Industries Should Know . Presentation to Perkins Coie Emerging - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
industries should know
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Industries Should Know . Presentation to Perkins Coie Emerging - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 23, 2023 172 likes •292 views

Antitrust and HSR: What Companies in Emerging Industries Should Know . Presentation to Perkins Coie Emerging Companies and Venture Capital Law Group June 27, 2017 Barry Reingold Betsy Kristoferson Perkins Coie LLP Investopedia Definition

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Perkins Coie LLP

Antitrust and HSR: What Companies in Emerging Industries Should Know

.

Presentation to Perkins Coie Emerging Companies and Venture Capital Law Group

June 27, 2017 Barry Reingold Betsy Kristoferson

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

Investopedia Definition of 'Emerging Industry'

  • A group of companies in a line of business formed around a new

product or idea that is in the early stages of development. An emerging industry typically consists of just a few companies and is often centered around a new technology . . . [I]t may be difficult to secure financing to grow the company [and] marketing expenses are high, because the product or service for sale is often unproven and companies in an emerging industry must convince both investors and consumers that the product or service they are selling is valuable. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/emergingindustry.asp

  • So what does antitrust have to do with my

clients?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

Sherman Antitrust Act (15 USC §1, 2)

3

  • Prohibits contracts, combinations and conspiracies in restraint of

trade (multi-party conduct) and monopolization and attempted monopolization (single firm conduct)

  • Other than per se violations, plaintiff or US Government typically

must show defendant has "market power:"

  • The ability of a firm within a relevant market to profitably raise

prices above the competitive level for a sustained period of time

  • “Profitably" means the firm doesn't lose so many sales that the

price increase is not profitable

  • Again, what does antitrust have to do with

my clients?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

Typically, very little, but watch out for

4

  • Transactions between actual or potential competitors involving critical IP
  • Example, IP cross licenses that allocate future R&D efforts, customers or

prices

  • IP rights do not of themselves constitute "market power" for antitrust

purposes, but are an important factor in determining whether market power exists

  • Transactions involving "industry roll ups"
  • Serial acquisitions of companies in the same emerging industry
  • Transactions that constitute per se antitrust violations (like price fixing) or

involve products that may be used to facilitate per se violations

  • Example, automatic price equalization software
  • United States v. Ashton, N.D. Cal. 2015 (criminal complaint alleging

competing wall poster vendors adopted algorithms developed by one vendor to equalize prices)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

Interlocking directorates (Clayton Act § 8)

5

  • No person may serve as a director or board-elected or appointed
  • fficer of two or more competing firms where an agreement between

them restricting competition would be a per se violation of the Sherman Act (for example, price fixing).

  • DoJ and FTC have taken position “person” may be a corporate entity

(for example, a VC firm) that appoints a different employee to sit as the firm’s representative on each corporate board.

  • Prohibition applies only where the “capital, surplus and undivided

profits” of each interlocked firm exceeds an inflation-adjusted threshold, currently $32.9 million.

  • Exemptions exist for interlocks involving firms with very small
  • verlapping sales
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

HSR obligations

6

  • A reporting obligation, not a substantive antitrust law
  • Reporting doesn’t turn on whether proposed transaction poses

antitrust concerns

  • Transaction must satisfy two tests, which are currently:
  • Size of transaction: $80.8 million
  • Size of person: for transactions valued at under $323 million
  • one person has sales or total assets of $161.5 million,
  • the other person has total assets of $16.2 million, or, if a

manufacturer, sales of $16.2 million

  • Size of transaction and size of person thresholds adjusted annually

based on changes to GNP

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

The "person" is the "ultimate parent entity“ and all entities it controls

7

  • The UPE is the entity in the corporate ladder that is not "controlled"

by another entity

  • For voting securities, "control" means holding 50% or more of

another entity's voting stock, or the right to designate 50% or more

  • f that entity’s board of directors
  • Stock ownership percentage calculations must take into account

differences in voting power between different classes of stock

  • For LLC interests, “control” means having the right to 50% or more
  • f the LLC’s profits or 50% or more of its assets upon dissolution
  • Holdings of spouses and minor children are aggregated
  • Holdings of a settlor are aggregated with holdings of revocable trust,
  • r irrevocable trust in which settlor retains a reversionary interest
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

Voting securities and LLC interests are treated differently

8

  • Any acquisition of voting securities is

potentially reportable

  • Only acquisitions of a "controlling" interest in

an LLC are reportable

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

HSR applies to stock purchases by officers and directors who do not control the target for HSR purposes

9

  • Acquisitions of stock during early stages when target was too small to

meet the meet size of person test do not become reportable based

  • n later increases in target value
  • But further acquisitions of stock (even a single share) may be

reportable if the buyer's aggregate holdings will meet or exceed the size of transaction threshold, currently $80.8 million

  • Exemption exists for transactions in which an officer, director or large

shareholder’s per centum holdings do not increase, as is typically the case for later round financings, IPOs and sales of target stock in which the early shareholders retain their stock interests

  • But post-event acquisitions of stock may be reportable if the

buyer’s aggregate holdings will meet or exceed the size of transaction threshold, currently $80.8 million

  • In stock-for-stock deals, acquisitions of the buyer’s voting securities

by the target’s officers or directors or largest shareholders may be independently reportable (‘two way deal”)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

Good news

10

  • In the sale of a target, to-be-retired target debt (including debt owed

to the target’s shareholders) may be deducted from the purchase price when determining whether size of transaction test is met

  • Where HSR violations are discovered after closing, the FTC adheres

to a "one free bite" rule regarding penalties (currently up to $40,654 per day). No penalties will be sought where

  • There have been no previous violations by the buyer
  • The violation is voluntarily brought to the FTC's attention
  • The violation was inadvertent
  • The buyer explains the circumstances surrounding the violation,

how it was discovered, and describes procedures put in place to ensure no future violations

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Perkins Coie LLP | PerkinsCoie.com

QUESTIONS?

11