in lymphoma Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

in lymphoma
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

in lymphoma Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aims How immune checkpoint inhibitors work Success of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma

Catherine Hildyard Haematology Senior Registrar Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Aims

  • How immune checkpoint inhibitors work
  • Success of immune checkpoint inhibitors in

Hodgkin lymphoma

  • Toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint

inhibitors

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-Hodgkin

lymphoma?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

How immune checkpoint inhibitors work

Priming phase: CTLA-4 and PD-1 Effector phase: PD-1 Hude et al. (2017) Haematologica

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Pre-determined genetic susceptibility of cHL to PD-1 blockade?

Roemer et al. (2016) J Clin Oncol PD-L1 PD-L2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Unmet clinical need

  • Median survival of r/r cHL after failure of ASCT

= 2 years1

  • Brentuximab has a 75% response rate after

failure of ASCT but with progression free survival of only 5.6 months2

  • Response rate of brentuximab in transplant

ineligible patients is much lower at 30%3

1. Von Tresckow et al. (2014) Leuk Lymphoma 2. Younes et al. (2012) J Clin Oncol 3. Forero-Torres et al. (2012) Oncologist

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nivolumab in Hodgkin: Checkmate 039

  • Phase 1 study (Checkmate-039)
  • 23 patients
  • Relapsed / refractory cHL
  • Most had had ASCT and

brentuximab

  • 87% had 3 or more lines of Rx

Ansell et al. (2014) NEJM

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nivolumab in Hodgkin: Checkmate 039

  • Every patient had some tumour reduction
  • 87%: partial response + complete response
  • Only 17% (4 pts) had complete response

Ansell et al. (2014) NEJM

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Nivolumab in Hodgkin: Checkmate 205

Cohort B n = 80 Cohort A n = 63 Cohort C n = 100

Brentuximab vedotin naïve Brentuximab vedotin before and/or after auto-HSCT Brentuximab vedotin after auto-HSCT Relapsed cHL after autologous (auto)-HSCT nivolumab monotherapy

Primary endpoint

  • ORR

Additional endpoints

  • DOR
  • Duration of CR/PR
  • PFS by IRC
  • OS
  • Safety

Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W Treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Patients could elect to discontinue nivolumab and proceed to allogeneic SCT

23 months f/up 16 months f/up 19 months f/up

Armand et al. (2018) J Clin Oncol

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Best Overall Response by cohort

BV naïve (Cohort A) n=63 BV after auto- HSCT (Cohort B) n=80 BV before and/or after auto-HSCT (Cohort C) n=100 Overall n=243 Objective response, % 65 68 73 69 Best overall response, % Complete remission Partial remission Stable disease Progressive disease Unable to determine 29 37 24 11 13 55 21 8 4 12 61 15 10 2 16 53 19 9 2

  • >95% of patients had reduction in tumour burden
  • Responses were similar irrespective of BV treatment sequence
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Duration of Response by Best Overall Response

0.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 3 6 9 12 15 18 Proportion of patients in response DOR (months) 0.2 0.1 CR: Median: 20 months PR: Median: 13 months

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Outcomes After Allo-SCT (n=44)

Progression-free survival

Probability of PFS from subsequent allo-HSCT PFS from allo-SCT (days) 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

1.0

0.2 0.1 50 100 150 200

100-day rate 87% 6-month rate 82%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Toxicity post allo-SCT

  • But, 5% (2 pts) hyper-acute GVHD
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Similar trials with pembrolizumab: Keynote-087 study

Cohort 2 n = 81 Cohort 1 n = 69 BV treated post-ASCT SCT-naïve Failed salvage chemo & BV Cohort 3 n = 60 BV naïve post- ASCT

Chen et al. (2017) J Clin Oncol

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Similar trials with pembrolizumab: Keynote-087 study

Cohort 2 n = 81 Cohort 1 n = 69 BV treated post-ASCT SCT-naïve Failed salvage chemo & BV Cohort 3 n = 60 BV naïve post- ASCT

Chen et al. (2017) J Clin Oncol

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Similar trials with pembrolizumab: Keynote-087 study

Cohort 2 n = 81 Cohort 1 n = 69 BV treated post-ASCT SCT-naïve Failed salvage chemo & BV Cohort 3 n = 60 BV naïve post- ASCT

Chen et al. (2017) J Clin Oncol

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Patients with a drug-related AEs (≥10%), serious AEs (≥1%), or AEs leading to discontinuation (≥1%) Overall population (N = 243) Any grade Grade 3–4

