incremental consistency guarantees
play

Incremental Consistency Guarantees For Replicated Objects Rachid - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Incremental Consistency Guarantees For Replicated Objects Rachid Guerraoui, Matej Pavlovic, Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION replicate Incremental Consistency Guarantees Incremental Consistency Guarantees 2 Dragos-Adrian


  1. Incremental Consistency Guarantees For Replicated Objects Rachid Guerraoui, Matej Pavlovic, Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  2. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION replicate Incremental Consistency Guarantees Incremental Consistency Guarantees 2 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  3. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION 20 Number of recent events 
 22 17 on the user’s timeline replicate Incremental Consistency Guarantees Incremental Consistency Guarantees 2 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  4. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION 20 Number of recent events 
 22 17 on the user’s timeline replicate Strong Consistency • Returns the correct data 22 • Latency: ~200 ms • Can become unavailable [CAP], [PACELC] Incremental Consistency Guarantees Incremental Consistency Guarantees 2 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  5. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION 20 Number of recent events 
 22 17 on the user’s timeline replicate Strong Consistency Weak Consistency • Returns the correct data • Latency: ~100 ms 22 • Latency: ~200 ms • High availability • Can become unavailable • Allows inconsistencies: can return [CAP], [PACELC] or or 20 17 22 Incremental Consistency Guarantees Incremental Consistency Guarantees 2 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  6. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION 20 Number of recent events 
 22 17 on the user’s timeline replicate Strong Consistency Weak Consistency • Returns the correct data • Latency: ~100 ms 22 Neither model is ideal! • Latency: ~200 ms • High availability • Can become unavailable • Allows inconsistencies: can return [CAP], [PACELC] or or 20 17 22 Incremental Consistency Guarantees Incremental Consistency Guarantees 2 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  7. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION 20 Number of recent events 
 22 17 on the user’s timeline replicate Strong Consistency Weak Consistency • Returns the correct data • Latency: ~100 ms 22 Neither model is ideal! • Latency: ~200 ms • High availability • Can become unavailable • Allows inconsistencies: can return We use both models. [CAP], [PACELC] or or 20 17 22 Incremental Consistency Guarantees Incremental Consistency Guarantees 2 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  8. Multiple models 1. Weak consistency 
 100ms 20 2. Strong consistency 
 300ms 22 Incremental Consistency Guarantees 3 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  9. Increasingly many systems expose 
 Multiple models multiple consistency models: 1. Weak consistency 
 Dynamo 
 100ms 20 [SOSP’07] Pileus 
 2. Strong consistency 
 [SOSP’13] 300ms 22 Incremental Consistency Guarantees 3 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  10. Increasingly many systems expose 
 Multiple models multiple consistency models: 1. Weak consistency 
 Dynamo 
 100ms 20 [SOSP’07] Pileus 
 2. Strong consistency 
 [SOSP’13] 300ms 22 Issues 1. Send multiple requests? 2. How to leverage individual responses? 3. Semantics? 4. … Incremental Consistency Guarantees 3 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  11. Increasingly many systems expose 
 Multiple models multiple consistency models: 1. Weak consistency 
 Dynamo 
 100ms 20 [SOSP’07] Pileus 
 2. Strong consistency 
 [SOSP’13] 300ms 22 Issues Problem 1. Send multiple requests? How do you program with 2. How to leverage individual responses? ★ inconsistencies? 3. Semantics? ★ multiple values? 4. … Incremental Consistency Guarantees 3 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  12. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION ABSTRACTION 
 FOR REPLICATED OBJECTS Consistency Consistency Strong 
 Consistency ???? 
 Weak 
 … … 20 22 17 Incremental Consistency Guarantees 4 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  13. SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION ABSTRACTION 
 FOR REPLICATED OBJECTS Consistency Consistency Strong 
 Consistency ???? 
 Weak 
 … … CORRECTABLE 20 22 17 Incremental Consistency Guarantees 4 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  14. Incremental 
 SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION Consistency 
 Guarantees (ICG) ABSTRACTION 
 FOR REPLICATED OBJECTS provides Consistency Consistency Strong 
 Consistency ???? 
 Weak 
 … … CORRECTABLE 20 22 17 Incremental Consistency Guarantees 4 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  15. Correctables / Design ➤ Starting point: Promises ➤ Placeholders for values ➤ Becoming mainstream value resolve 
