Imprints of Cosmic Phase Transition on Gravitational Waves (GWs) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

imprints of cosmic phase transition on gravitational
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Imprints of Cosmic Phase Transition on Gravitational Waves (GWs) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Imprints of Cosmic Phase Transition on Gravitational Waves (GWs) Takeo Moroi (Tokyo) Refs: Jinno, TM and Nakayama, arXiv:1112.0084 [hep-ph] 1. Introduction Early universe: environment with high-energy particles High temperature high energy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Imprints of Cosmic Phase Transition on Gravitational Waves (GWs)

Takeo Moroi (Tokyo)

Refs: Jinno, TM and Nakayama, arXiv:1112.0084 [hep-ph]

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. Introduction
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Early universe: environment with high-energy particles High temperature ∼ high energy How “deep” can we probe with various objects?

  • Last scattering of photon: ∼ 1 eV
  • Last scattering of neutrino: ∼ 1 MeV
  • “Last scattering” of GWs: inflation

The history of our universe is imprinted in GWs

⇒ We may be able to extract information about high energy

physics which cannot be probed by colliders

⇒ GW spectrum may be precisely measured in (far) future

by, for e.g., DECIGO

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Today’s subject: phase transition (or SSB)

  • QCD phase transition
  • EW symmetry breaking
  • Peccei-Quinn symmetry
  • GUT
  • · · ·

In models with SSB, cosmic phase transition may occur

⇒ Is there any effect on observables? ⇒ If yes, what can we learn?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The spectrum of GWs is affected by cosmic phase transition

  • 1. Primordial GWs are produced during inflation (via quan-

tum fluctuation)

  • 2. Spectrum of GWs is deformed during the cosmic phase

transition Outline

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Gravitational Waves: Production and Evolution
  • 3. Phase Transition
  • 4. Effects of Cosmic Phase Transition on GWs
  • 5. Summary
slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 2. GWs: Production and Evolution
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Story:

  • 1. Primordial GWs are produced during inflation (via quan-

tum fluctuation)

  • 2. Evolution of the amplitudes of GWs depends how the

universe expands

  • 3. Spectrum of GWs is deformed during the cosmic phase

transition Gravitational wave:

  • Fluctuation of the metric (propagating mode)
  • Its evolution is governed by the Einstein equation
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Metric: ds2 = −dt2 + a2(t)(δij + 2hij)dxidxj Physical mode: transverse and traceless (hi

i = hij ,j = 0)

Fourier amplitude (using comoving wave-number

k) hij(t, x) = 1 MPl

∑ λ=+,× ∫

d3 k (2π)3˜ h(λ)

  • k (t)ǫ(λ)

ij ei k x

MPl ≃ 2.4 × 1018 GeV: Reduced Planck scale ǫ(λ)

ij : polarization tensor (transverse & traceless)

˜ h(λ)

  • k (t): Canonically normalized

L(flat) = 1 2M2

Pl ∫

d3xR + · · · ≃

d3 k (2π)3

∑ λ  1

2 ˙ ˜ h

(λ)

  • k ˙

˜ h

(λ) − k + · · ·  

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Gravitational wave in de Sitter background: a ∝ eHinft

L =

d3 k (2π)3a3 ∑

λ  1

2 ˙ ˜ h

(λ)

  • k ˙

˜ h

(λ) − k − 1

2

(k

a

)2

˜ h(λ)

  • k ˜

h(λ)

− k  

⇒ ˜ h(λ)

  • k

behaves as massless scalar field Quantum fluctuation generated during inflation

∆2

h ≡ 1

V

  k3

2π2

  ×

1 M 2

Pl ∑ λ

h(λ)

  • k |2
  • inflation ≃

1 M 2

Pl ∑ λ (Hinf

)2

The primordial GW amplitude is proportional to Hinf

⇒ The effects of GWs become observable when the energy

scale of the inflation is high

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The tensor-to-scalar ratio

r ≡ ∆2

h

∆2

R

(= 16ǫ) R: curvature perturbation (∆2

R ≃ 2.42 × 10−9)

ǫ: Slow-roll parameter

  • WMAP 7 years

⇒ r < 0.24

  • PLANCK / Future CMB interferometric observations

⇒ r as small as 0.1 − 0.01 will be detected

  • Future experiments to detect GWs (DECIGO, · · ·)

⇒ GW spectrum will be observed if r > ∼ ∼ 10−3

slide-11
SLIDE 11

GW evolution after inflation

¨ ˜ h

(λ)

  • k

+ 3H ˙ ˜ h

(λ)

  • k

+ k2 a2(t) ˜ h(λ)

  • k

= 0

with

H = ˙ a a

Before the horizon-in: k ≪ aH

˜ h

k ∼ const.

After the horizon-in: k ≫ aH

−3H ˙ ˜ h

2

  • k = ˙

˜ h

k

¨ ˜ h

k +

k2 a2(t) ˙ ˜ h

h

k = d

dt

 1

2 ˙ ˜ h

2

  • k + 1

2 k2 a2˜ h2

  • k

  + H k2

a2˜ h2

  • k

⇒ d dt

k2

a2˜ h2

  • k
  • sc

≃ −4 ˙ a a

k2

a2˜ h2

  • k
  • sc

˙

˜ h

2

  • k
  • sc

k2

a2˜ h2

  • k
  • sc

˜

h2

  • k
  • sc ∼ a−2
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Amplitude of GWs

⇒ k > ∼ aH: ˜ h

k ∼ const.

⇒ k < ∼ aH: ˜ h2

  • kosc ∼ a−2

Scale Inflation RD Scale factor a Horizon Physical Wavelength

h(λ)

  • k |2
  • sc ≃

h(λ)

  • k |2
  • inflation ×

  a(t)

a|k=aH

  −2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Energy density: ρGW(t) ≡

d ln k ρGW(t; k) ρGW(t; k) = 1 V

  k3

2π2

  × ∑ λ  1

2 ˙ ˜ h

(λ)

  • k ˙

˜ h

(λ) − k + 1

2

(k

a

)2

˜ h(λ)

  • k ˜

h(λ)

− k  

≃ 1 V

  k3

2π2

  × (k

a

)2 ∑ λ

h(λ)

  • k |2
  • sc

( Hinf

2πMPl

)2   a(t)

a|k=aH

  −4

M 2

PlH2 k=aH

For modes which enter the horizon at the RD epoch:

ρGW(t; k) ≃

( Hinf

2πMPl

)2

ρrad(t)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Present GW spectrum:

Ω(tot)

GW = ρ(tot) GW (tNOW)

ρcrit ≡

d ln k ΩGW(k)

In the case without phase transition (i.e., standard case):

Ω(SM)

GW (k) ≃ 1.7 × 10−15r0.1γ : kEW ≪ k ≪ kRH.

r0.1: the tensor-to-scalar ratio in units of 0.1 γ =

 g∗(Tin(k))

g∗0

   

g∗s0 g∗s(Tin(k))

  4/3 ( k

k0

)nt

Ω(SM)

GW (k) is insensitive to k

slide-15
SLIDE 15

In future, GW spectrum may be measured

⇒ BBO / DECIGO

Expected sensitivity

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 3. Phase Transition
slide-17
SLIDE 17

The spectrum of GWs is affected by phase transitions

⇔ There may exist significant entropy production at the time

  • f phase transition

Model: two real scalar fields φ and χ

V (φ) = g 24(φ2 − v2

φ)2 + h

2χ2φ2 φ: scalar field responsible for symmetry breaking χ: degrees of freedom in thermal bath

“Thermal mass” is generated for φ in the thermal bath

⇒ Cosmic phase transition occurs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Potential of φ surrounded by the thermal bath (at φ ∼ 0)

VT(φ) = g 24(φ2 − v2

φ)2 + h

24T 2φ2 + · · · ≡ V0 + h 24(T 2 − T 2

c )φ2 + · · ·

Critical temperature: temperature for V ′′

T (φ = 0) = 0

Tc =

  • 2g

h vφ

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Approximately, the phase transition occurs when V ′′

T (φ = 0) = 0

⇔ Tunneling rate is suppressed when g ≪ 1

Expectation value of φ:

φ =

  

0 : T > Tc vφ: T < Tc

Entropy is produced due to the phase transition

  • Temperature just before the phase transition: Tc
  • Temperature just after the phase transition: TPT > Tc

⇒ ρrad(TPT) = ρrad(Tc) + V0

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Expansion rate at the phase transition:

