Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

interaction vertex imaging ivi for carbon ion therapy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring a feasibility study E. Testa 1 , D. Dauvergne 1 , G. Dedes 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring

a feasibility study

  • E. Testa1, D. Dauvergne1, G. Dedes1, N. Freud2,
  • P. Henriquet1, J. Krimmer1, J.M. L´

etang2, C. Ray1, M.-H. Richard1,2, F. Sauli3

1IPNL, France 2CREATIS, France 3TERA Foundation, Italy

ICTR-PHE 2012 Geneva, Switzerland

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 1 / 16

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Outline

  • 1. Ion range verification
  • 2. Interaction Vertex Imaging principles
  • 3. Simulation tools
  • 4. Results

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 2 / 16

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Rationale

Ideal control

  • 3D real-time dose control

Current challenge

  • 1D real-time ion-range

control

  • an energy-slice basis
  • or on a pencil-beam basis

Proton / carbon therapy

  • Beam intensities
  • Nuclear reactions

Typical 12C therapy treatment

Dose 1 GyE Irradiated volume 120 cm3

  • No. of energy slices

39

  • No. of C ions

Total 7 × 108 AVG per energy slice ∼ 2 × 107 AVG per pencil beam ∼ 105

  • M. Kraemer et al. 2000

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 3 / 16

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Physical principles

Correlation between

  • ion range
  • nuclear reaction depth profile

Two kinds of radiations of relevance

  • β+ activity
  • Prompt radiations (γ, p)

Measurement of β+ activity (200 MeV/u 12C in PMMA) Simulation of prompt radiations

Target depth [cm] 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 counts/ion/mm 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03

γ n p α nuclear reactions

C, PMMA target, GEANT4.9.4

12

95MeV/u

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 4 / 16

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

5 modalities

β+ activity (PET)

  • Clinical use
  • off-beam (HIT, NIRS...)
  • in-beam (GSI)
  • Current research
  • Radioactive beams
  • TOF

Prompt radiations

  • Collimated

camera

  • Slit-hole

camera

  • Compton

camera

  • Interaction

Vertex Imaging

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 5 / 16

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Principle and rationale

Principle

  • Detection of secondary protons emitted from incident ions
  • Reconstruction of nuclear reaction positions (“vertex”)
  • Comparison of measured and simulated distributions of

“reconstructed” vertices

Rationale

  • ++ Intrinsic detection efficiency ∼ 1
  • ++ “High” proton emission yield with 12C ion:

Proton yield ∼ γ-ray yield ∼ 10−1 incident 12C

  • - - Attenuation and straggling

in particular: low-energy protons emitted at the end of incident ion ranges Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 6 / 16

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

2 imaging techniques

Imaging techniques

  • “Single-proton” imaging (SP-IVI)

Intersection of a secondary-proton trajectory with the incident-ion trajectory

  • “Double-proton” imaging (DP-IVI)

Intersection of 2 secondary-proton trajectories

Detectors

  • Tracker + beam hodoscope

(in coincidence) Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 7 / 16

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Simulated setups

Tool

  • Geant4 9.1
  • Nuclear models

QMD (Quantum Molecular Dynamics)

Targets

  • Cylindrical
  • Head phantom

2 trackers

  • 10 × 10 cm2 pixelized detectors

(CMOS)

100 mm

C

20°

12

Cylindrical target

250 mm 50 mm 200 mm Tracker

C

Projectile-like fragment 20° p

12

Head phantom Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 8 / 16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Reconstruction

Basic reconstruction

  • Line intersection
  • Segment S : the smallest distance between trajectories
  • Vertex location: middle of S

Future reconstruction

  • Most Likely Path

Incident C

12

"Double-proton" imaging "Single-proton" imaging

(beam hodoscope) Reconstructed vertex Segment S Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 9 / 16

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Simulation validations: nuclear reactions

Experimental setup

128 mm

C

Detection angle

12

Experimental setup

210 mm

Beam Target energy thickness (MeV) (mm) Our GSI 310 210 experiments GANIL 95 50 Gunzert-Marx et al. 200 128

Results

  • Good overall agreement

for E ≤ 200 MeV Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 10 / 16

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Depth profile of generated vertices

100 mm

200 MeV/u C

12

PMMA target

  • Secondaries

Important contribution

  • Contrast

Relatively low: 1.3 Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 11 / 16

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Depth profile of reconstructed vertices

100 mm

C

20°

12

Cylindrical target

  • Imaging technique

“Single proton” ⇒ higher statistics

  • Contrast

Promising (∼ 5) Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 12 / 16

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Ion-range influence

Vertex Yield vs ion-range

  • Strong dependence

Fit function

  • y = a + b erf(x − IPP)
  • IPP: Inflection-Point Position

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 13 / 16

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Ion-range resolution

Standard deviation of IPP

Number of incident ions 200 400 600 800 1000

3

10 × 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Entries 1000 Mean 54.73 RMS 0.04046 ± 1.809

(mm) 45 50 55 60 65 Counts 50 100

Entries 1000 Mean 54.73 RMS 0.04046 ± 1.809

Position IPP

IPP Standard deviation of (mm)

(Beam energy: 200 MeV/u)

  • Homogeneous target
  • Millimetric resolution
  • n a pencil-beam basis (105 ions)

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 14 / 16

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Conclusion

Feasibility study

  • Geant4 9.1 (validated against experimental data)
  • Elementary vertex reconstruction

Main results

  • “Single-proton” imaging choice
  • Real-time ion range verification (on a pencil-beam basis)

Henriquet et al., submitted to PMB Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 15 / 16

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Ion range verification Interaction Vertex Imaging principles Simulation tools Results Conclusion and perspectives

Perspectives

Detailed study of inhomogeneity influences

  • IVI sensitivity to inhomogeneities at the end of ion path

(low probabilibity of proton escape)

  • Inhomogeneities in the “exit channel material”

In-beam tests with CMOS detectors

  • Low and high energies
  • GANIL (95 MeV/u)
  • HIT (200-300 MeV/u)
  • Analysis in progress

Interaction Vertex Imaging (IVI) for carbon ion therapy monitoring 16 / 16