 asynchronously PROMISE Incremental Consistency Guarantees 5 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  16. Correctables / Design ➤ Starting point: Promises ➤ Placeholders for values ➤ Becoming mainstream value 1 value 2 value resolve 
 asynchronously value n CORRECTABLE PROMISE Incremental Consistency Guarantees 5 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  17. Correctables / Design ➤ Starting point: Promises ➤ Placeholders for values ➤ Becoming mainstream PROGRESSIVELY 
 value 1 STRONGER CONSISTENCY (INCREMENTAL) value 2 value resolve 
 PROGRESSIVELY asynchronously value n HIGHER LATENCY CORRECTABLE PROMISE Incremental Consistency Guarantees 5 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  18. Consistency Models are Complementary Strong (Ideal protocol) L A T Consistency N Linearizable E Weak consistency: Strong consistency: M E R C Strong 
 N I Sequential Consistency ★ Fast ★ Slower Causal ★ (Often correct) ★ (Correct with certainty) (Worst protocol) Weak 
 Eventual Consistency Weak Low High Performance Incremental Consistency Guarantees 6 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  19. Consistency Models are Complementary Strong (Ideal protocol) L A T Consistency N Linearizable E Weak consistency: Strong consistency: M E R C Strong 
 N I Sequential Consistency ★ Fast ★ Slower Causal ★ (Often correct) ★ (Correct with certainty) (Worst protocol) Weak 
 Eventual Consistency Weak Low High Performance So what? Incremental Consistency Guarantees 6 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  20. Consistency Models are Complementary Strong (Ideal protocol) L A T Consistency N Linearizable E Weak consistency: Strong consistency: M E R C Strong 
 N I Sequential Consistency ★ Fast ★ Slower Causal ★ (Often correct) ★ (Correct with certainty) (Worst protocol) Weak 
 Eventual Consistency Weak Low High Performance So what? Latency optimizations Incremental Consistency Guarantees 6 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  21. Speculating with Correctables SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION read 
 timeline CORRECTABLE Lower latency of strong consistency Incremental Consistency Guarantees 7 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  22. Speculating with Correctables SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION value 1 value 2 read 
 Latency gap: ~100 ms Consistency Consistency Strong 
 Weak 
 timeline CORRECTABLE Lower latency of strong consistency Incremental Consistency Guarantees 7 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  23. Speculating with Correctables SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION Speculative 
 value 1 value 2 execution read 
 Latency gap: ~100 ms Consistency Consistency Strong 
 Weak 
 timeline • value 1 is often correct 
 Verify based on [Existential Consistency. SOSP’15] 
 value 2 [PBS. VLDB 5(8)’12] • Speculatively execute any further steps 
 e.g., prefetch dependent data CORRECTABLE Lower latency of strong consistency Incremental Consistency Guarantees 7 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  24. Speculating with Correctables SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATION Speculative 
 value 1 value 2 execution read 
 Latency gap: ~100 ms Consistency Consistency Strong 
 Weak 
 timeline • value 1 is often correct 
 Verify based on [Existential Consistency. SOSP’15] 
 value 2 [PBS. VLDB 5(8)’12] • Speculatively execute any further steps 
 e.g., prefetch dependent data CORRECTABLE Lower latency of strong consistency Incremental Consistency Guarantees 7 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  25. Traditional operation: Strongly-consistent timeline 200 ms Fetch timeline items 300ms 100 ms Incremental Consistency Guarantees 8 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  26. Traditional operation: Strongly-consistent timeline 200 ms Fetch timeline items 300ms 100 ms Speculative operation with ICG: value 1 value 2 100 ms 100 ms Fetch timeline items 100 ms Incremental Consistency Guarantees 8 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  27. Traditional operation: Strongly-consistent timeline 200 ms Fetch timeline items 300ms 100 ms Speculative operation with ICG: value 1 
 yes 200ms matches 
 value 1 value 2 value 2 100 ms 100 ms Fetch timeline items 100 ms Incremental Consistency Guarantees 8 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  28. Traditional operation: Strongly-consistent timeline 200 ms Fetch timeline items 300ms 100 ms Speculative operation with ICG: value 1 
 yes 200ms matches 
 value 1 value 2 value 2 100 ms 100 ms no Fetch timeline items Re-fetch 100 ms 300ms 100 ms Incremental Consistency Guarantees 8 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

  29. Speculation case-study ➤ Application: Twissandra ➤ Workload generated via YCSB ➤ Clients in Ireland ➤ Geo-replication on Amazon’s EC2 G R O G R V L A C Incremental Consistency Guarantees 9 Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend