improving mental health and
play

improving mental health and wellbeing Catherine Richardson Public - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welfare rights: a key driver to improving mental health and wellbeing Catherine Richardson Public Health What does Public Mental Health mean in County Durham? Adopted the Mental Illness and Mental Health: The Two Continua Model Across the


  1. Welfare rights: a key driver to improving mental health and wellbeing Catherine Richardson Public Health

  2. What does Public Mental Health mean in County Durham? • Adopted the Mental Illness and Mental Health: The Two Continua Model Across the Lifespan • This model moves past the concept that mental health is the absence of mental illness and believes that mental health can be enhanced regardless of a diagnosis of mental illness.

  3. The Mental Health/Illness Continuum

  4. Public Mental Health Strategy • Based on local needs • Evidence base • All age • Multi agency partnership • Endorsed by Joint Health & Wellbeing Board • Priority groups

  5. National context

  6. Number of suicides year on year in County Durham

  7. Mosaic- allocation of those taking own life to 7 ‘supergroups’ Mosaic Public Sector Supergroups Your area/file % Comp. % Pen. % Index A Rural and small town inhabitants 17 8.33 42,946 10.65 0.04 78 B Affluent households 3 1.47 23,094 5.73 0.01 26 C Middle income families 19 9.31 60,025 14.89 0.03 63 D Young people starting out 6 2.94 18,017 4.47 0.03 66 E Lower income residents 109 53.43 179,062 44.42 0.06 120 F Elderly occupants 17 8.33 38,263 9.49 0.04 88 G Social housing tenants 33 16.18 41,686 10.34 0.08 156 Total 204 100 403,093 100 0.05 100 Based on postcode; those taking their own life are more likely to be lower income residents and social housing tenants (index value >100)

  8. Mosaic- allocation by ‘group’ Mosaic Public Sector Groups Your area/file % Comp. % Pen. % Index A Residents of isolated rural communities 7 3.43 11,242 2.79 0.06 123 Residents of small and mid-sized towns with strong local B 10 4.90 31,704 7.87 0.03 62 roots Wealthy people living in the most sought after C 0 0.00 4,233 1.05 0.00 0 neighbourhoods Successful professionals living in suburban or semi-rural D 3 1.47 18,861 4.68 0.02 31 homes Middle income families living in moderate suburban E 10 4.90 38,812 9.63 0.03 51 semis Couples with young children in comfortable modern F 9 4.41 21,213 5.26 0.04 84 housing G Young, well-educated city dwellers 2 0.98 6,849 1.70 0.03 58 Couples and young singles in small modern starter H 4 1.96 11,168 2.77 0.04 71 homes Lower income workers in urban terraces in often diverse I 20 9.80 27,274 6.77 0.07 145 areas Owner occupiers in older-style housing in ex-industrial J 23 11.27 46,853 11.62 0.05 97 areas Residents with sufficient incomes in right-to-buy social K 66 32.35 104,935 26.03 0.06 124 housing Active elderly people living in pleasant retirement L 2 0.98 6,268 1.55 0.03 63 locations M Elderly people reliant on state support 15 7.35 31,995 7.94 0.05 93 N Young people renting flats in high density social housing 2 0.98 2,714 0.67 0.07 146 Families in low-rise social housing with high levels of O 31 15.20 38,972 9.67 0.08 157 benefit need Total 204 100 403,093 100 0.05 100

  9. Results; 2005-2012 data • 81% male; age distribution shown below Number of suicides Age

  10. Trends over time… Number of suicides Year

  11. Characteristics of those taking their own life • 62.8% were divorced, separated, single, or widowed • 32.2% lived alone • 30% were unemployed • The most common method was hanging/strangulation

  12. Characteristics of those taking their own life • 58.9% were recorded as having a mental health problem • 39.2% had a history of self-harm • 20% had significant alcohol intake recorded • 13% were drug users • 53% had a history of involvement with Criminal justice system (CJS)

  13. Contact with services • 44% had contact with their GP in the 3 months before death • 37.9% had contact with mental health services in the 12 months before their death, of these; • 82% unemployed • 37% lived alone • 68% single • 57% contact with CJS • 37% noted as having alcohol problem • 18% recorded as drug users

  14. Themes for those where multiple triggers thought to be relevant Theme Number of cases affected Mental health problems 33 Family/relationship 33 breakdown Ill health 12 Bereavement 29 Alcohol 15 Financial problems 29 Drug use 7 Problems at work 3 Police involvement 5

  15. So, overall, most common triggers are; Theme Number affected Percentage Mental Health 74 25.9% Diagnoses Family/relationship 73 25.6% breakdown Bereavement 47 16.5% Financial Problems 34 11.9%

  16. Is the economic crisis going to spell more suicides in County Durham?

  17. What is already available in County Durham ? • Welfare Rights service targeted at those with poor mental health • Bereavement • U Care Share deliver family practical support incl a home visit • Cruse deliver bereavement support • As part of counselling provision; bereavement counselling • Financial support is currently delivered through CAB • A county wide relationship support service is available through ‘Relate’. Couples counselling is offered through IAPT and some volunteer organisations also offer support. • Community support through CREE (sheds project)

  18. Prevention of Mental Ill-Health Reduce the suicide and self-harm rate Cree project – Locally based – The ‘Reason’ and Focus – Champions – Training – Referral/Ongoing Support – Welfare Rights support

  19. Cree project

  20. Thank you • Catherine.richardson@durham.gov.uk

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend