Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia A Case Study with an OvaHerero - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

indigenous knowledge for wikipedia
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia A Case Study with an OvaHerero - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia A Case Study with an OvaHerero Community in Eastern Namibia Peter Gallert, Heike WinschiersTheophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel GonzalezCabrero, Bobby Shabangu Namibia University of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia

A Case Study with an OvaHerero Community in Eastern Namibia Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu

Namibia University of Science and Technology www.nust.na

November 2016

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 1 / 9

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Chapter Outline

1

Wikipedia Overview The encyclopedia Wikipedia in Namibia Value Clash

2

Experiment in Otjinene Setup Results

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 2 / 9

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Wikipedia Overview The encyclopedia

The 21st century encyclopedia

Started 2001, open source, content licensed under CC-BY-SA 36 million articles, 291 languages Largest edition: English, 5.2 million articles, 10 billion page views the Internet’s largest and most popular general reference work Written by about 90,000 volunteers 21st century’s outline, bibliography, and definition of knowledge

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 3 / 9

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Wikipedia Overview The encyclopedia

The 21st century encyclopedia

Started 2001, open source, content licensed under CC-BY-SA 36 million articles, 291 languages Largest edition: English, 5.2 million articles, 10 billion page views the Internet’s largest and most popular general reference work Written by about 90,000 volunteers 21st century’s outline, bibliography, and definition of knowledge

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 3 / 9

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Wikipedia Overview Wikipedia in Namibia

Wikipedia’s relevance for Namibia

available in English, German, Afrikaans, Chinese, Portuguese

. . . the native tongues of former and current colonial masters 3 editors are actively writing about Namibia—2 Germans, 1 Australian ⇒ ‘Namibian narrative’ again told from an alien perspective

Namibian indigenous people are not contributing Several inhibiting factors explaining low participation (literacy, affluence, access, and so on) But where are the factors explaining no participation? Probable reason: cultural values clash

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 4 / 9

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Wikipedia Overview Wikipedia in Namibia

Wikipedia’s relevance for Namibia

available in English, German, Afrikaans, Chinese, Portuguese

. . . the native tongues of former and current colonial masters 3 editors are actively writing about Namibia—2 Germans, 1 Australian ⇒ ‘Namibian narrative’ again told from an alien perspective

Namibian indigenous people are not contributing Several inhibiting factors explaining low participation (literacy, affluence, access, and so on) But where are the factors explaining no participation? Probable reason: cultural values clash

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 4 / 9

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Wikipedia Overview Wikipedia in Namibia

Wikipedia’s relevance for Namibia

available in English, German, Afrikaans, Chinese, Portuguese

. . . the native tongues of former and current colonial masters 3 editors are actively writing about Namibia—2 Germans, 1 Australian ⇒ ‘Namibian narrative’ again told from an alien perspective

Namibian indigenous people are not contributing Several inhibiting factors explaining low participation (literacy, affluence, access, and so on) But where are the factors explaining no participation? Probable reason: cultural values clash

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 4 / 9

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Wikipedia Overview Value Clash

Wikipedia editors vs. Ovaherero community

Multiple clashes of values, on several levels, across all areas of human organisation Related research:

Gallert & Winschiers–Theophilus & Kapuire & Stanley (2016): Clashes in trust, ownership and property, usability, courtesy, collaboration Gallert & van der Velden (2015) : Oral versus written organisation

  • f knowledge

Oral citations not allowed on English Wikipedia Attacked as being unreliable, unverifiable, not peer–reviewed, instable over time, in short: chit–chat Oral narratives relate to chit–chat like opera arias to bathroom singing!

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 5 / 9

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Wikipedia Overview Value Clash

Wikipedia editors vs. Ovaherero community

Multiple clashes of values, on several levels, across all areas of human organisation Related research:

Gallert & Winschiers–Theophilus & Kapuire & Stanley (2016): Clashes in trust, ownership and property, usability, courtesy, collaboration Gallert & van der Velden (2015) : Oral versus written organisation

  • f knowledge

Oral citations not allowed on English Wikipedia Attacked as being unreliable, unverifiable, not peer–reviewed, instable over time, in short: chit–chat Oral narratives relate to chit–chat like opera arias to bathroom singing!

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 5 / 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Wikipedia Overview Value Clash

Wikipedia editors vs. Ovaherero community

Multiple clashes of values, on several levels, across all areas of human organisation Related research:

Gallert & Winschiers–Theophilus & Kapuire & Stanley (2016): Clashes in trust, ownership and property, usability, courtesy, collaboration Gallert & van der Velden (2015) : Oral versus written organisation

  • f knowledge

Oral citations not allowed on English Wikipedia Attacked as being unreliable, unverifiable, not peer–reviewed, instable over time, in short: chit–chat Oral narratives relate to chit–chat like opera arias to bathroom singing!

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 5 / 9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Experiment in Otjinene Setup

Oral Citations Experiment

1

Create a list of Wikipedia articles that cannot properly be sourced

2

Experienced Wikipedia editors edit an article with all available

  • nline sources (Call for Participation)

3

Selected attendees travel to Namibia

4

Add offline knowledge from the local Namibiana library section

5

Remaining ’white spaces’ ⇒ interview topics 3 editors + a translator + a film maker One afternoon in the village of Otjinene, Eastern Namibia, rural setting One couple of elders (husband and wife) interviewed for an afternoon (further data collected in the mean time)

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 6 / 9

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Experiment in Otjinene Setup

Oral Citations Experiment

1

Create a list of Wikipedia articles that cannot properly be sourced

2

Experienced Wikipedia editors edit an article with all available

  • nline sources (Call for Participation)

3

Selected attendees travel to Namibia

4

Add offline knowledge from the local Namibiana library section

5

Remaining ’white spaces’ ⇒ interview topics 3 editors + a translator + a film maker One afternoon in the village of Otjinene, Eastern Namibia, rural setting One couple of elders (husband and wife) interviewed for an afternoon (further data collected in the mean time)

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 6 / 9

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Experiment in Otjinene Setup

An Elder Tells a Tale

the Herero elder (hat, knife, stick, and chair) pondering what to answer

Figure: picture by Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, CC-BY-SA 4.0

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 7 / 9

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Experiment in Otjinene Results

Results and Implications

White spaces in Wikipedia articles could be filled Answers regularly appear as riddles, also in further interviews Results at Wikipedia:Oral citations experiment Policy debate still outstanding Wikimedia Foundation supportive in money and morale Interviewing is no outsiders’ job Insider knowledge required to ask questions Insider knowledge required to understand answers (Amusing details in the paper) Ideal people for this role: Community’s own offspring

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 8 / 9

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Experiment in Otjinene Results

Results and Implications

White spaces in Wikipedia articles could be filled Answers regularly appear as riddles, also in further interviews Results at Wikipedia:Oral citations experiment Policy debate still outstanding Wikimedia Foundation supportive in money and morale Interviewing is no outsiders’ job Insider knowledge required to ask questions Insider knowledge required to understand answers (Amusing details in the paper) Ideal people for this role: Community’s own offspring

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 8 / 9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Experiment in Otjinene Results

End of Presentation

“Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That’s what we’re doing.” —Jimbo Wales, emphases ours

Any questions?

These slides are available on Wikimedia Commons under CC-BY-SA 4.0

Peter Gallert, Heike Winschiers–Theophilus, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Colin Stanley, Daniel Gonzalez–Cabrero, Bobby Shabangu (NUST) Indigenous Knowledge for Wikipedia November 2016 9 / 9