Improving Physical Activity Opportunities in Elementary School - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

improving physical activity opportunities in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Improving Physical Activity Opportunities in Elementary School - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Improving Physical Activity Opportunities in Elementary School Settings: Results of Power Up for 30, A Statewide Elementary School Physical Activity Initiative in Georgia Chair: Emily Anne Vall, PhD, Georgia Department of Public Health


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Improving Physical Activity Opportunities in Elementary School Settings: Results of Power Up for 30, A Statewide Elementary School Physical Activity Initiative in Georgia

Chair: Emily Anne Vall, PhD, Georgia Department of Public Health Panelists: Christi Kay, MEd HealthMPowers, Inc. Patricia Cheung, MPH Emory University Erica Hamilton, Emory University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Few children meet physical activity recommendations

25% met

guidelines2

60 minutes of

MVPA per day1

19% no activity2

1http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_young_people/en/ 2Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State Indicator Report on Physical Activity, 2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of

Health and Human Services, 2014

3Belcher BR, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Emken BA, Chou C-P, Spruijt-Metz D. Physical activity in US youth: effect of race/ethnicity, age,

gender, and weight status. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(12):2211-2221. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e1fba9.

Disparities

gender, age, race/ethnicity,

  • besity, geography2,3
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Schools are an ideal place to intervene and increase physical activity

55 million

students enrolled1

>50% of the recommended 60

MVPA minutes in school2 Opportunity for

equity

1https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=65 2Institute of Medicine, Press TNA. Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School.

Washington, DC; 2013.

Half of waking

hours in school2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What is Georgia Shape

Addressing Childhood Obesity

Government Philanthropy Academia Business

A statewide, multi-agency, multi-dimensional initiative of Governor Nathan Deal

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Initial Policy

Aerobic Capacity Flexibility Muscular Strength Muscular Endurance

BMI

(Body Mass Index)

Health Related Fitness Components

S.H.A.P.E Act : State-wide annual fitness assessment for students in grades 1- 12 taught by certified physical education teachers Launched 2011-2012 school year

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Initial Results/Findings

43% of Georgia children are overweight or obese 20% of Georgia children were not in the Healthy Fitness Zone for ANY of the Fitnessgram assessments 16% of Georgia children were in the HealthyFitness Zone for all Fitnessgram assessments

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Call to Action – Power Up for 30

Funded in part by The Coca-Cola Foundation

30 minutes Every Day Every School Every Child

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Power Up for 30 Collaboration and Implementation Strategies

Panelist: Christi Kay, MEd President HealthMPowers, Inc. Christi.Kay@healthmpowers.org

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HealthMPowers

Founding Sponsors  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta  Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University Mission: To empower healthy habits and transform environments where children live, learn and play What We Do: Multi year comprehensive nutrition and physical activity programming Who We Serve: Child care centers, elementary, middle and high schools, out

  • f school time providers and communities
slide-10
SLIDE 10

60 Minute s

Staff Engagement Physical Activity During School Physical Education Before/After School Physical Activity Family and Community Engagement

Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pilot - 2013

  • 39 Schools (5 districts)
  • Key Partners

– Departments of Public Health and Education – Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia Foundation (funder) – HealthMPowers, Inc. (non-profit - training) – Georgia State University (evaluator)

  • Three Trainings
  • Data Collection
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Program Components Program Outcomes Student Outcomes

Establish School Health Team Obtain Baseline Data Implement Trainings Provide Resources Increased MVPA in PE Improved Aerobic Capacity Improved Weight Status (BMI Percentile) Increased PA in Classroom Increased PA Before School Improved School Environment for PA

Pilot Intervention Model

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Power Up for 30 Process

Assess Progress Implement Plan Create a Plan Attend Training Complete Assessment Establish Team Sign up

Admin, PE, Classroom Power up for 30 Survey Data Mining Best Practices PA Resources 30 Minutes! Follow Up Survey Sign Pledge

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Training

  • Facilitators and Barriers to PA in School
  • Research
  • Data Mining – Self Assessment Results
  • Best Practices, Strategies and Resources

– Classroom PA – Recess – Before and After School

  • Integration – Time
  • Commitment Planning
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Data Mining – Activity

Power Up for 30 Survey Results

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Data Mining Processing and Planning

15 15 10 5 15 10 20 30 15 15 10 5 10 5 30 30

Use your school’s Power Up for 30 Data Mining to explore the areas of before, during, and/or after school. Let’s see where physical activity can be added to your school day.

BOKS HMP Mind in Motion JAMin’ Minute Example: 30 minutes, every day, every child

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Power Up for 30 Plan Before/After School Program

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Resources

  • Online Trainings
  • Physical Activity Resource Guide
  • Handouts
  • School PA self-assessment
  • Power Up for 30 Plan templates
  • Making the Pitch Slides and Notes
  • Success Stories
  • Incentives
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Power Up for 30 School Engagement 881 Schools Reached 1898 Staff Trained 467,626 Students Impacted

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Power Up for 30: a Quasi-experimental Study Evaluating the Impact of an Elementary School-Based Intervention on Physical Activity Opportunities in Georgia

Patricia Cheung, MPH Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University Email: pccheun@emory.edu

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Impact of school-based physical activity interventions on physical activity

1Dobbins M, Husson H, DeCorby K, LaRocca RL. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in

children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD007651. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub2.

2Russ LB, Webster CA, Beets MW, Phillips and DS. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multi-component Interventions Through

Schools to Increase Physical Activity. J Phys Act Health. 2015.

3Kriemler S, Meyer U, Martin E, van Sluijs EMF, Andersen LB, Martin BW. Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and

fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):923-930. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2011-090186.

Generally thought to be

effective 1, 2, 3

Interventions have

small impact2 Multi-component

interventions increase effect sizes2, 3 Effective components:2

During school Before and after school Staff wellness

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Types of multi-component physical activity interventions

1Brusseau TA, Hannon J, Burns R. Effect of a Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program on Physical Activity and Health-Related

Fitness in Children from Low-Income Families. J Phys Act Health. 2016;(May):888-894. doi:10.1123/jpah.2016-0028.

2Carson RL, Castelli DM, Pulling Kuhn AC, et al. Impact of trained champions of comprehensive school physical activity programs on

school physical activity offerings, youth physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Prev Med (Baltim). 2014;69:S12-S19. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.025.

Specified Intervention1

  • Hired physical activity leader
  • Monthly in-service
  • pportunities for teachers
  • PE curriculum changes
  • Structured/semi-structured

recess

  • Frequent activity breaks

Adaptable Intervention2

  • 6-hour workshop for PE

teachers

  • Action plan development
  • Resources
  • Support
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Goal and Hypothesis

Power Up for 30 aims to increase physical activity (PA)

  • pportunities (e.g. during physical education (PE), during recess,

in class, before school, and after school) offered to elementary school students By one year after PU30 training, PU30-trained schools will have more PA opportunity time than untrained schools, even after adjusting for demographics, school characteristics, and baseline physical activity

slide-24
SLIDE 24

419 elementary schools with no training from 2/2014-9/2014

Study Design

All 1,333 Georgia elementary schools received PA School Survey in 2013-2014 (baseline) 719 elementary schools with response from admin, PE teacher, and at least 3 grade level chairs PU30 Arm: 79 randomly selected 0 declined to participate 79 included in study and received follow-up survey Comparison Arm: 80 randomly selected 0 declined to participate 80 included in study and received follow-up survey 614 elementary schools excluded 300 elementary schools with training from 2/2014-9/2014

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Study Measures and Data Sources

Measures Data Sources School- level Outcomes Frequency (occurrences/week) and duration (minutes/occurrence) of:  PE  Recess  Classroom PA breaks  Before-school PA  After-school PA Statewide School Physical Activity Survey Measures Data Sources School- level Outcomes Frequency (occurrences/week) and duration (minutes/occurrence) of:  PE  Recess  Classroom PA breaks  Before-school PA  After-school PA Physical Activity School Setting Survey School- level Covariates Student Demographics  Race/ethnicity  Free/reduced lunch rate School Characteristics  School size  Geographical setting Department of Education

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Baseline demographics and school characteristics differed by training status

