Internship Report Erin Kersh July 27, 2009 Nextrans Center A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

internship report
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Internship Report Erin Kersh July 27, 2009 Nextrans Center A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Internship Report Erin Kersh July 27, 2009 Nextrans Center A Strategic Planning Framework to Enhance Infrastructure Network Survivability and Functionality under Disasters Srinivas Peeta and Lili Du Outline Background Related


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Internship Report

Erin Kersh July 27, 2009 Nextrans Center

A Strategic Planning Framework to Enhance Infrastructure Network Survivability and Functionality under Disasters Srinivas Peeta and Lili Du

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

 Background  Related Literature  Problem Description  Related Methodologies  Bi-level Stochastic Problem  Knapsack Problem  Maximum Flow  Shortest Path  Model  Network  Data Analysis

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

 Man made and natural disasters both represent

randomness

 Disasters disrupt the connectivity and functionality of

transportation networks

 Pre-Disaster Planning  Post-Disaster Management

 Previous work shows that upgrading the network would

negate this effect

 Subject to budget limitations  Need to optimize which links to upgrade

 Network Survivability  Network Connectivity

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Related Literature

 Page and Perry (1994)  Soni, Gupta and Pirkul (1999)  Werner, Taylor, Moore, Mander, Jernigan,

and Hwang

 Liu and Fan (2006)  Murray-Tuite and Mahmassani (2004)  Matisziw and Murray (2007)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Problem Description

 First Stage - Investment Decisions  Link importance is measured in the first

level in terms of:

 Network connectivity - Wc  Improvement of survivability rate - Wp  Expected traffic flow – Wf

 Second Stage - Network Performance

Expected travel time

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Related Methodologies

 Bi-level stochastic problem  Knapsack Problem

Determine the best use of the budget to

improve connectivity

 Maximum Flow

Requires paths to take into account the

maximum allowable capacity

 Shortest Path

Used to determine functional routes in the

surviving network after a disaster

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Bi-Level Stochastic Network Model

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Two-Stage Stochastic Model

slide-9
SLIDE 9

24 Nodes 38 Two-Way Links (76 Total Links)

Liu and Fan (2006)

Sioux Fall City Network

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Input Data for The Algorithm

 Travel Time  Upgrade Cost  Probability of Disaster  Probability of Link Failure  Capacity

Randomly assigned using service volumes of

multilane highways in LOS C

slide-11
SLIDE 11

My Work

 Test the sensitivity of O-D Pairs

Number Configuration

 For the given network, determined 4 O-D

pair scenarios:

OD2 OD5 ODcenter ODspread

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Chart Flow of O-D Pair Sensitivity Analysis

slide-13
SLIDE 13

First Set of O-D Pairs Used for Sensitivity Analysis: Importance of the Number of O-D Pairs

2 O-D Pairs 5 O-D Pairs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results for Sensitivity Analysis of the Number of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Network With 5 O-D Pairs Using Y2 vs Y5

800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 Expected Travel Time for the Shortest Path Across ODs Y_MSA_OD2 Y_MSA_OD5

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results for Sensitivity Analysis of the Number of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Network With 5 O-D Pairs Using Y2 vs Y5

0.39 0.395 0.4 0.405 0.41 0.415 Average Expected OD Survivability Y_MSA_OD2 Y_MSA_OD5

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results for Sensitivity Analysis of the Number of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Network With 2 O-D Pairs Using Y2 vs Y5

355 360 365 370 375 380 385 Expected Travel Time for the Shortest Path Across ODs Y_MSA_OD2 Y_MSA_OD5

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results for Sensitivity Analysis of the Number of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Network With 2 O-D Pairs Using Y2 vs Y5

0.29 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 Average Expected OD Survivability Y_MSA_OD2 Y_MSA_OD5

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Second Set of O-D Pairs Used For Sensitivity Analysis: Importance of O-D Pair Configuration

Centralized O-D Pairs Spread Out O-D Pairs

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Network With Centered O-D Pairs Using YCenter vs. YSpread 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 Expected Travel Time for the Shortest Path Across ODs Y_MSA_ODSpread Y_MSA_ODCenter

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Network With Centered O-D Pairs Using YCenter vs. YSpread 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.5 0.51 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.55 Average Expected OD Survivability Y_MSA_ODSpread Y_MSA_ODCenter

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Network With Spread Out O-D Pairs Using YCenter vs. YSpread 1220 1240 1260 1280 1300 1320 1340 1360 1380 Expected Travel Time for the Shortest Path Across ODs Y_MSA_ODSpread Y_MSA_ODCenter

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Network With Spread Out O-D Pairs Using YCenter vs. YSpread 0.28 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 Average Expected OD Survivability Y_MSA_ODSpread Y_MSA_ODCenter

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Third Set of O-D Pairs Used For Sensitivity Analysis: Importance of O-D Pair Configuration

Centralized O-D Pairs Spread Out O-D Pairs “In Between” O-D Pairs

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Centered O-D Pairs Network Using YCenter2

  • vs. YMiddle vs. YSpread2

550 600 650 700 750 800 Expected Travel Time for the Shortest Path Across ODs Y_MSA_ODSpread2 Y_MSA_ODCenter2 Y_MSA_ODMiddle

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Centered O-D Pairs Network Using YCenter2

  • vs. YMiddle vs. YSpread2

0.5 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.6 0.62 0.64 Average Expected OD Survivability Y_MSA_ODSpread2 Y_MSA_ODCenter2 Y_MSA_ODMiddle

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Spread Out O-D Pairs Network Using YCenter2

  • vs. YMiddle vs. YSpread2

1060 1080 1100 1120 1140 1160 1180 Expected Travel Time for the Shortest Path Across ODs Y_MSA_ODSpread2 Y_MSA_ODCenter2 Y_MSA_ODMiddle

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Spread Out O-D Pairs Network Using YCenter2

  • vs. YMiddle vs. YSpread2

0.28 0.29 0.3 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.35 Average Expected OD Survivability Y_MSA_ODSpread2 Y_MSA_ODCenter2 Y_MSA_ODMiddle

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Middle O-D Pairs Network Using YCenter2 vs. YMiddle vs. YSpread2

1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1060 1070 1080 Expected Travel Time for the Shortest Path Across ODs Y_MSA_ODSpread2 Y_MSA_ODCenter2 Y_MSA_ODMiddle

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Results for the Sensitivity Analysis of the Configuration of O-D Pairs Used in the Algorithm

Middle O-D Pairs Network Using YCenter2 vs. YMiddle vs. YSpread2

0.35 0.355 0.36 0.365 0.37 0.375 0.38 0.385 Average Expected OD Survivability Y_MSA_ODSpread2 Y_MSA_ODCenter2 Y_MSA_ODMiddle

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conclusion

 Fewer O-D Pairs can be used to

determine network survivability

 Centered network out-performed other

investment strategies

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Questions or Comments?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Knapsack Problem

 Any IP that has only one constraint  Branch-and-Bound Method

 Each variable (xi) must equal 0 or 1:  ci/ai = benefit item i earns for each unit of resource

used by item i (larger value = better item)

 To Solve: Compute all ci/ai values, put best item in

knapsack, put the second-best item in knapsack, continue until the best remaining item will fill the knapsack

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Maximum Flow

 Problem in which the arcs have a capacity

which limits the quantity of a product that can be shipped through that arc

 0 ≤ flow through each arc ≤ capacity  Flow into node i = flow out of node i

(conservation-of-flow constraint)

 Ford-Fulkerson Method – is it optimal flow

  • r can it be modified to have a larger flow?
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Shortest Path

 Problem of finding the shortest path

(path of min length) from node 1 to another node

 Dijkstra’s Algorithm – find shortest

path from one node to all others

 Add what we used