International Regulatory Cooperation The range of possible approaches - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
International Regulatory Cooperation The range of possible approaches - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
International Regulatory Cooperation The range of possible approaches Cline Kauffmann, Deputy Head, Regulatory Policy Division OECD Public Governance and Territorial Development Key questions 1. What do we know of the various approaches and
Key questions
- 1. What do we know of the various
approaches and instruments of IRC?
- 2. What are the lessons learnt from the use
- f different IRC approaches in different
country and sector contexts?
- 3. What are the conditions of success and
effectiveness of different IRC approaches?
Regulatory dialogues, exchange of information Harmonisation through supra- national institutions Specific negotiated agreements (conventions, treaties) Formal regulatory co-operation partnerships Joint standard setting through IGO Trade agreements with regul. provisions Mutual recognition IRC requirement when drafting regulation, GRP Recognition of international standards Trans-governmental networks of regulators Soft law, guidelines, principles, codes of conduct
Source: OECD (2013), International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing Global Challenges
The ladder of IRC approaches
Lessons learnt on merits / challenges
Type of mechanism
Merits Challenges
Integration / harmonisation
The rules are the same for all. Compliance is the greatest. Less likely to regulatory capture than networks Long process. Costs of structure & enforcement. Sovereignty & legitimacy issues.
Regulatory partnerships between countries
High-level leadership Flexible & continuous mechanism Impact on regulators & levels of jurisdiction?
IGOs
Promote continuous dialogue & anticipate emerging issues. Progress may be slow to materialise Weaknesses in enforcement and compliance.
Regional agreements with regulatory provisions
Legal force and direct connection to trade and economic integration. Multiplicity of provisions Impact on regulators?
Area-specific legally binding agreements
Legal force Lack of enforcement in some cases Lack of flexibility to adapt to changes
MR
Preserve State sovereignty Reduce duplication efforts & time to market Time-consuming, costly Extensive trust Adaption with changes in regulations? Lack of enforcement
Transgovernmental networks
Low-cost, flexible and adaptable Foster experimentation & innovation Support trust building, technical approaches & may help avoid race to the bottom Soft law / exchange of practices Limited enforcement and monitoring Exclusion issues? Legitimacy of decisions?
Mutual Recognition: spectrum of modalities
Mutual recognition
- f
rules: equivalent
- bjectives, regulatory requirements, standards,
and conformity assessment procedures Mutual recognition of conformity assessment (procedures / results) for goods under different partner’ rules The EU principle
- f
MR as a corollary of the ‘free movement of goods’ in the non- harmonised sectors The Trans- Tasman Mutual Recognition Agreement MRAs incorporated in RTAs Stand-alone MRAs Government MRAs Non- Government MLAs (between CABs or Accreditation Bodies) Multilateral MRAs (legally non-binding) Bilateral MRAs Agreements on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (ACAAs) Enhanced MRAs (equivalence
- f regulatory
requirements) Traditional MRAs (without equivalence of regulatory requirements)
Source: GOV/RPC(2014)12/REV1
MRAs: benefits, costs & success factors
- (Small) positive impact on trade
- Avoid duplication of test, uncertainty on
rejection & shorten ‘time-to-market’
- Knowledge flows & peer learning
Benefits
- Seen as costly by regulators /admin
- Challenging political economy &
implementation
Costs
- Science-driven domains
- Big global value chains
- Regulatory divergence is not too high
- Confidence / institutional proximity