Implementation of UCITS V in the UK Karagh Gilliatt and Aidan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Implementation of UCITS V in the UK Karagh Gilliatt and Aidan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Implementation of UCITS V in the UK Karagh Gilliatt and Aidan Campbell UK 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 Agenda - Overview of the key elements of UCITS V - Highlight where the provisions differ from the equivalent AIFMD provisions - Summary
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Agenda
2
- Overview of the key elements of UCITS V
- Highlight where the provisions differ from the equivalent AIFMD
provisions
- Summary of UK proposals for implementation
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Snapshot of UCITS V Legislative History
3
- Recast UCITS Directive (2009/65/EC)
- Implemented in UK
- UCITS V Directive (2014/91/EC)
- Requires Member State Implementation
- Commission's Delegated Regulation on obligations of Depositaries
– “Level 2”
- Directly applicable – no Member State implementation required
- ESMA Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies – “Level 3”
- Requires Member State adoption
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
UK Proposed Implementation
4
- Amendments to Collective Investment Schemes Sourcebook (“COLL”)
- COLL 4.2.5: prospectus updates
- COLL 4.7: KIID update
- COLL 4.5: Annual report
- COLL 6.6A: requirements regarding ManCo in respect of depositaries
- New COLL 6.6B: requirements on UCITS depositaries
- Requirements in COLL 6.6A and 6.6B broadly similar to FUND 3.11
- New SYSC19E
- Other amendments to Glossary, CASS, SUP and IPRU (INV)
- Amendment to FSMA and secondary legislation
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Timeline
5
UCITS V Directive published 28 August 2014 23 July 2015 3 September 2015 23 October 2015 FCA publishes CP15/27 ESMA publishes draft Guidelines on sound remuneration under UCITS V and AIFMD UCITS V Level 2 Regulations issued by European Commission Deadline for implementation by Member States HM Treasury publishes consultation Level 2 Regulations to be finalised and published in Official Journal Expect: FCA Policy Statement and made legislation Date of application
- f Level 2
Regulations? 17 December 2015 Q1 2016 18 March 2016 Q3 2016
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
UCITS V – Key Elements
6
- The key elements of UCITS V are uniform rules on:
- UCITS depositary functions
- UCITS Management company (“ManCo”) remuneration requirements
- Sanctions
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary Provisions
7
- Depositary provisions have not changed since introduction of UCITS
in 1985 - readjustment arguably overdue!
- Principal components:
- Appointment and eligibility of the depositary
- Safekeeping of assets
- Delegation
- Oversight
- Liability
- Many of the detailed UCITS V depositary requirements are contained
in delegated European Commission Regulations (“Level 2 Regulations”)
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Eligibility Criteria
8
- Prescribed classes of institution eligible to be depositaries
- National central banks
- Credit institutions
- Other legal entities authorised to carry out UCITS depositary activities
- (“non-bank depositaries”), which must
- be subject to prudential regulation requirements
- be subject to regulatory supervision
- meet certain minimum operational requirements
- FCA “gold-plating”
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Appointment (1)
9
- ManCo must appoint a single depositary for each UCITS it manages
- ManCo must have in place a decision-making process for choosing
the depositary
- ManCo must demonstrate satisfaction of appointment to the UCITS’
home Member State competent authority
- ManCo must also justify to UCITS investors, on request, its choice of
depositary
- Must be written contract in place between ManCo and depositary
- Both UCITS depositary and ManCo must act “honestly, fairly,
professionally and solely in the interests of the UCITS and the investors of the UCITS”
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Appointment (2)
10
- Level 2 Regulations, Chapter 4: independence requirements
- ManCo and depositary must at all times comply with certain conditions
which are designed to ensure independence of the depositary.
- In certain limited circumstances, ManCo may appoint a linked depositary.
- Tends not to be an issue for UK funds and provisions are designed to allow
continuation of practices in Continental Europe.
