Insurance Industry Climate Change Roundtable GRC Climate Finance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

insurance industry climate change roundtable
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Insurance Industry Climate Change Roundtable GRC Climate Finance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Insurance Industry Climate Change Roundtable GRC Climate Finance Series September 18, 2015 R OUNDTABLE P ARTNERS CEO network supporting the implementation of the City of Boston Climate Initiative of the UN Office Action Plan for Disaster


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Insurance Industry Climate Change Roundtable

September 18, 2015

GRC Climate Finance Series

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ROUNDTABLE PARTNERS

2

CEO network supporting the implementation of the City of Boston Climate Action Plan Initiative of the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction Core partner with AR!SE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PRELIMINARY CONTEXT

www.theriseinitiative.org

3 September 18, 2015

We have regulators and regulated in the room. We are operating under Chatham House Rules to provide a “safe harbor” for sharing insights We are looking to create a partnership with the local insurance and finance sector to align insurance incentives and loan underwriting with best practices in Building Resilience Measures Our intent is identify specific actions to take to increase climate resilience of coastal urban properties We are focused on limited set of perils: storm surge, precipitation-based flooding, sea level rise, and extreme heat and wind events. We have a number

  • f competitors in

the room, please remember and respect antitrust statement

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ANTITRUST STATEMENT

Please be reminded that you should never discuss or agree with a competitor concerning any of the following subjects:

  • Prices, future prices, pricing or pricing policies; buyers and sellers alike have a

legal right to buy and sell in a market untainted by anticompetitive agreements, including anticompetitive informal, unwritten understandings;

  • Specific terms or conditions of doing business with customers; such as specific

credit terms and credit availability, discounts, rebates, warranty terms, return policies, and so forth (subjects are viewed by the antitrust authorities as directly or indirectly affecting prices);

  • Profits or profit margins; specifically related to a customer and/or product;
  • Specific market shares; of your organization or any competitor;
  • The nature of a specific bid; including one’s intent to bid/not to bid, for particular

business;

  • A willingness to serve only certain customers or territories; or to build only

certain types of products;

  • An intention or willingness not to serve a particular customer; to purchase only

from a particular supplier, or to restrict existing or future cooperation with another competitor; and

  • Negative, derogatory or untruthful remarks; about any supplier, distributor or

customer

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SETTING THE LOCAL CONTEXT

  • Boston is the fourth most at risk city in the U.S. for

costs of damage from coastal flooding

  • End of Century sea level rise is likely to be in the 5

foot range

  • The City of Boston is launching a major Climate

Preparedness Initiative

  • Boston’s economic future depends on property

insurance being available and affordable

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

7% OF BOSTON FLOODED

100-year flood level in 2015 = annual flood in 2050 = daily high tide in 2100

Colored Area = Today’s high tide, plus 5.0 feet of SLR and storm surge

Source: Preparing for the Rising Tide, Boston Harbor Association, 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

30% OF BOSTON FLOODED

100-year flood in 2050  annual flood in 2100

Colored Area = Today’s high tide, plus 7.5 feet of SLR and storm surge

Source: Preparing for the Rising Tide, Boston Harbor Association, 2013

slide-8
SLIDE 8

THE CHALLENGE

8

How do we maintain long-term property value and insurability in Boston, in light of projected climate risks?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

MILESTONES

February 2013 Mayor Menino asks the GRC to form a Climate Preparedness Working Group. November 2013 GRC Working Group delivers its recommendations to the November GRC meeting, including insurance recommendations. March 2015 US launch of AR!SE held in Boston, with a breakout session on Insurance and Finance September 2015 Insurance Climate Roundtable

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GRC NOV. 2013 INSURANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

“The goal of these recommendations is to build a partnership between local insurers, financial institutions and property owners to align insurance policies with desired property resilience actions and create access to capital to finance those actions. 1.Define resilience standards for existing buildings. 2.Work with insurance brokers and property owner trade associations to educate property owners regarding climate risks and resilience 3.Improve awareness and understanding of resilience insurance and finance products and services. 4.Work with the State Insurance Commissioner to encourage climate-smart insurance policies.”

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AR!SE BOSTON LAUNCH DISCUSSION Q’S

1) How should insurance companies embed risk tolerances into short and long term policies and approaches? 2) What regulatory and legal changes can help promote investment in resilience? 3) How can Boston demonstrate leadership in creating resilient finance and insurance approaches?

