SLIDE 7 What are some reasons for the adoption and continued use of hybrid plans?
- Indiana (implemented 1955) : [With the DB and Annuity Savings Account] “both
the employer and member have funds at risk [… ] it has been part of the Indiana system for a generation.”
- Nebraska (implemented 2002) : From 2000 Benefit Review Study, “Risk averse
employees would benefit from the defined benefit form, while investment savvy employees can choose the defined contribution plan.” From 2014 NPERS newsletter, “Barron’s noted that one of the things that helps keep Nebraska’s pension liability low is that it has a cash balance plan.”
- Tennessee (implemented 2013): “Reasons for Change…provide a sustainable
pension plan going forward; Control employer pension cost; Control unfunded liabilities related to pensions; Provide a sufficient level of benefits for career employees to maintain a reasonable standard of living at retirement”.
Links to sources:
- “Understanding Indiana’s Largest Pension System” (2014): http://www.in.gov/inprs/files/WhitePaper-UnderstandingINPRS.pdf
- “Benefit Review Study of the Nebraska Retirement Systems” (2000): http://npers.ne.gov/SelfService/public/howto/publications/Buck2000.pdf
- “Retirement News” NPERS (January 2014): http://npers.ne.gov/SelfService/public/newsletter/newsletterDC2014Jan.pdf
- “Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System New Hybrid Pension Plan with Cost Controls”
http://treasury.tn.gov/tcrs/PDFs/NewHybridPresentation.pdf