Improving eLearning through Statistical Feedback Bachelors Thesis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Improving eLearning through Statistical Feedback Bachelors Thesis - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Improving eLearning through Statistical Feedback Bachelors Thesis Final Talk Student: Beatris Burdeva Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Georg Carle Advisers: Marc-Oliver Pahl, Stefan Liebald Garching, 10. July 2017 Overview I. Motivation II.
I. Motivation II. Reasoning behind our Implementation Choices
- Analysis, Initial Ideas, Related Work
- III. Implemented Artifacts
- Input
- Processing
- Visualizations
- IV. Future Work
2
Overview
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- I. Motivation
3
- labsystem
- eLearning platform for content creation and course management
- ilab1 and ilab2
- How to improve the learning process of ilab participants by making use of
the statistical data that is being gathered?
- Additional features (feedback elements)?
- What data?
- What visualizations?
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- II. Reasoning behind our Implementation Choices
4 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- Analysis
Best practice: Explanation: Simplicity [1] easy to understand and use focus on the content, not organization Interactivity [1, 2] collaboration different perspectives social and cooperative skills Diversity [3] diverse strategies to communicate new contents and to assess learners' progress Authenicity [1] relevant problems learning-by-doing make mistakes and learn from them Adaptivity [2, 4] good practices from traditional education Privacy [5] respective and protective of personal data
Best practices for creating a good learning process Focus - on the learners
5
- What is a good learning process?
- Simplicity
- Interactivity
- Diversity
- Authenticity
- Adaptivity
- Privacy
- Basic set of feedback elements:
- forum
- chat
- multiple choice questions/quizzes
- free input fields/peer assessments
- (analytical) visualizations
- Implementation features:
- graphical representation of
the answers (e.g. with boxes)
- coloring of the answers
- ...
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- II. Reasoning behind our Implementation Choices
- Analysis (Related Work)
labsystem, Coursera, edX, Moodle
- II. Reasoning behind our Implementation Choices
6 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- Analysis -Related Work
Best practice: Features, contributing to fulfilling the practice:
labsystem
Coursera edX Moodle Simplicity [1]
Link each element (e.g. question) to an email body
Option to sort posts by e.g. votes Separation of posts in categories Restrict chat to a certain group of users
Interactivity [1, 2]
Comments section, visible only to tutors
Option to follow posts Option to upload files Time left until finish-deadline shown
Diversity [3]
Red/green coloring of answers
Option for learners to specify if they want to receive emails from
- rganizations
that represent the course Check/X marks for the right/wrong answers Option to choose certainty level
Authenicity [1]
More than one attempt possible to answer a question
Explanation to the given answers (why correct/ incorrect) More than one attempt possible to answer a question Graphical representation of number of registrations per country
Adaptivity [2, 4]
Blended learning
Blended learning Blended learning Blended learning
Privacy [5]
Visibility rights
Privacy policy Privacy policy Privacy policy
Main Findings:
- Missing basic feedback elements in the labsystem:
- Chat and forum
- However: ticket system, email system
- Visualizations by the other three platforms:
- Coursera and edX
- OS, browser, cookies, etc.
- No information of how exactly they process and visualize this data.
- Moodle – users per site, registrations per country, etc.
- Conclusion.
- More suitable for large scale courses.
- No information found about visualizations relevant for us.
- Stay with our initial ideas.
7 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Intermediate talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- Related Work
- II. Reasoning behind our Implementation Choices
- II. Reasoning behind our Implementation Choices
8 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- Initial Ideas
Artifact Contributes to: Audience
- 1. Time Analysis
Simplicity, Interactivity, Diversity
- recognition of time
related issues
- overview of the
course workload Tutors and advisers (learners - indirect)
- 2. Time Left
Simplicity, Interactivity, Diversity
- increase self-refection
- assess performance
- better time planning
Learners
- 3. Worst Answered
Multiple Choice (MC) and Input Questions Simplicity, Diversity
- recognition of tasks
with worst achieved results
- adaptation of
contents
- emphasis on
misunderstood contents Tutors and advisers (learners - indirect)
- 4. Additional MC
Statistics (“clicks” per anwer) Simplicity, Diversity Tutors and advisers (learners - indirect)
- 5. Emotional Feedback -
like/dislike buttons Simplicity, Diversity, Authenticity
- improve the emotional
engagement of the learners
- point out preferred
contents Tutors, advisers, learners
Future work
- D. Dimova
Implemented
9 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- 1. Time Analysis
- 3. Worst Answered MC and Input Questions
- 4. Additional MC Statistics
- existing overview page (Figure 1) - results in average, not just per team
- comparison between terms
- II. Reasoning behind our Implementation Choices
Figure 1: “My statistics” overview page, demo
10
Learning elements in the labsystem -Analysis
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- page (p),
- multiple choice (m),
- input (i),
- collection (c/C),
- lab (l),
- schedule (s)
Logic: p,m,i -> c -> C -> prelab/lab -> virtual page
- 3. Worst Answered Multiple Choice (MC) Questions
11
- III. Implemented Artifacts
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- Visualization
- 3. Worst Answered Multiple Choice (MC) Questions
12
- III. Implemented Artifacts
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- Input
- Processing
13 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- III. Implemented Artifacts
- 3. Worst Answered Input Questions
- Visualization
14 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- III. Implemented Artifacts
- 3. Worst Answered Input Questions
- Input
- Processing
15 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- III. Implemented Artifacts
- Input
- Processing
- 4. Additional MC statistics - clicks per answer
16 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- gChartPHP [8] - PHP wrapper for the Google Chart API [10], published under the
Apache License [11]
- III. Implemented Artifacts
- 4. Additional MC statistics - clicks per answer
- Visualization
17 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- published under
GNU General Public License [12]
- III. Implemented Artifacts
- Visualization
- 1. Time Analysis
- gChartToolPHP
[9] - PHP wrapper for the Google Chart API [10],
18 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
Already existing: Time spent per credit Figure 2: Time spent per credit [7]
19 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- III. Implemented Artifacts
- 1. Time Analysis
- Input
- Processing
- IV. Future Work
20 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- Implementation of the features offered by Coursera, edX and Moodle (e.g.
forum)
- “Emotional feedback” - like/dislike buttons
- Time Left
- Adaptation/ complete new implementation of the existing time tracking
algorithm - advantageous
- Implementation of features, which make the time analysis easier and more
- precise. For example, buttons "pause", "revise" and "end"
[1] B.H. Khan, Managing eLearning Strategies: Design, Delivery, Implementation and
- Evaluation. Idea Group Inc., 2005.
[2] J. Hattie, Visible Learning. Routedge, 2009. [3] C.M. Reigeluth, Instructional design theories and models, Volume III. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1999. [4] M.V. Konstantina Chrysafiadi, “Student modeling approaches: A literature review for the last decade”, Expert Systems with Applications, 2013 [5] Official web page of the labsystem “http://labsystem.m-o-p.de/ [6] Coursera's official website - https://www.coursera.org/about/privacy [7] time tracking in the labsystem's official website: https://ilab.net.in.tum.de/timeTracking/?config=2016ws&address=l7&ttlab=7 [8] Documentation and code of the gChartPHP tool: https://github.com/pacbard/gChartPhp [9] Official web page of the gChartToolPHP wrapper tool: https://sourceforge.net/projects/gcharttoolphp/
References
21 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
[10] Official web page of Google Charts: https://developers.google.com/chart/ [11] Apache License: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 [12] GNU General Public License version 3.0 (GPLv3): https://sourceforge.net/directory/os:windows/license:gplv3/
References
22 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
Thank you!
Beatris Burdeva beatris.burdeva@tum.de
24 Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
- III. Related Work: Coursera, edX, Moodle
Main Findings:
- Missing basic feedback elements in the labsystem:
- Chat and forum
- A ticket system and emails for communicating problems instead
- Visualizations by the other three platforms:
- Coursera and edX – for internal use (More details in the following slides!)
- Moodle – users per site, registrations per country, etc.
- Conclusion.
- More suitable for large scale courses. Stay with our own initial ideas.
- Gathered Non-Personal Information:
- Visited pages of the site, order, time, “clicked” hyperlinks, IP addresses,
- peration system and browser software used by the user, cookies and web
- beacons. [7]
- Purpose:
- To track a person’s related activity on the Site, to identify repeat visitors,
time range spent on particular contents, arias of interest on the Site, etc. [7]
- To suggest specific courses that could be of interest to the user. [7]
- To analyze the collective behavior of the users. [7]
25
- III. Related Work- Coursera, edX, Moodle
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback
26
Figure 3: Problems with the existing time tracking algorithm
- IV. Future Work
Beatris Burdeva (TUM) | Bachelor‘s thesis | Final talk | Improving eLearning through statistical feedback