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Written Contact (1)
11
- The Level 2 Regulations require the written contract with the
depositary to include (broadly):
- Description of services
- Information flows
- Processes and procedures
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Written Contact (2)
12
- More specifically:
- A description of depositary services and the depositary’s procedures for
each type of assets in which the UCITS may invest;
- A description of how the safekeeping and oversight functions will be
performed;
- The term of the contract and the requirements for amendment and
termination;
- The parties’ respective confidentiality obligations;
- Provisions regarding transmission of information between depositary and
ManCo (and, if applicable, any third party);
- Procedures to be followed when considering an amendment to the UCITS’
rules, instrument of incorporation or offering documents;
- Information which must be exchanged in respect of sale, subscription,
redemption, issue, cancellation and repurchase of units of the UCITS;
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Written Contact (3)
13
- A commitment to regularly provide details of any third party appointed by
the ManCo or depositary, and, upon request, information on the selection criteria and on monitoring procedures regarding the appointment;
- The parties’ obligations regarding prevention of money laundering and
terrorist financing;
- Information on cash accounts in the ManCo’s name on the UCITS’ behalf
and procedures for ensuring the depositary is notified of the opening of new accounts;
- Details of the depositary’s escalation procedures;
- A commitment by the depositary to notify the ManCo that the segregation
- f assets is no longer sufficient to ensure protection from insolvency of a
third party to whom safekeeping has been delegated;
- Procedures for ensuring the depositary has the ability to enquire into the
conduct of the ManCo, including rights of access, and for ensuring the ManCo can review the performance of the depositary.
- Requirements broadly mirror the requirements for depositary contracts
prescribed by AIFMD.
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Safekeeping of Assets
14
- Division of asset types
- Financial Instruments which can be held in custody
- Transferable securities (including those embedding derivatives)
- MMIs
- CIS units (but not necessarily all)
- Other assets
- Cash deposits
- Derivatives
- Other CIS units
- Comprehensive inventory of all assets to be provided by depositary
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Safekeeping of Assets: Custody
15
- Where the depositary holds FIs in custody its duties include:
- Ensure proper registration
- Ensure segregation
- Perform asset reconciliation
- Maintain records
- Prohibition on the re-use of assets
- Limited exception
- Stock lending subject to certain criteria.
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary - Safekeeping of Assets: Other Assets
16
- No requirement to hold legal title to those other assets
- Ownership verification required
- Depositary to maintain record
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Delegation (1)
17
- Restrictions on delegation by depositary
- Depositary may only delegate custody function
- Such delegation only permitted where:
- it is not aimed at avoiding UCITS V requirements;
- there is an objective reason for delegation;
- due skill, care and diligence has been exercised in the selection and
appointment
- ongoing monitoring of the delegate required
- No contractual discharge of liability is permitted
- AIF depositaries may discharge liability in certain circumstances
- Depositary must ensure delegate complies with depositary’s obligations
under written agreement with ManCo
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Delegation (2)
18
- Depositary required to ensure the delegate takes all necessary steps
to ensure that the assets of a UCITS held by it in custody are unavailable for delegate’s creditors in event of its insolvency
- High standard
- independent legal advice required
- Early termination of agreement
- Inform ManCo
- ManCo to inform FCA and take all appropriate measures
- EEA delegate required to provide a regular statement to the depositary
detailing the assets
- Also when a change occurs
- Provisions to apply down the custody chain
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Oversight Obligations (1)
19
- Oversight obligations on depositary in respect of:
- Cash monitoring
- Valuation
- Sale/issue/redemption/cancellation of Shares
- Income Distribution
- Strategy & risk profile of UCITS relevant
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Liability (1)
20
- Depositary liability provisions mirror AIFMD provisions
- depositary is liable for losses of financial instruments held in custody,
unless it can show that loss has arisen “as a result of an external event beyond its reasonable control, the consequences of which would have been unavoidable despite all reasonable efforts to the contrary”
- No need to establish fault
- Also liable for all other losses suffered by UCITS and investors as a result
- f the depositary’s “negligent or intentional failure to properly fulfil its
- bligations”
- Applies to all asset types.
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Liability (2)
21
- Chapter 3 of the Level 2 Regulations: sets out the circumstances in
which a financial instrument held in custody shall be deemed to be “lost”
- A financial instrument held in custody is “lost” if any of the following
- ccurs:
- a stated right of ownership of the UCITS is demonstrated not to be valid
because it either ceased to exist or never existed;
- the UCITS has been definitively deprived of its right of ownership over the
instrument; or
- the UCITS is definitively unable to directly or indirectly dispose of the
instrument.
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Depositary – Liability (3)
22
- Article 19 of the Level 2 Regulations sets out the circumstances where
the depositary is not liable for loss of financial instruments held in custody, broadly:
- No act or omission of the depositary or its delegate;
- The depositary could not have reasonably prevented the occurrence of the
event despite adopting all reasonable precautions; and
- The depositary could not have prevented the loss despite rigorous and
comprehensive due diligence, documented in accordance with the requirements of the Level 2 Regulations
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Remuneration - Background
23
- Part of broader campaign by European Commission:
- Perceived disconnect between remuneration of certain staff and
performance
- “Variable remuneration” and disclosure seen as particular issue
- UCITS V remuneration requirements aimed at realigning the interests of
such staff with the UCITS they manage / provide services to
- Similar measures already in place in respect of AIFMD and CRD IV
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Remuneration - Key Requirements
24
- ManCo required to put in place remuneration policies & practices that:
- are consistent with & promote sound & effective risk management; and
- do not encourage risk taking or impair compliance with duty to act in the
best interests of the UCITS
- Remuneration policies and practices must comply with 18 stated
remuneration principles, but no bonus cap
- FCA’s implementation:
- 14 Remuneration Principles under the Code
- Incorporate all 18 principles set out in UCITS V
- Broadly replicate the remuneration principles applicable to AIFMs under the
AIFMD Code but a number of differences
- Compliance with principles must be “appropriate to [the ManCo’s] size,
internal organisation and the nature, scope and complexity of their activities”
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
What is “remuneration”?
25
- UCITS V: “any benefit of any type paid by [ManCo]… any amount paid
directly by the UCITS itself, including performance fees… any transfer
- f units or shares in the UCITS”
- ESMA Guidance: “all forms of payments or benefits paid by the
management company, any amount paid by the UCITS itself and any transfer of units or shares in the UCITS, in exchange for professional services rendered by the management company’s identified staff”
- Includes fixed and variable components of salary and pension benefits
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Notable UCITS Remuneration Principles replicating AIFMD Code Principles
26
- Remuneration Principle 1: Risk management
- Remuneration Principle 3: Governance
- Requirement for remuneration committees for “significant” ManCos
- Remuneration Principle 5(c): Fixed and variable components of total
remuneration
- Remuneration Principle 8: Personal investment strategies
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Differences between UCITS Code and AIFMD Code (1): Governance
UCITS Code
- management body required to
review “at least annually” the general principles of the remuneration policy
- remuneration committee
required to take into account the public interest when preparing its decisions AIFMD Code
- management body must
“periodically review” policy
- no such requirement
27
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Differences between UCITS Code and AIFMD Code (2): Assessment of Performance
UCITS Code
- ManCo must ensure that
assessment of performance- related remuneration takes into account the investment risks of the UCITS and the risks of the ManCo, as well as overall results and long-term performance AIFMD Code
- no requirement to consider risks
as part of assessment process, but must spread payment of remuneration over period which takes account of redemption policy of AIFs and their investment risks.
28
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Differences between UCITS Code and AIFMD Code (3): Retention of Units, shares etc
UCITS Code
- a substantial portion, and at
least 50%, of variable remuneration must comprise certain financial instruments or equivalent non-cash instruments with equally effective incentives as the other instruments. AIFMD Code
- no requirement for equivalent
non-cash instruments to have equally effective incentives
29
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Differences between UCITS Code and AIFMD Code (4): Deferral
UCITS Code
- at least 40% of variable
remuneration should be deferred for at least three years AIFMD Code
- deferral should be for at least
three to five years, unless the lifecycle of the AIF is shorter.
30
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Who must policies/practices apply to?
31
- Identified Staff
- Those categories of staff whose professional activities have a material
impact on ManCo’s risk profile or risk profile of the UCITS managed by it
- includes senior mgmt, risk takers, control functions and any employee receiving
total remuneration that falls into the bracket of senior mgmt/risk takers
- Delegates and others not employed directly by ManCo
- Equivalence test
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Multiplicity of Remuneration Codes
32
- Recognition that some Identified Staff may be subject to different
sectoral remuneration codes. ESMA proposes the following basis for calculation of remuneration:
- Pro rate; or
- Apply sectoral code which is most effective in discouraging excessive risk
taking.
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Remuneration - Proportionality
33
- ManCos are required to comply with the Remuneration Principles in a
proportionate manner
- Size
- internal organisation
- nature, scope and complexity of activities
- Proportionality to different categories of staff
- Certain remuneration principals may be disapplied
- Deferral
- Instruments
- Malus/clawback
- Rationale for disapplication
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Remuneration – Proportionality: FCA Stance
34
- FCA proposed that pay-out process may be disapplied when both:
- Variable remuneration in respect of X is no more than 33% of total
remuneration; and
- Total remuneration is no more than £500,000.
- FCA may consider further guidance or changes to its approach in
future.
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Sanctions (1)
35
- Member States required to impose administrative sanctions & other
measures for breaches of national implementing measures
- Sanctions required to be “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”
- Sanctions will apply to members of management body of UCITS /
ManCo/ depositary
- Administrative penalties must include at least the following:
- Public statement identifying the infringing person and nature of
infringement;
- Cease and desist orders;
- Pecuniary sanctions (i.e. fines)
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Sanctions (2)
36
- 19 specific grounds for administrative penalties set out in UCITS V
- Member States have discretion to “gold plate” offences
- Minor amendments proposed to FSMA to clarify that breaches of UK
legislation implementing the UCITS Directive trigger the FCA’s existing sanctions
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Sanctions (3)
37
- Member States required to establish whistle-blowing mechanisms
- Sufficient whistle-blowing requirements arguably already in place in
UK
- Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA)
- SYSC 18
- HM Treasury proposes only minor changes to existing rules
- FCA also proposes including provisions in Handbook requiring ManCo and
depositaries to implement whistleblowing procedures for use by employees to report breaches
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Changes to documentation
38
- Updates required to fund documentation:
- Prospectuses
- Trust Deeds
- Annual reports
- KIIDs
- Updates required to agreements e.g. ACD agreements, Depositary
agreement, IMAs and contracts of employment
- Compliant remuneration policy
- Transitional provisions for certain fund documentation updates
- No transitional provisions for other documentation: must be compliant
by 18 March 2016
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Next Steps
39
- Publication of final guidance and technical standards by ESMA :
expected February 2016
- FCA Policy Statement setting out final rules: expected soon
- Domestic implementing measures: must be in place by 18 March 2016
UK – 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm
Contact us
40
- Karagh Gilliatt, Partner
- karagh.gilliatt@cms-cmck.com
- +44 131 200 7308
- Aidan Campbell, Partner
- aidan.campbell@cms-cmck.com
- +44 141 304 6112
- www.cms-cmck.com
UK - 210969696.1 | 20 January 2016 CMS Firm 41
CMS Legal Services EEIG (CMS EEIG) is a European Economic Interest Grouping that coordinates an
- rganisation of independent law firms. CMS EEIG provides no client services. Such services are solely
provided by CMS EEIG’s member firms in their respective jurisdictions. CMS EEIG and each of its member firms are separate and legally distinct entities, and no such entity has any authority to bind any
- ther. CMS EEIG and each member firm are liable only for their own acts or omissions and not those of
each other. The brand name “CMS” and the term “firm” are used to refer to some or all of the member firms or their offices. CMS locations: Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing, Belgrade, Berlin, Bratislava, Bristol, Brussels, Bucharest, Budapest, Casablanca, Cologne, Dubai, Duesseldorf, Edinburgh, Frankfurt, Geneva, Glasgow, Hamburg, Istanbul, Kyiv, Leipzig, Lisbon, Ljubljana, London, Luxembourg, Lyon, Madrid, Mexico City, Milan, Moscow, Munich, Muscat, Paris, Podgorica, Prague, Rio de Janeiro, Rome, Sarajevo, Seville, Shanghai, Sofia, Strasbourg, Stuttgart, Tirana, Utrecht, Vienna, Warsaw, Zagreb and Zurich. www.cmslegal.com Your free online legal information service. A subscription service for legal articles
- n a variety of topics delivered by email.
www.cms-lawnow.com Your expert legal publications online. In-depth international legal research and insights that can be personalised. eguides.cmslegal.com