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TODAY’S DISCUSSION HITS ALL AR!SE THEMES

12

✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Strategies Investment metrics Benchmarking & Standards Education & Training Legal & Regulatory Cities Insurance

AR!SE

Themes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

“IT’S COMPLICATED”

13

Stakeholders In “Keeping Boston Insurable” Property Owners City Government Insurers & Reinsurers Taxpayers Financiers Regulators Tenants

slide-14
SLIDE 14

“IT’S REALLY COMPLICATED!”

City government

  • Must coordinate

resiliency actions at macro level

  • Concerned with

long-term ability of city to recover from disasters

  • Primary player

to orchestrate actions at regional and/or community level

  • Experimenting

with models of insurance to protect assets (Re)insurers

  • Issues 1+ year

policies that do not align with long-term risks

  • Covers specific

perils, not broad “climate risk” coverage

  • Exclude certain

perils (heat events, flood/sea level rise)

  • Limited by

regulation or reinsurance considerations Regulators

  • Insurance

markets “highly regulated, short-term, backward looking and slow to innovate”

  • Regulation

written by separate state insurance commissioners

  • Limited

incentives to coordinate on regional and/or national basis Tenants

  • Short-term

perspective; can quickly move

  • ut of “at risk

properties”

  • Limited and/or

no responsibility for resiliency

  • No incentives to

invest in rented property

  • Limited

incentive to pay premium rents for risk-resilient properties Financiers

  • Limited interest

in resiliency improvements as they do not usually hold investments for entire asset life

  • Hard to

leverage potential tax benefits

  • Does not

manage properties; limited authority to promote improvements Citizens and taxpayers

  • Often most “at

risk” stakeholders (taxpayers may act as “funders

  • f last resort”)
  • Do not

understand Gordian knot of

  • wnership and

responsibilities

  • Mobilized by

media and stakeholders who might have incomplete data Property

  • wners
  • Resiliency

actions not sufficient to “move the needle” on an individual basis

  • More effective

efforts exist at portfolio and/or community level

  • As no “reward”

exists for taking action, property

  • wners have

few incentives to improve properties

WHO ARE SOME OF THE KEY PLAYERS AND WHAT ARE THEIR MOTIVATIONS?

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

OUR TEAM EXPERIENCE…

“Good heavens, Stuart. We are going to need the net!”

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

WHATWEWANTTO ACCOMPLISHTODAY

  • 1. Advance a common definition of Building

Resilience Measures

  • 2. Create strategies for engagement between

insurance and property owners

  • 3. Understand City of Boston current/proposed

activities and how property owners and insurers can support them

  • 4. Develop a shared agenda for State policy changes

to align insurance and building code practices

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

REMEMBERTHE CHALLENGE

17

How do we maintain long-term property value and insurability in Boston, in light of projected climate risks?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

AGENDA REVIEW – AM

Time Topic Presenter 9:20 Resiliency Challenges in Massachusetts Daniel Judson, MA Commissioner

  • f Insurance

9:30 What Actions Is the Federal Government Taking? Samantha Medlock, White House CEQ 9:55 FEMA’s Role in Perils Facing Boston Dean Savramis, FEMA Region 1 10:15 Why Are Resilience Investments Important? Peter Civitenga, AIR 10:45 Break 11:00 Framing Insurance Markets Cynthia McHale, Ceres 11:10 What Products and Services Are in the Local Market? Nick Shufro, PwC 11:25 Innovation Example – Reinsurance Kirk Metcalf, Willis 11:35 Innovation Example – Resilience Standards Doug Pierce, Perkins + Will 11:50 Going Beyond Boston and the Commonwealth Nick Shufro, PwC Glenn Dolcemascolo, UNISDR Olivia Darby, Willis 12:00 Pre-Lunch Wrap Up and Discussion John Cleveland, GRC

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

AGENDA REVIEW – PM

Time Topic Presenter 12:20 Lunch and Presentation: “Resiliency Plans and the Climate Action Plan” Austin Blackmon, Chief of Energy, Environment and Open Space, City of Boston 1:00 What Is the City of Boston Do to Advance Resiliency in the Property Sector? Carl Spector, City of Boston 1:30 How Can State Insurance Policies Advance Climate Resilience in the Property Sector? Cynthia McHale, Ceres George Bradner, Connecticut Katherine Greig, New York City Daniel Judson, Massachusetts Macky McCleary, Rhode Island 2:30 Break 2:45 Voice of the Customer –What Do We Need to Do to Improve Resilience? David Straus, ABC David Begelfer, NAIOP Greg Vasil, GBREB 3:15 Next Steps and Closing John Cleveland, GRC 3:30 Adjourn

19