Injunctions: Its not all about you Injunctions are not always - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

injunctions it s not all about you
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Injunctions: Its not all about you Injunctions are not always - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Injunctions: Its not all about you Injunctions are not always available But they need to be taken seriously So how do injunctions fit into the bigger picture? Asserting and Defending Patents The Outcome Drives the


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Injunctions: It’s not all about you

  • Injunctions are not always available
  • But they need to be taken seriously
  • So how do injunctions fit into the bigger picture?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Asserting and Defending Patents

  • The Outcome Drives the Licensing Terms
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Asserting and Defending Patents Outcome

No lawsuit

Walk away License

Lawsuit

Past

Reas. Royalty

Future

Injunction Need to sue again Lump Sum Ongoing Royalty

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NTP v RIM

(>600M; settlement on eve of injunction)

Outcome

No lawsuit

Walk away License

Lawsuit

Past

Reas. Royalty

Future

Injunction Need to sue again Lump Sum Ongoing Royalty

slide-6
SLIDE 6

3Com v Xircom (Intel subsidiary)

(15M with cross-license; settlement upon preliminary injunction)

Outcome

No lawsuit

Walk away License

Lawsuit

Past

Reas. Royalty

Future

Injunction Need to sue again Lump Sum Ongoing Royalty

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Outcome

No lawsuit

Walk away License

Lawsuit

Past

Reas. Royalty

Future

Injunction Need to sue again Lump Sum Ongoing Royalty

Assertion v Family Owned Bus. (true story) (Self Imposed Inj.; settlement before trial) (in lieu of Ongoing Royalty Agreement)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Paice v Toyota ($25/$98 of $6500 portion of hybrid revenue) (Jury verdict reas. royalty; judge determination of ongoing royalty)

  • - $98 per vehicle is 17% of 9% profit margin

Outcome

No lawsuit

Walk away License

Lawsuit

Past

Reas. Royalty

Future

Injunction Need to sue again Lump Sum Ongoing Royalty

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Douglas v Buyers (3.3%/6%) (Jury verdict reas. royalty; judge determination of ongoing royalty)

  • - case involved non-pioneering patents; percent profit big factor

Outcome

No lawsuit

Walk away License

Lawsuit

Past

Reas. Royalty

Future

Injunction Need to sue again Lump Sum Ongoing Royalty

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Patent Holder’s Perspective

  • Do not rule out injunctive relief automatically
  • Do not undervalue the effect of an ongoing royalty
  • Do not use a cookie cutter approach to licensing

unless you are sure it is right for your business

  • You do not have to agree to terms not good for your

business

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Targeted Party’s Perspective

  • Fight the royalty rates hard (but be careful)
  • Keep in mind that lower royalties could mean an

injuction or noninfringement (i.e., a de facto injunction) are options

  • Do not completely ignore the percent profit factor
  • Even without an injuction, ongoing royalties can be

substantial

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Take Aways

  • The law on

injunctive relief is in flux

  • The law on

damages is in flux

  • Negotiation

decisions are still key