HPT ≡

  • ρrad(Tc) + V0

3M 2

Pl

The mode which enters the horizon at the phase transition:

kPT ≡ a(tPT)HPT ⇒ k < kPT: out-of-horizon at t = tPT

Present frequency: fPT = kPT/2πaNOW

fPT ≃ 2.7 Hz ×

(

TPT 108 GeV

)

⇒ [fPT]g/h2≪1 ≃ 0.50 Hz ×

  g1/4vφ

108 GeV

 

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Relevant equations to be solved (background):

  • H2 =

( ˙

a a

)2

= ρrad + V0θ(tPT − t) 3M 2

Pl

  • ˙

ρrad + 4Hρrad = V0δ(t − tPT) tPT: time of phase transition (i.e., T = Tc)

Effects of φ

  • Deviation from the radiation-domination at t ∼ tPT
  • Entropy production due to the phase transition
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Evolution of the universe (with h = 1):

H = 1 2t in RD V0 ρrad(Tc) ∼ O(1) × h2 g∗g g∗: Effective number of massless degrees of freedom

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • 4. Imprints of Phase Transition in GWs
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Behavior of GW amplitudes:

  • k ≤ kPT: No effect of phase transition
  • k ≥ kPT: Density is diluted due to the entropy production

Scale Inflation After inflation (RD, ...) Time H Phase Transition k < kPT k > kPT k = kPT

  • 1

P h y s i c a l W a v e l e n g t h = a / k

⇒ ΩGW(k > ∼ kPT) is suppressed

slide-25
SLIDE 25

“Short wavelength (i.e., high frequency)” mode: k ≥ kPT

  • 1. The amplitude is constant until the horizon-reentry

[ρGW(k)]k=aH ≃ ρGW(t = 0)

  • 2. ρGW(k) ∝ a−4 once the mode enters the horizon

[ρGW(k)] (t) ≃ [ρGW(k)]k=aH

(ahorizon-in

aPT

)4   aPT

a(t)

  4

≃ [ρGW(k)]k=aH

(Thorizon-in

Tc

)−4   TPT

T(t)

  −4

( Tc

TPT

)4

[ρGW(k)]no phase transition

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ΩGW(k > ∼ kPT) becomes suppressed R ≡ ΩGW(k) Ω(SM)

GW (k)

  • k≫kPT

=

( Tc

TPT

)4

= ρrad(Tc) ρrad(Tc) + V0

Spectrum of GWs: result of numerical calculation

fPT = kPT 2πaNOW ≃ 2.7 Hz

(

TPT 108 GeV

)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What can we learn from the GW spectrum?

  • Position of the drop-off (∼ fPT)

⇒ “Reheating temperature” after the phase transition

  • Magnitude of the drop-off (R)

⇒ Entropy production

  • Slope of the drop-off (∼ dΩGW/d ln k)

⇒ Time scale of the reheating (instantaneous or ?)

GWs from white dwarf binaries are significant for small-f

⇒ It will be difficult to extract the signal of cosmic phase

transition in the GW spectrum if fPT <

∼ 0.1 Hz

[Farmer & Phinney]

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Detectability of the “drop-off” signal

  • Drop-off of ΩGW should be bigger than the sensitivity

⇒ Lower bound on R

  • ΩGW(k >

∼ kpt) should be observable ⇒ Upper bound on R

Comparison with the BBO-corr sensitivity:

  • (r, fPT) = (0.1, 0.1 Hz)

0.005 < R < 0.98 ⇒ 1.5 × 10−6 < g < 0.014 (for h = 1)

  • (r, fPT) = (0.1, 1 Hz)

0.17 < R < 0.83 ⇒ 6.0 × 10−5 < g < 0.0014 (for h = 1)

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • 5. Summary
slide-30
SLIDE 30

GW spectrum contains information about the early universe Example: Cosmic phase transition

⇒ If a cosmic phase transition occurred, its effect may

be imprinted in the spectrum of GWs Message: GWs are interesting because

  • Various information about the early universe is imprinted

in GWs

  • In a future, precise determination of the GW spectrum

may be performed by satellite experiments

⇒ If a non-vanishing value of r is confirmed, DECIGO (or

anything else) is strongly suggested as the next project