Instrumental Challenges in Polarization Observations using Large - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

instrumental challenges in polarization observations
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Instrumental Challenges in Polarization Observations using Large - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Instrumental Challenges in Polarization Observations using Large Interferometry Chau Ching Chiong (ASIAA) SKA Science Workshop in East Asia, Nagoya, Jun. 7 2013 Outline Polarization observation overview Source of polarization leakage


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Instrumental Challenges in Polarization Observations using Large Interferometry

Chau Ching Chiong (ASIAA)

SKA Science Workshop in East Asia, Nagoya, Jun. 7 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Polarization observation overview
  • Source of polarization leakage
  • ALMA Band-1 front-end system
  • Current receiver performance
  • Current receiver performance
  • Ways for improvement
  • Summary
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Polarization Observation

Probing Magnetic Field:

  • Synchrotron radiation
  • Faraday rotatoin
  • Goldreich-Kylafis effect < 5%

Girart+ (2006)

  • Goldreich-Kylafis effect < 5%
  • AGN polarization: 5-10%
  • Dust polarization: 1%
  • Zeeman effect: 0.1%
  • CMB polarization

Crutcher+ (1999)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Polarization Leakage in Interferometry

  • For linear feed like ALMA. X/Y-signal leakage to Y/X-

feed.

  • Stokes I signal goes into Q, U, and V, and generates

“instrumental polarization”.

  • Neglecting higher order terms (small leakage),
  • Neglecting higher order terms (small leakage),

G and D need to be determined

Parallactic angle

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Characterization of Instrumental Effects

  • Time-invariant

– Antenna – Optics – Feedhorn

OMT Feedhorn

– Feedhorn – Orthomode Transducer

  • Time-variant

– Front-end (amplifier, mixer) gain – Back-end

RF LNA mixer LO LO IF LNA To back-end (correlator etc.)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ALMA Band-1 Project Overview

  • Led by ALMA-EA (ASIAA)
  • Cooperation with HIA

(Canada), NRAO (USA) and U Chile.

  • Freq.: 35-52 GHz in SSB
  • peration
  • Receiver Noise Temp.: 25-32

K (expected) @ 15K

  • PDR in July 2013
  • CDR in 2014
  • End of project: Summer 2019
slide-7
SLIDE 7

ALMA Band-1 Polarimetry

  • Unique science: Zeeman Measurement via

circular polarization (Stokes V)

  • CCS(43-32) f= 45.379033 GHz
  • Dense core
  • Detect 1mG in

hours

1 hr integration 10 hr integration

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Summary of Instrumental Leakage

  • Antenna: geometry is given: beam squint is proportional

to the offset distance

  • Optics + Feedhorn < -40 dB (1%) (band center); < -30

dB (3%) (band edge)

  • OMT < -40 dB (< 1%)
  • OMT < -40 dB (< 1%)
  • Amplifier gain: < 0.1% (spec.) but sensitive to ambient

temperature drifting.

  • Antenna deformation is not obvious.
  • Maximum deviation in D-term (ALMA spec.): -12 dB (6%)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Typical Calibration Strategies

  • Determine the Jones/Mueller matrix.
  • Calibration source is slightly linear polarized.
  • Using long observation on calibration source with

different parallactic angle. Source polarization is rotating with the sky but instrumental polarization is fixed.

– Time consuming.

  • After calibration, error is of order of 0.1% of Stokes I.
  • After calibration, error is of order of 0.1% of Stokes I.

From Johnston 2002

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Current VLA and ALMA Receiver Performance

VLA:

  • D ~ 1% at low frequency (C-, X-band), 5-6% at high

frequency (K-, Q-band)

  • Not time-stable.

ALMA: ALMA:

  • Nagai et al. (2012) measured the polarization

performance of current ALMA Band-3, 6 and 7.

  • D-term in Band-3 < 3%, Band-6 < 5%.
  • Each antenna has its own feature.
  • Off- beam axis degradation. Best at phase center.
  • Time variation of 10% over two days, mostly from front-

end electronics(?).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

D-Term Time Variation in ALMA

From Nagai+ 2012

Different Date Frequent calibration required

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ways for Improvement (1)

  • In ALMA, time-variant error

causes problem in high sensitivity polarization measurements.

  • Adding correlated noise source.
  • Adding half/quarter-wave plate to

provide higher flexibility in provide higher flexibility in calibration. – Half-wave plate exchanges the polarization state of two linear polarization. – Quarter-wave plate changes linear into circular feed (or vice versa).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ways for Improvement (2)

  • For ALMA Band-1 or future SKA, stable and powerful

calibration source with high signal-to-noise ratio and changeable polarization feature is possible.

  • Photonic phase calibrator: one of the ALMA-EA

development item led by Dr. Hitoshi Kiuchi (NAOJ).

From Kiuchi

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary

  • The origins of the polarization leakage are

identified.

  • D-term is in a few %, with off-beam center

degradation. degradation.

  • There are two component corrupting the

polarization: time-invariant and time-variant.

  • Time-invariant should be antenna based.
  • Time-variant needs more investigations.
  • Applying experience from ALMA to SKA.