Improving snow nowcasts for airports Elena Saltikoff, Finnish - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

improving snow nowcasts for airports
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Improving snow nowcasts for airports Elena Saltikoff, Finnish - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improving snow nowcasts for airports Elena Saltikoff, Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) Seppo Pulkkinen, FMI Annakaisa von Lerber, FMI Martin Hagen, German Aerospace Center (DLR) PNOWWA (Probabilistic Nowcasting of Winter Weather for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Elena Saltikoff, Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) Seppo Pulkkinen, FMI Annakaisa von Lerber, FMI Martin Hagen, German Aerospace Center (DLR) PNOWWA (Probabilistic Nowcasting

  • f Winter Weather for Airports)

Improving snow nowcasts for airports

slide-2
SLIDE 2

30.11.2017

2

Radar

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Winter weather

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Research Demos Probability distributions Terrain effects User needs

PNOWWA Project Goals

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

  • Snowfall. Intensity. Visibility.

e.g. Runway Throughput De-icing Capacity Balancing Paper 36 in this SID This Paper (nr 43 ) A poster in this SID

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nowcasting with extrapolation of radar images in PNOWWA

Common principle: Time= distance/speed

Example: storm 75 km away, moving 50 km/h arrives in 90 minutes

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

…..dry……..…… snow...maybe

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Task split in two

1. Calculate the motion vectors and their uncertainty 2. Move the radar image with the vectors, assess uncertainty

In PNOWWA we have tried three methods for both.

  • Simple one from 1990s (Andersson &

Ivarsson 1991)

  • Operational one from Finnish Met

Institute (Hohti et al 2000)

  • New ones in research (Proesmans et

al, Pulkkinen et al. )

  • (This picture related to the FMI

Operational one: ellipse is related to the uncertainty of motion vectors.)

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Simple Method: Andersson & Ivarsson 1991

Frequency distribution in source area as probability distrubution by time of arrival

PNOWWA

850 hPa wind vector

90-105 min forecast sector Uncertainty of movement direction estimated as constant +/-30 degrees

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The simple one was used in first demos, and it performed quite well !

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

EFHK Red: Observations (15 minutes) Green shades: 30-120 min forecasts

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Even in Innsbruck, which is a challenging place for radars

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

slide-10
SLIDE 10

”Radar is an excellent tool to say it is not raining”

Based on this image we can say that the precipitation does not start in EFJY in 2 hours. It is obvious for a meteorologist*. But it is valuable information for the snowplough driver.

*In Finland, in wintertime

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

EFJY

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why snow ? Why Airport ?

Extrapolation works only for already existing precipitation: you can not forecast summertime afternoon showers in the morning with these methods. Airport is a known point with limited number of professional users

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Radar better than NWP model up to 2h

Helsinki-Vantaa, 15 minutes steps:

Hitrate, winters 2015-2016. Colours: Radar-based extrapolation TAF NWP Model

12

30.11.2017

slide-13
SLIDE 13

New nowcasting method based on Stochastic Ensembles: STEPS

  • Motion field from consecutive radar images
  • Uncertainty of motion

assessed from a set of trajectories

  • Uncertainty due to growth and decay

modeled by a stochastic random field

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A radar image is decomposed to different scales

Large Medium Smallest Long-living features which move as they are Inbetween To be quickly replaced with random noise , smoothed out in output

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

slide-15
SLIDE 15

STEPS: Forecast Ensembles and Probabilities

+5 minutes +15 minutes +30 minutes Nowcast

  • 51 ensemble members are obtained by perturbing precipitation intensities and motion field.
  • The ensemble mean represents the “most probable” precipitation intensity.
  • The mean field becomes smoother when the forecast time increases: badly predictable

scales are filtered out.

  • The ensembles also yield probability distributions of precipitation intensities.

Members

Ensemble mean

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Comparing two cases in STEPS (the advanced method). Time step 5 minutes, 60 min range.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Two diagram types

Reliability diagrams

ROC – Relative Operating Characteristics

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

Perfect Forecasted probability Observed frequency Perfect POD FAR

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Reliability diagrams

Plots observed frequency against the forecast probability, where the range of forecast probabilities is divided into bins ( 0-5%, 5-15%, 15- 25%, etc.). The sample size in each bin is included as a histogram or values. Reliability is indicated by the proximity of the plotted curve to the diagonal.

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

Perfect Forecasted probability Observed frequency

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Reliability diagram 15 min

Laaja Kuurot

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Reliability diagram 30 min

Laaja Kuurot

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Reliability diagram 60 min

Laaja Kuurot

Small probabilities forecasted so seldomly, that this measure is not reliable In the isolated showers case, even 60 min forecast almost perfect ! In widepread case, when 40-80% was forecasted, almost 100% happened: underforecasting

slide-22
SLIDE 22

ROC – Relative Operating Characteristics

Plot hit rate or probability of detection against false alarms using set of increasing probabilities to make a yes-no decisions. Diagonal: no skill . Larger area above diagonal: Larger skill

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

Perfect FAR POD Over 5% prob = yes, snow ! Over 80% prob = yes, snow !

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ROC 15 min

slide-24
SLIDE 24

ROC 30 min

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

slide-25
SLIDE 25

ROC 60 min

Still very high Probability of Detection Still very low false alarm rate

slide-26
SLIDE 26

This was all radar-to-radar

Radar reflectivity is a measure of sum of diameters of particles in power of six. So, it is related to

  • Number of snowflakes in

volume

  • Size of snowflakes in volume
  • Other microphysical properties

(dielectricity) of the snowflakes Visibility and snow depth are also related to these parameters. But the relationship is not straightforward. For dBZ, one 2 mm snowflake contributes as much as 64 snow flakes of 1 mm – for visibility not.

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

slide-27
SLIDE 27

A lot of variability

From dBZ to visibility Snow ratio: from mm to cm

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Scandinavian ”mountains”

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Mountains

It’s complicated. Results from hills in Scandinavia do not apply to real mountains of the Alps. Motion vectors from radar data or the upper level wind do not explain why fronts sometimes stop. Future: analysis of motion vector uncertainty to assess cyclogenesis

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Forecasting with thresholds

PNOWWA General presentation - Saltikoff

Probability for

  • ver 5 mm

Probability for 1-5 mm How many millimeters

  • Final

selection

  • If not, then more
  • r less?
  • Not accurate

anyways

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Potential for follow-up projects

as identified in PNOWWA Surveys

Data Fusion

Numerical Weather Prediction Models (EPS) Special models (road, fog, DRSN, …) Annex III standard products (TAF, METAR, …)

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

PNOWWA is S2020 Fundamental Explonatory Research. To reach higher maturity levels, more work is needed

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Snow at airport

Aviation users are not afraid

  • f probabilities

Radar is a useful tool for nowcasting

  • Timing in steps of 15 minutes
  • Lead times up to 2-3 hours

It is also important to forecast that it will not snow

PNOWWA General Presentation - Saltikoff

slide-33
SLIDE 33

This project has received funding from the SESAR Joint Undertaking under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 699221

The opinions expressed herein reflect the author’s view only. Under no circumstances shall the SESAR Joint Undertaking be responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.

Thank you very much for your attention!

PNOWWA Probabilistic Nowcasting of Winter Weather for Airports