Drug-related AE, % Fatigue 23 1 Diarrhea 15 1 Infusion-related reaction 14 Rash 12 1 Nausea 10 Pruritus 10 Drug-related serious AE, % Infusion-related reactions 2 <1 Pneumonitis 1 Drug-related AEs leading to discontinuation, % Pneumonitis 2 Autoimmune hepatitis 1 1

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Case study

  • 35 year old man
  • cHL diagnosed 2y ago, stage IIIA
  • 6xABVD – PR
  • 3 months later – progressive disease
  • 2xIVE – very good PR
  • 1xIVE and ASCT
  • 8 months later – progressed
  • BV 3 courses: PR
  • BV further 2 courses: PD prior to allo-SCT
  • Commenced pembrolizumab on trial
slide-18
SLIDE 18

PD-1 inhibitors are not without significant toxicity

Shortly after 3rd infusion:

  • Admitted with urinary retention
  • Ascending paraesthesia
  • Developed paraplegia and tingling

in both arms

  • Intractable hiccoughs
  • MRI performed

Rx commenced: high dose steroids, IVIG and plasma exchange

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Phase 1 data for PD-1 inhibitors in NHL

  • Phase 1 trial of nivolumab
  • r/r B cell and T cell NHL

Lesokhin et al. (2016) J Clin Oncol

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Preliminary phase 2 data for PD-1 inhibitors in DLBCL: checkmate 0139

  • Nivolumab in DLBCL relapsed post auto-SCT or

ineligible for auto-SCT

  • 161 patients

ASCT failed/ ineligible ORR (%) ASCT failed (n= 87) 10.3 ASCT ineligible (n=34) 2.9 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02038933

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Why are PD-1 inhibitors less effective in DLBCL than cHL?

Green et al. (2010) Blood

PMBCL

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PMBCL – a promising subtype?

  • Pembrolizumab for up to 2 years or until disease

progression/unacceptable toxicity

  • 81% patients had decrease in target lesions
  • OR 41%, CR 12%
  • DOR 2.3 to 22.5 months

Zinzani et al. (2017) Blood

slide-23
SLIDE 23

PCNSL and PTL

Nayak et al. (2017) Blood

  • Copy number gain and PD-L1/2 over-expression in PCNSL and PTL
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)+ NHL

  • Increased PD-L1 expression in EBV+ NHL:

– PTLD: 60% – Plasmablastic lymphoma: 44% – Primary effusion lymphoma: 50% – Extra-nodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: 67%

slide-25
SLIDE 25

NK/T-cell lymphoma and PD-1 inhibition

  • 7 patients with r/r NKTCL treated with

pembrolizumab

  • All patients responded: 5 CR, 2 PR
  • 5 patients remained in remission after a

median f/u of 6 months

  • Radiological CR correlated with clearance of

EBV DNA

  • “Pseudo-progression” seen in some patients

Kwong et al. (2017) Blood

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Enhancing efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors with combination therapy?

  • BV-treated tumour cells may undergo

“immunogenic cell death”1

  • Similar responses can also be induced by

chemotherapy and radiotherapy

  • Checkmate 436 study2: nivolumab +

brentuximab in r/r DLBCL and PTCL

1. Gardai et al. (2015) Cancer Res (abstract) 2. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581631

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Checkmate 436 case study

  • 67 year old woman with PTCL: no response to

4x CHOP-14

  • Escalated to IVEx2: CR, consolidated by

autograft

  • Relapse 14 months later: severe itch, fatigue,

cough, diarrhoea

  • Symptoms improved after 1 cycle of

checkmate 436

slide-28
SLIDE 28

PET scans pre and post checkmate 436

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Summary

  • PD-1 inhibitors are very effective in cHL:
  • Success both in relapse post-ASCT and in transplant

ineligible patients

  • Durable responses with CR and even with PR
  • Different toxicity profile from conventional chemotherapy
  • Some questions remain to be answered
  • PD-1 inhibitors have not yet found a niche in NHL:
  • Low activity in r/r DLBCL as monotherapy – ?role for

combination therapy

  • Some subtypes may be more responsive (PMBCL,

PCNSL/PTL, EBV+)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Thank you Questions?

catherine.hildyard@ouh.nhs.uk

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

PDL1 expression as a biomarker?

Younes et al. (2016) Lancet Oncol