Indicators Four areas of institutional effectiveness Student - - PDF document

12/28/2016 1

Indicators

• Four areas of institutional effectiveness

– Student Achievement – Fiscal Stability – State and Federal Programmatic Compliance – Accreditation

• Specific indicators identified by IE indicators

workgroup with broad stakeholder involvement

2

12/28/2016 2

Year 3 Indicators

Year 3 Additions

• Transfer‐level Math/English Completion Rate

– Year 1 and Year 2

• Number of low‐unit certificates
• Median time to degree
• Number of CDCP awards
• Noncredit fill‐in‐the‐blank
• CTE Skills Builder
• District participation rate for the 18‐24 year old population
• OPEB Liability

No New Required Goalsetting

4

12/28/2016 3

Transfer‐level Math/English Completion Rate Year 1 and Year 2

• Cohort: First‐time students who complete 6 units

and attempt any math OR English in their first year

• Metric: Percent who complete a transfer‐level

course in math (for the math rate) or English (for the English rate) in their first two years.

5 6

12/28/2016 4

Number of low‐unit certificates

• The number of certificates less than 18 units

awarded by academic year

• Includes non‐Chancellor’s Office approved

certificates.

7

Median time to degree

• The median number of years from the time
• f a student’s first enrollment in a CCC until

the time they receive an AA, AS, or ADT degree.

8

12/28/2016 5

Number of CDCP awards

• Number of CDCP certificates awarded by

academic year.

9

Noncredit fill‐in‐the‐blank

• Open field for colleges to identify their

preferred metric to track effectiveness related to noncredit programs.

10

12/28/2016 6

CTE Skills Builder

• Median percentage change in wages for

students who completed higher level CTE coursework in a given year and left the system without receiving any type of traditional outcome such as transfer to a four year college or completion of a degree

• r certificate.

– Aggregated by college

11

District participation rate for 18‐24 year old population

• Percent of the 18‐24 year old population

within district boundaries that are enrolled in a CCC in that district.

• Both an access and fiscal viability metric

12

12/28/2016 7

OPEB Liability

• Self‐reported percentage of the OPEB

liability that the district's set‐ aside funds represents (includes both funds in a trust and outside of a trust and designated for this liability).

13

Year 4: Non‐Credit Course Success Rate

• Only applicable to those reporting grades for

non‐credit.

• “SP” Grade approved by BOG in September

14