score 1-20 21-44 Standard Score 165-258 259-369 NPR 1-40 41-99 Midyear Raw Score 1-21 22-44 Standard Score 170-261 262-369 NPR 1-40 41-99 Spring Raw Score 1-22 23-44 Standard Score 170-262 263-374 NPR 1-40 41-99 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  9. Proposed Link to Proficiency Ranges – High School Reading Example Testing Score Proficiency -- Proficiency – Period Current New Fall Raw Score 21-44 New assessments will be linked to Standard Score 259-369 current NPR 41-99 assessments Midyear Raw Score 22-44 Standard score scale will be Standard Score 262-369 established using NPR 41-99 linking relationship Spring Raw Score 23-44 SS metric will be used for reporting Standard Score 263-374 AYP NPR 41-99 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  10. Reading Example Form A Form E Fall 41st NPR 259 SS 257 SS Form A Form E Midyear 41st NPR 262 SS 259 SS Form A Form E Spring 41st NPR 263 SS 260 SS 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

  11. Summary • Proficiency cutscores be reported in Standard Score metric • Proficiency cutscores be available in August • Cutscores will be provided for: – Grades 3-12 – Mathematics, Reading, Science – Fall, Midyear, Spring 2011 by Iowa Testing Programs

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend