Internal Controls
Presented by: Patrick Cowen, CPA, CIA, CISA
Internal Controls Presented by: Patrick Cowen, CPA, CIA, CISA Why - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Internal Controls Presented by: Patrick Cowen, CPA, CIA, CISA Why Internal Controls? Prevent and Detect Fraud, Waste and Abuse Motive + Opportunity + Justification = Fraud 2 What Are Internal Controls? Internal Control is a process set by
Presented by: Patrick Cowen, CPA, CIA, CISA
2
+ Opportunity + Justification = Fraud Motive
Internal Control is a process set by management, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in three categories:
3
4
1992 2006 2009 2013
Control Environment Risk Assessment Control Activities Information & Communication Mon
ing Act ctivitie ies
6
8
Management must set the tone. Staff will not use internal controls if management does not take internal controls
10
11
training)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
Act or course of deception, an intentional concealment,
(1) gain unlawful or unfair advantage (2) induce another to part with some valuable item or surrender a legal right (3) inflict injury in some manner. It is a criminal offense.
21
to get paid
promotion
22
23
Fraud Statistics
Demographics: Men 58% Women 42%
and government
24
26
No one employee should control all pieces of the pie!
27
First Audit
Duties were not adequately segregated as a supervisor:
end of each workday
change what had been recorded by someone else
28
collections recorded in the system each day – they showed as “refunds”
refunded in the system!
returned!
Second Audit
29
Estimated $80,000 diverted
30
WHY? Duties were not adequately segregated – office manager had access to both cash and related records; with no compensating controls! What Could Have Been Done?
refunds
activity for anomalies
adoption records in the system
31
Contractor
that neighborhood for 30 months
32
in that neighborhood
$25,000 overpayments resulted
month before they started providing them
33
WHY? Because the contract manager was not reviewing the invoices; relied on administrative staff that were not knowledgeable of the contract details and related amendments. RESULT: Total overpayments of $88,000 and unhappy management!
34
products (systems)
contractor agreed to provide free maintenance on old system for an extended period
through October 31st
35
being replaced, with understanding the City would be credited for any unused months after the City cutover to the new system
provided for the unused portion of prepaid costs for the old system
36
WHY? Because the contract manager was not reviewing the invoices; instead the contract manager relied on administrative staff that were not knowledgeable of the contract details and related amendments RESULT: Total overpayments of $50,000
37
Audit #1:
major projects
manager then reimbursed
twice, in September and then again in subsequent May
38
Audit #2:
project costs incurred
for vendor invoices that were part of initial $45,000
39
Audit #3:
incurred
“additional costs” to “get to the $60,000”
40
WHY? Contract managers were not reviewing invoices in sufficient detail What Could Have Been Done?
invoices
Audit Manager, City of Tallahassee
(850) 891-8065