Implem lementing enting the e Continuu ntinuum m of Car are e - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implem lementing enting the e continuu ntinuum m of car
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implem lementing enting the e Continuu ntinuum m of Car are e - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Implem lementing enting the e Continuu ntinuum m of Car are e for r Su Subst stance ance Us Use e Di Diso sorder rders s in in P Pri rimar ary y Car are: e: Find Fi ndings ings an and Les essons sons Lea earned rned


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Implem lementing enting the e Continuu ntinuum m of Car are e for r Su Subst stance ance Us Use e Di Diso sorder rders s in in P Pri rimar ary y Car are: e: Fi Find ndings ings an and Les essons sons Lea earned rned from the e SU SUMM MMIT T St Study dy

Karen Lamp, MD, Venice Family Clinic Allison Ober, MSW, PhD, RAND Corporation Tobin Shelton, LCSW, Venice Family Clinic

Statewide wide Integrat egrated ed Care e Conf nfere erence nce Octobe

  • ber 25, 2017
slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/25/17 Slide 2

INTRODUCTION

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/25/17 Slide 3

Today’s objectives

  • Describe and discuss a model for integrating

the continuum of care for substance use disorders (SUDs) into primary care services in a federally qualified health center

  • Discuss barriers and solutions to integrating

the continuum of care for substance use disorders into primary care services of a federally qualified health center

  • Share key elements of sustaining the

continuum of care for substance use disorders in primary care

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/25/17 Slide 4

In the beginning….

Partnership between RAND Corporation and Venice Family Clinic began in 2012

– Opportunity to participate in NIH/NIDA funded research – Chance to add a new service line to

  • ur primary care menu

– Participation provided a substantial funding opportunity for VFC

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/25/17 Slide 5

Venice Family Clinic

  • Community Health Center

located on Westside of Los Angeles

  • Venice Family Clinic is the

medical home for 25,000 people

  • $37M annual budget

That’s me!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/25/17 Slide 6

RAND Corporation

  • Non-profit research

institute headquartered in Santa Monica, CA

  • RAND Health conducts

research and analysis to improve health services and policy

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/25/17 Slide 7

Welcome addition or clinic disruption?

  • Opioid epidemic had not yet gained widespread public

attention in 2012

  • VFC was in midst of implementing EMR
  • Primary care overload/burn out was a significant

dynamic at the clinic

  • Anticipating ACA’s impact
  • Expected to be flooded with new patients
  • New and stable funding for the clinic
  • Adding SUD services tested the VFC’s culture and

attitudes

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/25/17 Slide 8

Key perceived barriers

  • Identified barriers to integrating SUD treatment prior

to the study

  • Barriers fell into three areas:

1. Training 2. Resources 3. Culture

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/25/17 Slide 9

Key perceived tr traini aining ng barriers

  • Providers don’t feel knowledgeable enough to

provide SUD treatment

  • Providers worry that they haven’t had adequate

training to treat SUD patients

  • There is too much staff turnover – it’s hard to keep

everyone trained

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/25/17 Slide 10

Key perceived re resour

  • urces

ces barriers

  • There isn’t enough time to commit to SUD patients
  • There is not enough staff to provide SUD treatment
slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/25/17 Slide 11

Key perceived cul ultura tural barriers

  • There is a lack of motivation to provide SUD treatment
  • SUD treatment should have a dedicated provider or

specialty clinic

  • There are barriers to treating the homeless population
  • Patients with mental health comorbidities may not be

appropriate

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10/25/17 Slide 12

Key perceived cul ultura tural barriers

  • The clinic may attract too many SUD patients who

would disrupt the clinic (Stigma/bias)

  • The clinic has a no-narcotic policy
  • Providers fear SUD treatment will not remain a priority

among leadership (Sustainability)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10/25/17 Slide 13

SUMMIT Study Overview

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10/25/17 Slide 14

We set out to address barriers and implement the continuum of care for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment

Screening by Medical Assistants Brief Intervention by Medical Providers Warm handoff to a Care Coordinator Medications Prescribed by Medical Providers 6-session MI- based Therapy by Behavioral Health Therapists Extended – release injectable naltrexone (alcohol) (XR-NTX) Buprenorphine/ naloxone (opioids) (BUP/NX)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10/25/17 Slide 15

We examined the effectiveness of a two- part implementation intervention

Organizational Readiness Intervention Collaborative Care Intervention

  • Goal: To prepare the organization to deliver

SUD treatment services using collaborative care (CC)

  • Evaluated using a pre-post design
  • Goal: To increase patient linkage to and primary

care providers’ use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and brief treatment (BT) for

  • pioid and alcohol use disorders (OAUD)*
  • Evaluated using a randomized design

*We focus used ed on OAUD becau ause e both

  • th have

e a substan tanti tial al impact act on publ blic ic health lth and there ere are medicat dications

  • ns considered

idered to be best t practi ctices ces for treating ating these se disorder ers

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10/25/17 Slide 16

We started with the organizational readiness intervention

Organizational Readiness Outcomes Organizational Readiness Intervention

  • Acceptability
  • Appropriateness
  • Feasibility
  • Willing to Use BT
  • r MAT
  • Adoption of BT or

MAT

  • XR-NTX, BUP/NX

and Brief Therapy utilization

  • OAUD abstinence
  • Plan for change
  • Educate providers
  • Redesign service

delivery system

  • Incorporate quality

improvement

Service Delivery Intervention

Collaborative Care (CC) versus Usual Care

Patient Service Utilization and Clinical Outcomes

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10/25/17 Slide 17

The organizational readiness intervention consisted of a cluster of implementation strategies

Plan for Change Educate Providers Incorporate Quality Improvement Restructure Delivery Systems

  • Gathered info

about current processes

  • Obtained

feedback on perceived barriers from all staff and leadership through focus groups and interviews

  • Educated all

providers at every level

  • Identified MAT

and BT champions

  • Informed

stakeholders (e.g., Boards of Directors)

  • Created new

workflow for patients with OAUDs

  • Developed

treatment and CC protocols

  • Conducted

Plan-Do-Study- Act cycles to introduce new practices

  • Pilot tested all

practices

  • Adapted

protocols to address barriers

slide-18
SLIDE 18

10/25/17 Slide 18

We measured organizational readiness

  • utcomes at four time points through

provider focus groups, interviews and surveys

Organizational Readiness Outcomes Organizational Readiness Intervention

  • Acceptability
  • Appropriateness
  • Feasibility
  • Willing to Use BT
  • r MAT
  • Adoption of BT or

MAT

  • XR-NTX, BUP/NX

and Brief Therapy utilization

  • OAUD abstinence
  • Plan for change
  • Educate providers
  • Redesign service

delivery system

Service Delivery Intervention

Collaborative Care (CC) versus Usual Care

Service Utilization and Clinical Outcomes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

10/25/17 Slide 19

18 months after we started organizational readiness, we implemented and tested the CC service delivery intervention

Organizational Readiness Outcomes Organizational Readiness Intervention

  • Acceptability
  • Appropriateness
  • Feasibility
  • Willing to Use BT
  • r MAT
  • Adoption of BT or

MAT

  • XR-NTX, BUP/NX

and Brief Therapy utilization

  • OAUD abstinence
  • Plan for change
  • Educate providers
  • Redesign service

delivery system

Service Delivery Intervention

Collaborative Care (CC) versus Usual Care RCT

Service Utilization and Clinical Outcomes

slide-20
SLIDE 20

10/25/17 Slide 20

The CC intervention was designed to facilitate treatment linkage and retention

Patient Self-Mgmt. Materials Care Coordination and Monitoring Patient Registry Experts available for consultation and supervision

CC encourages the delivery of evidence-based treatments

slide-21
SLIDE 21

10/25/17 Slide 21

After the RCT, we measured patient service utilization and clinical outcomes

Provider Implementation Outcomes Organizational Readiness Intervention

  • Acceptability
  • Appropriateness
  • Feasibility
  • Willing to Use BT
  • r MAT
  • Adoption of BT or

MAT

  • XR-NTX, BUP/NX

and BT utilization

  • OAUD abstinence
  • Plan for change
  • Educate providers
  • Redesign service

delivery system

Service Delivery Intervention

Collaborative Care (CC) versus Usual Care

Service Utilization and Clinical Outcomes

slide-22
SLIDE 22

10/25/17 Slide 22

Needless to say, we had our work cut out for us ...

slide-23
SLIDE 23

10/25/17 Slide 23

... and things didn’t always go exactly as planned, but we did it.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