Characteristic Untrained (n=62) Trained (n=71) Standardized Difference N or Mean % or SD N or Mean % or SD Socioeconomic Status Low (>75% FRL) 22 35.5 36 50.7 0.31 Mid-low (50%<FRL≤75%) 18 29.0 11 15.5

  • 0.33

Mid-high (25%<FRL≤50%) 13 21.0 12 16.9

  • 0.10

High (≤25% FRL) 9 14.5 12 16.9 0.07 Mean (SD) percent White 50.8 27.8 39.0 27.0

  • 0.43

Mean (SD) percent Hispanic 11.2 11.7 19.8 18.4 0.56 School Size Large (>735 students) 17 27.4 28 39.4 0.24 Medium (550-735 students) 22 35.5 22 31.4

  • 0.12

Small (<550 students) 23 37.1 21 30.0

  • 0.12

School Geographical Location City 9 14.5 9 12.7

  • 0.05

Suburban 21 33.9 46 64.8 0.65 Town 8 12.9 7 9.9

  • 0.10

Rural 24 38.7 9 12.7

  • 0.62
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Baseline physical activity opportunities differed by training status

Baseline Follow-Up Untrained (n=62) Trained (n=71) Untrained (n=62) Trained (n=71) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD PE 100.9 6.1 104.3 5.0 105.5 5.5 104.9 4.3 Recess 100.4 3.9 89.8 4.2 96.2 3.7 98.8 3.6 In-class PA 30.4 2.3 40.5 2.6 36.1 2.6 52.0 2.5 Before-school PA Not Assessed at Baseline 3.6 1.3 14.1 3.2 After-school PA Not Assessed at Baseline 22.6 5.9 31.4 5.2 SD= standard deviation; PE= physical education; PA=physical activity

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Trained schools provided moderately more physical activity opportunity time than untrained schools

Model 1 Mean Diff 99% UI Total PA time 41.8 37.8 45.8 PE time

  • 0.7 -3.2

2.0 At lower baseline PE time

  • At higher baseline PE time
  • Recess time

2.6 0.4 5.0 In class PA time 15.8 15.3 16.3 Before school PA time 10.5 10.0 11.0 After school PA time 8.8 8.3 9.3 UI= Uncertainty Interval PA=physical activity PE=physical education Model 1 Model 2 Mean Diff 99% UI Mean Diff 99% UI Total PA time 41.8 37.8 45.8 36.4 31.7 41.0 PE time

  • 0.7 -3.2

2.0

  • At lower baseline PE time
  • 1.8
  • 4.5

1.0 At higher baseline PE time

  • 4.8
  • 8.4
  • 1.4

Recess time 2.6 0.4 5.0 6.7 4.0 9.7 In class PA time 15.8 15.3 16.3 12.0 11.4 12.6 Before school PA time 10.5 10.0 11.0 9.4 8.9 9.8 After school PA time 8.8 8.3 9.3 3.1 2.6 3.6 UI= Uncertainty Interval PA=physical activity PE=physical education Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Mean Diff 99% UI Mean Diff 99% UI Mean Diff 99% UI Total PA time 41.8 37.8 45.8 36.4 31.7 41.0 34.7 29.7 39.3 PE time

  • 0.7 -3.2

2.0

  • At lower baseline PE time
  • 1.8
  • 4.5

1.0

  • 6.7
  • 9.5 -4.1

At higher baseline PE time

  • 4.8
  • 8.4
  • 1.4
  • 8.7 -12.2 -5.5

Recess time 2.6 0.4 5.0 6.7 4.0 9.7 8.4 5.1 11.4 In class PA time 15.8 15.3 16.3 12.0 11.4 12.6 11.9 11.2 12.5 Before school PA time 10.5 10.0 11.0 9.4 8.9 9.8 7.5 7.2 7.9 After school PA time 8.8 8.3 9.3 3.1 2.6 3.6 1.0 0.5 1.5 UI= Uncertainty Interval PA=physical activity PE=physical education

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Strengths and Limitations

Limitations Observational design, potential residual confounding Self-reported survey data Approximately one-year follow-up Limitations Strengths Observational design, potential residual confounding Adjusted for demographic and

  • ther school characteristics

Self-reported survey data Informed implementation strategy Approximately one-year follow-up Identified school level-changes resulting from CSPAP-based intervention

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conclusions and Next Steps

  • PU30 training modestly increased physical activity
  • pportunities, particularly during recess, in class, and

before school

  • Effects of PU30 on physical activity opportunities were

attenuated by school-level demographics, other characteristics and baseline PA

  • Individual level data needed to assess the impact of

physical activity opportunity changes on student physical activity levels

slide-31
SLIDE 31

THANK YOU!

CONTACT: PCCHEUN@EMORY.EDU

QUESTIONS?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The Exploration of the Barriers & Facilitators of Power Up for 30: A Qualitative Evaluation

Erica Hamilton, MPH Candidate Emory University Department of Behavioral Sciences & Health Education Email: erica.hamilton@emory.edu

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Goal and Objectives

▪ Goal: ▪ To assess the barriers and facilitators of uptake and implementation of the Power Up for 30 initiative in the Georgia elementary school system by conducting individual, in-depth qualitative interviews with elementary school administrators, PE teachers and grade level chairs. ▪ Objectives:

  • 1. To understand the decisional processing of participation in the

Power Up for 30 initiative.

  • 2. To assess barriers to uptake and implementation of the Power Up for

30 initiative.

  • 3. To assess the facilitators to uptake and implementation of the Power

Up for 30 initiative.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Barriers to implementation in school-setting

▪ Time ▪ Competing academic priorities ▪ Classroom management ▪ Poor student behavior ▪ Lack of buy-in from teachers & students ▪ Teacher frustration ▪ Limited school personnel ▪ Limited Space & Money ▪ Cost of the program ▪ Limited space in classroom ▪ Lack of equipment

Pommier, Guevel, & Jourdan, 2010; Stewart-Brown, 2006; World Health Organization, 2000; Skar, Kirstein and Kapur , 2007; Hall et al., 2014

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Facilitators to implementation in school-setting

▪ Teacher & student engagement & buy-in ▪ Administrative support ▪ Adequate equipment & space ▪ Students physically engaging in health program ▪ Setting time slots for healthy activities ▪ Clean physical environment ▪ Communication with key stakeholders

Hall et al., 2014; Skar, Kirstein, & Kapur, 2007, 2015; Mwanga, Jensen, Magnussen & Aagaard-Hansen, 2007; Pommier, Guevel, & Jourdan, 2010; Rootman, Goodstadt, Potvin & Springett, 2001; WHO, 1998

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Data Collection

▪ 19 interviews at 7 elementary schools ▪ 5 PU30 trained schools, 2 untrained schools ▪ 7 administrators, 6 PE teachers, 6 grade level chairs ▪ 3 counties in metro-Atlanta

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Elementary School District Demographics

District 1 District 2 District 3 Total students 50,360 43,173 8,961 Gender 51% Males 49% Females 51% Males 49% Females 52% Males 48% Females Race 40% White 30% Black 21% Hispanic 5% Asian 4% American Indian

  • r Multiracial

42% Black 30% White 16% Hispanic 10% Asian 2% American Indian

  • r Multiracial

49% Black 38% White 8% Hispanic 4% Multiracial 1% Asian or American Indian Interviews conducted 10 (4 schools) 3 (1 school) 6 (2 schools)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Interview Guides

▪ 2 semi-structured interview guides: ▪ 1 for trained and 1 for untrained schools

▪ ~20 questions on trained guide ▪ ~10 questions on untrained guide

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Example Interview Questions

▪ Interview Topics & Questions: ▪ Broad physical activity questions

▪ “Can you tell me about the physical activity that your students get at school?” ▪ “Have you noticed any changes to recess time and quality?”

▪ Barriers to each component of PA at school

▪ “Can you tell me about any barriers that you notice to recess?”

▪ Facilitators to each component of PA at school

▪ ”Can you tell me about any facilitators that you notice to recess?”

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Example Interview Questions

▪ General knowledge and opinions on the PU30 initiative, training and resources

  • Trained schools:
  • “Can you tell me what you know about the Power Up for 30 initiative?”
  • “Can you tell me about the Power Up for 30 resources that you use?"
  • “What was the most effective part of the training?”
  • Untrained schools:

▪ “Have you heard of the Power Up for 30 initiative?” ▪ “Can you tell me about other physical activity initiatives that your school participates in?”

▪ Follow up support and other needs/desires

  • “What else can be done to be done or provided to make increasing physical activity at

your school easier?”

  • “If your school were to take on a physical activity initiative, what would be the most

useful/helpful components?”

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Key Findings ▪Barriers

▪ Time ▪ Lack of communication between those who attend training and those who do not ▪ Disconnect between different positions at school (PE teacher, classroom teacher, administrators) ▪ Competing initiatives ▪ Confusion about the initiative

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Quotes about Barriers

Time Lack of communication Confusion about the initiative

“I guess there’s a lot of confusion leading up to it like, “What is this? What are we doing?” I know that day some people were like, “Well, I don’t know why we get to wear workout clothes but I’m wearing workout clothes ‘cuz—” so I think there was a lack of knowledge leading up to it. The day of, I would say some of our teachers really bought into it and some of them did absolutely nothing with it. ”(Administrator) “They (the teachers who attended the training) didn’t do a great job of

  • redelivering. Maybe that’s our fault. We never let them, like at a staff

meeting or something, talk about what they learned. ” (Administrator) “It’s just the issue of making sure you have the time in your day to do it (brain breaks). That really is the biggest difficulty. It’s not a challenge to do it. The kids enjoy it and that helps.” (Grade Level Chair)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Key Findings

▪ Facilitators

▪ Administrative support ▪ Buy-In from teachers ▪ PU30 resources/sharing resources ▪ PE teacher as facilitator ▪ Importance of students’ health & wellbeing

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Quotes about Facilitators

Administrative support, teacher buy-in & shared resources PE teacher facilitating brain breaks PU30 resources (GoNoodle)

“It’s the online program website that our teachers use that have different activities that they can click on. It’s anything from dance to even yoga stretching and they just click on an activity. Actually, our kids oftentimes pick their favorites cuz they’ve so used it. The screen facilitates the movement or the activity in front of them on the big screen. ” (Administrator) “The PE teacher frequently sends us (classroom teachers) different ideas for brain breaks. One year, she did a presentation and gave us a deck of cards and then gave us a whole exercise that you could do with cards. We have popsicle sticks with different sets of five activities on ‘em. She sends emails with ideas, at least monthly. ” (Grade level chair) “I think when you’ve got a staff that supports the initiative, it’s an infectious thing. I think the combination of the administrator and teachers who work very actively doing it has helped. It created shared resources like, we found this really cool link. Once you started creating a catalogue of variety of different things that made it a lot easier than having such a limited number of options for brain breaks. ” (Grade Level Chair)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Other Important Findings

▪ Desire for more follow-up support ▪ Desire for booster sessions ▪ Desire for school-wide trainings

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Limitations

▪ Difficulty with recruitment ▪ Smaller sample size ▪ Fewer untrained schools

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Conclusions

▪ Increased participation in training  Increased participation in initiative ▪ Post-training presentation/meeting at school  Increased participation in initiative ▪ Lack of knowledge  Lack of participation ▪ Communication is KEY! ▪ Support from key stakeholders is essential

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Next Steps

▪ Dig deeper into the data!

▪ Comparative analysis across positions at school & trained versus untrained schools

▪ Finish up Thesis & Final Report to send to participating schools, HealthMPowers & Department of Public Health

slide-49
SLIDE 49

THANK YOU!

ERICA HAMILTON ERICA.HAMILTON@EMORY.EDU

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Other Results

Pre-service Certification DOE Superintendent’s 2020 Vision

“Every elementary and middle school student will have access to at least 30 minutes of physical activity per day.”

Richard Woods State Superintendent

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Sustainability Efforts

  • Quantitative Results

– Middle School Expansion – Out of School Time Expansion

  • Qualitative Results

– Booster Sessions – Continued Communication

  • Monthly Newsletters
  • Updated On line Resources
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Thank You and Questions

Chair: Emily Anne Vall, PhD, Georgia Department of Public Health Panelists: Christi Kay, MEd HealthMPowers, Inc. Patricia Cheung, MPH Emory University Erica Hamilton, Emory University