10/25/17 Slide 24

Participant enrollment took place between June 3, 2014 and January 15, 2016

  • All clinic patients were screened for risky alcohol or
  • pioid use at every visit (about 15,000 patients of

15,753 visits, about 95% of all visits)

  • 4-6% screened positive for risky or worse substance

use

  • Patients that consented were referred to a survey

interviewer for further screening and enrollment

  • We enrolled 392 individuals and had a 69% 6-

month follow-up rate

slide-25
SLIDE 25

10/25/17 Slide 25

Key Organizational Readiness Findings

slide-26
SLIDE 26

10/25/17 Slide 26

3.05 3.36 4.77* 4.77* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XR-NTX Ease of Use (1=Extremely Disagree - 7=Extremely Agree) XR-NTX Compatibilitiy with Current Practices (1=Extremely Disagree - 7 Extremely Agree) Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

*p<.05

Medical providers’ perceptions of ease of use and compatibility of medical treatment for alcohol use disorders increased one year after organizational readiness intervention

slide-27
SLIDE 27

10/25/17 Slide 27

Medical providers’ perceptions of appropriateness in primary care also improved after one year

3.00 4.53* 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 SUD Can be Effectively Treated in Primary Care (1=Strongly Disagree - 5=Strongly Agree) Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

*p<.05

slide-28
SLIDE 28

10/25/17 Slide 28

General clinic staff perceptions of appropriateness also improved after one year

3.17 3.17 2.94 4.53* 4.25* 3.89 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SUD Can be Effectively Treated in Primary Care SUD Can be Effectively Treated at VFC Providing Medication to People with SUD Fits with Clinic Mission and Goals Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention

*p<.01

slide-29
SLIDE 29

10/25/17 Slide 29

All staff perceptions of acceptability and appropriateness improved and were sustained

  • ver time

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Plannin Planning Pilot Pilot RCT RCT Pos Post-RCT t-RCT Substance use disorders can be effectively treated in primary care Substance use disorders can effectively be treated at [this clinic] Providing medications to patients with alcohol or opioid use disorders fits with [THIS CLINIC'S] mission and goals Providing counseling to patients with alcohol or opioid use disorders fits with [THIS CLINIC'S] mission and goals

(Orga ganizati tion

  • nal Readiness

ess)

Differences from first to last year, p < 0.001;

Agreement

slide-30
SLIDE 30

10/25/17 Slide 30

Fast forward five years ..., the majority of medical providers attended training and many are prescribing MAT

  • 24/28 providers trained on use of extended-release

naltrexone (XR-NTX)

  • 16 have prescribed XR-NTX
  • 21/28 attended buprenorphine/naloxone training

(BUP/NX); 10 have X-waivers

  • 10 have prescribed BUP/NX
slide-31
SLIDE 31

10/25/17 Slide 31

In the words of one VFC medical provider: “SUMMIT has completely changed the culture of care at Venice Family Clinic”

clinic

slide-32
SLIDE 32

10/25/17 Slide 32

Key Findings: CC versus Usual Care

slide-33
SLIDE 33

10/25/17 Slide 33

The majority of participants were male; one third were Hispanic, almost half were White; more than one third were homeless

Overall (n=377*) % Usual Care (n=187) % CC (n=190) % Male 80 80 79 Ethnicity (% Hispanic) 31 32 30 Race White 44 45 42 Black 13 14 13 Multi-Racial/Other 41 39 43 Homeless Status Homeless 37.1 40.7 33.5 *Analytic sample size

slide-34
SLIDE 34

10/25/17 Slide 34

Half of the patients had alcohol use disorders without an opioid use disorder

Overall (n=377) % Usual Care (n=187) % CC (n=190) % Alcohol Only 54 52 56 Heroin, with or without Alcohol or Prescription Opioids 31 34 27 Prescription Opioid Dependence with our without Alcohol 16 24 27

slide-35
SLIDE 35

10/25/17 Slide 35

CC patients were more likely to receive any evidence-based practice, and more likely to receive BT but not more likely to receive MAT than UC patients

39 35.8 13.4 16.8 10.5 12.6

Percent Evidence-based Practices

ICC UC **p<.0001

slide-36
SLIDE 36

10/25/17 Slide 36

CC patients were more likely to be abstinent from all substances 6 months after enrollment than UC patients

32.8 26.3 22.3 15.6

Percent Abstinence Outcomes

ICC UC *p<.05

slide-37
SLIDE 37

10/25/17 Slide 37

SUMMIT Study Take-Aways

Take-away y 1: A strat rategy egy consisting isting of BOTH TH organiza anizatio tional nal readin dines ess s and collaborativ aborative e care can facilitat itate e implemen lementat tation n of SUD D treat eatmen ment t in n primar imary care e and nd lead to improved ed patien ient t

  • utcom
  • mes

es Take-away y 2: A collaborativ aborative care e servic vice e deliver ery y inter erven enti tion

  • n is

critical tical to helpin ping g pati tient nts s initiat tiate e SUD D treatmen atment t in prima imary y care Take-away y 3: Pa Pati tien ents ts who receiv eive e any treatme eatment nt (wit ith h CC) ) do bett etter er than n those se who do not, regar gardless dless of type of treatmen atment Take-away y 4: Despit pite e perceiv eived ed barrier riers, s, treatme eatment nt can be success essfully ully integrat egrated ed

slide-38
SLIDE 38

10/25/17 Slide 38

Overcoming Barriers to Integrating SUD Treatment in Primary Care

slide-39
SLIDE 39

10/25/17 Slide 39

Overcoming barriers

  • Understand the perceived barriers in your organization so

you can address them effectively

  • 1. Training
  • 2. Resources
  • 3. Culture
slide-40
SLIDE 40

10/25/17 Slide 40

Overcoming TRAINING barriers: Lack of expertise and need for technical support

Med edic ical Provid ider ers: s: – XR-NTX training: 2 ½ hours in person – BUP/NX training: 4 hours in person, 4 hours on- line module – Cash incentives for providers to get X-waiver Beh ehaviora ioral Hea ealth h Provi vide ders: s: – 8+ hours of MI-based brief therapy intervention *Plus: Ref efre resher her Train inin ings gs and accessible Expe pert t Consulta ltati tion

  • n
slide-41
SLIDE 41

10/25/17 Slide 41

Overcoming TRAINING Barriers: Written procedures for referral and treatment

slide-42
SLIDE 42

10/25/17 Slide 42

Overcoming RESOURCE barriers

  • Develop warm handoff with care manager into behavioral

health

  • Additional time (30 minutes) for providers for new SUMMIT

clients

  • Providers given permission to just address patient’s

addiction at SUMMIT visit

slide-43
SLIDE 43

10/25/17 Slide 43

Overcoming CULTURAL barriers

  • Identify motivated champions to spread buy-in

– Clinical leadership champion (CMO) – Behavioral health champion (Director of BH) – Medical provider champion (AMD)

  • Show early successes through small pilots

– P-D-S-A (Plan-Do-Study-Act) – Use your champions for the pilots

  • Train all staff in HARM REDUCTION philosophy
slide-44
SLIDE 44

10/25/17 Slide 44

Sustainability and New Directions for SUMMIT

slide-45
SLIDE 45

10/25/17 Slide 45

Sustain by developing workforce

Staffin ing: g:

  • HRSA MAT Expansion
  • Add expertise and new staff—CADC, CAADE, dedicated case

management, prescribers (currently 10)

  • Provide clear information about transition
  • Expand education and training -- Workshops and trainings
  • n harm reduction, MAT etc…
  • Merger with syringe exchange and HIV program (Common

Ground)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

10/25/17 Slide 46

Sustain by trusting what works

Ope peration ions s and d clin inic ical: l:

  • Screenings and referrals (PHQ-9; NIDA quick screen bi-

annual)

  • Co-location of BH and medical services already in place
  • Care coordination
slide-47
SLIDE 47

10/25/17 Slide 47

Sustain by learning from others

  • Treating Addiction in Primary Care (TAPC) involvement
  • RAND relationships
  • Encouraging continuing education webinars
  • Expert consultation
slide-48
SLIDE 48

10/25/17 Slide 48

Sustain by learning from participants

Sug ugge gesti tions:

  • ns:
  • “I don’t like that our sessions are limited to 45 min. And

rooms are not always available.”

  • “Healthier snacks…potluck.” “Pizza night would be good.”
  • “I think we should go outside and walk and talk to the

people outside [these] walls about our program we can be good in a pack.”

  • “Meditation”
  • “How do we [SUMMIT staff] cope?”
  • “Will this program change/go away?”
slide-49
SLIDE 49

10/25/17 Slide 49

Positi sitive feedba eedback: ck: Wh What at does es SUM UMMI MIT T mean ean to you? u?

  • “SUMMIT gave me a new life I was re-born with happiness by

talking about my pain, distress etc. I’ve been able to see life in a different positive way through the pain of my fellows and love, compassion, understanding of the SUMMIT group of women…”

  • “Support, family.”
  • “This is the place where I learned I actually had options for my

life and things could get better.”

  • “Community, safety, support, love, hope, encouragement,

laughter, purpose.”

  • “People to love and care about me in this sometimes cold world.”

Sustain by learning from participants

slide-50
SLIDE 50

10/25/17 Slide 50

Working with clinic staff and providers

slide-51
SLIDE 51

10/25/17 Slide 51

Sustain by helping staff visualize workflow

slide-52
SLIDE 52

10/25/17 Slide 52

NEW! – Team of BH professionals!

  • Case

e managemen nagement t to support transportation, linkage to care, and personal and professional goals

  • Indiv

ividu idual al and/or /or group up thera erapy with addiction counselor or LCSW to support emotional and community health

  • Suppor

port t groups ps focused on individualized treatment plan— bio-psycho-social-spiritual

IMP MPOR ORTANT! NT! On Ongoing going ca care co coor

  • rdina

dination tion sustaine tained d from m SUMMIT MMIT ha has be been en cr criti tical cal to supp ppor

  • rtin

ting g rela lationships tionships wi with th me medical ical provider viders s an and sta taff

slide-53
SLIDE 53

10/25/17 Slide 53

Harm reduction on the continuum of care

Accept epting ng us use as f s fact: t:

  • We are inviting people who use alcohol or other drugs inside

Being ng honest

  • nest about
  • ut what

t is s available: ble:

  • The range of care from coffee and fliers to MAT; counseling; support

through in-home induction; referral to sober living…. Sett etting ng shor

  • rt-term

erm and achie ievable able goals s WITH TH partic icip ipants ants:

  • The person can only benefit from care if we view them as self-governing
slide-54
SLIDE 54

10/25/17 Slide 54

Near future goals for SUMMIT at VFC

  • Group refill clinic
  • Evaluate and implement SBIRT for teens
  • Start group for people affected by AOD (CRAFT)
  • Build more effective working relationships with other

agencies

  • Hub and spoke model
slide-55
SLIDE 55

10/25/17 Slide 55

Ongoing challenges

  • Expanding SUMMIT program across sites
  • Time and capacity for ongoing education around issues of SUD
  • Maintaining clinic workflow while upholding values of harm

reduction

  • How to capture data outside of medical infrastructure

– E.g.: “touches” with case manager; participant-specific goals.

  • Same-day billing
  • Referrals to inpatient, detox and residential.
slide-56
SLIDE 56

10/25/17 Slide 56

Conclusions and Next Steps

slide-57
SLIDE 57

10/25/17 Slide 57

Despite perceptions of multiple barriers, SUD treatment can be successfully implemented in primary care

  • An organizational readiness intervention can help overcome

barriers and change the culture of care to include SUD treatment

  • A CC service delivery intervention can improve linkage to care

and outcomes

  • A specialized workforce, funding support and listening to

patients and providers can help sustain a newly integrated SUD program

slide-58
SLIDE 58

10/25/17 Slide 58

However, the glass is only half full

72% of patients who needed SUD treatment did not get it 28% of patients going to primary care for something

  • ther than an

SUD got SUD treatment!

slide-59
SLIDE 59

10/25/17 Slide 59

Next steps

  • Learn more about what patients need to respond to

screening and initiate SUD treatment in primary care

  • Continue to study SUMMIT data to

– Better understand patient factors that predict use of medication and brief treatment – Better understand provider barriers and facilitators to prescribing medication – Learn about sustainability

  • Continue to share our findings
slide-60
SLIDE 60

10/25/17 Slide 60

Study publications to date

  • 1. Watkins, K.E., Ober, A.J., Lamp, K., Lind, M., Setodji, C.M., Osilla, K.C., Hunter, S.B.,

McCullough, C.M., Becker, K., Iyiewuare, P.O., Diamant, A., Heinzerling, K., & Pincus, H.A. (2017). Collaborative Care for Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders in Community Health Clinics. JAMA Internal Medicine, 8(4).

  • 2. Watkins, K.E., Ober, A.J., Lamp, K., Lind, M., Diamant, A., Osilla, K.C., Heinzerling, K., Hunter,

S.B., & Pincus, H.A. Implementing the chronic care model for opioid and alcohol use disorders in primary care. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and

  • Action. In press.
  • 3. Storholm, E.D, Ober, A.J., Hunter, S.B., Becker, K, & Watkins, K.E. Barriers to integrating the

continuum of care for opioid and alcohol use disorders in primary care: A qualitative longitudinal study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. In press.

  • 4. Iyiewuare, P.O., McCullough, C., Ober, A., Becker, K., Osilla, K., & Watkins, K.E. Demographic

and mental health characteristics of individuals who present to community health clinics with substance misuse. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health. In press.

  • 5. Kulesza, M., Watkins, K.E., Ober, A., Osilla, K., & Ewing, B. Internalized stigma as an

independent risk factor for substance use problems among primary care patients: Rationale and preliminary support. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. In press.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

10/25/17 Slide 61

Study publications to date (continued)

6. Ober, A.J., Watkins, K.E., Hunter, S.B., Ewing, B., Lamp, K., Lind, M., Becker, K., Heinzerling, K., Osilla, K.C., Diamant, A., & Setodji, C.M. Assessing and improving organizational readiness to implement substance use disorder treatment in primary care: Findings from the SUMMIT

  • study. BMC Family Practice. Under review.

7. Ober, A.J., Watkins, K.E., Lamp, K., Lind, M., Osilla, K.C., Heinzerling, K.G., De Vries, D., Iyiewuare, P.O., & Diamant, A. (2017). SUMMIT Study Protocol: Step-by-Step Procedures for Providing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Treatment Services to Primary Care Patients with Opioid or Alcohol Use Disorders. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, TL-219-NIDA. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TL219.html 8. Heinzerling, K.G., Ober, A.J., Lamp, K., De Vries, D., & Watkins, K.E. SUMMIT: Procedures for medication-assisted treatment of alcohol or opioid dependence in primary care. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, TL-148-NIDA, 2016. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TL148.html 9. Osilla, K.C., D’Amico, E.J., Lind, M., Ober, A.J., & Watkins, K.E. Brief treatment for substance use disorders: A guide for behavioral health providers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, TL-147-NIDA, 2016. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TL147.html

  • 10. Ober A.J., Watkins K.E., Hunter S.B., Lamp K., Lind M., & Setodji C.M. (2015). An
  • rganizational readiness intervention and randomized controlled trial to test strategies for

implementing substance use disorder treatment into primary care: SUMMIT study protocol. Implementation Science, 10(66).

slide-62
SLIDE 62

10/25/17 Slide 62

Many people contributed to this project (it takes a village ...)

  • Kate Watkins (PI)
  • All of the staff at Venice

Family Clinic

  • Kirsten Becker
  • Allison Diamant
  • Brett Ewing
  • Keith Heinzerling
  • Sarah Hunter
  • Erik Storholm
  • Praise Iyiewuare
  • Mimi Lind
  • Colleen McCullough
  • Karen Osilla
  • Claude Setodji
  • Chau Pham
  • Tiffany Hruby

Project funded by NIDA R01DA034266 and Alkermes for XR-NTX

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Questions? Karen: klamp@mednet.ucla.org Allison: ober@rand.org Tobin: tdshelton@mednet.ucla.org

slide-64
SLIDE 64

10/25/17 Slide 64

Several factors influenced who received any evidence-based practice

  • Those more likely to receive any evidence based practice ...

– were older (p<.0001) – were stably housed (i.e., not homeless (P<.01) – had more severe SUDs (p<.05) – had greater perceptions of self-stigma around their SUD (p<.05)

slide-65
SLIDE 65

10/25/17 Slide 65

Several factors influenced who received MAT

  • Those more likely to receive MAT among those with an AUD

– were older (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.03, 1.11, p<.05) – had received BT prior to MAT (OR = 3.34, CI = 1.35, 8.91, p<.01)

  • Those more likely to receive MAT among those with an OUD

– were older (OR = 1.06, CI = 1.03, 1.10, p<.01) – male gender (OR = .37, CI = 0.16, 0.85, p<.05) – working full-time (OR = 3.26, CI = 1.14, 9.28, p<.05) – had more negative consequences from substance use (OR = 1.14, CI = 1.02, 1.28, p<.05)