impact of research on middleware technology
play

Impact of Research on Middleware Technology Wolfgang Emmerich, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Impact of Research on Middleware Technology Wolfgang Emmerich, Mikio Aoyama & Joe Sventek About the Impact Project http://www.acm.org/sigsoft/impact History of Science project funded by QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed)


  1. Impact of Research on Middleware Technology Wolfgang Emmerich, Mikio Aoyama & Joe Sventek

  2. About the Impact Project • http://www.acm.org/sigsoft/impact • History of Science project funded by QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. • Aim: document impact that research has had on practice • Areas of investigation: – Software configuration management – Programming languages – Middleware – Assertions – Testing – Software development environments – Design methods – … 2

  3. Impact Middleware Report • Detailed investigation into the research origins of successful middleware technology – Web services – Application Servers – Transaction Monitors – Distributed Object Systems – Message Queues – Remote Procedure Call Systems • We have documented a dozen impact traces (existence proof) • To be published in – ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes in Q4 06 – ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review in Q1 07 – ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology in 07 3

  4. Research Method • Evidence for impact • Impact traces – Market analysis reports [A Vendor, 2006] A Product – Articles in journals & proceedings – PhD Theses [Standards Body, 2004] – Technical Reports Standard – Software – Standards documents – Minutes of standards meetings [Author, 2002] A Paper – Interviews – People movement [Author, 2000] Prototype [Another Author, 1998] PhD Thesis 4

  5. Middleware License Market in 2005 [Gartner 06] 3,500.00 3,159.40 3,000.00 2,657.30 2,500.00 2,000.00 Million US $ 1,500.00 1,232.50 1,000.00 739.4 500.00 397.1 314.4 0.00 IBM BEA Oracle Microsoft Tibco Others 5 Vendor

  6. Impact on Middleware: Overview Web Services Application RPC Distributed TPMs MOMs Middleware Servers Systems Objects [W3C 2-03] [Sun 2001] [Sun 2003] RMI [Sun 2001] JMS SOAP, WSDL EJB & JTA [Waldo 1998] RMI [BEA 1999] [TIBCO 1999] BEA MQ TIB [Birrel&Nelson 1993] [OMG 1994] Network Objects OTS [DEC 1995] FUSE [W3C 1998] [OMG 1991] [Skeen 1992] XML CORBA [Dixon et al 1989] InformationBus Arjuna [IETF 1988] ONC [APM 1989] [Reiss 1987] [ISO 1986] [Dixon 1988] ANSA Field SGML [Birrel&Nelson 1984] Recoverability RPC [Goldfarb 1981] [Moss 1980] [Nelson 1981] Market Segment GML Nested [Lauer 1979] RPC Standard Transactions Mesa Article [Reid 1976] Scribe PhD Thesis [DeRemer&Kron1976] MIL 6

  7. Trace: Simple Object Access Protocol [IBM 2004] [Microsoft 2004] [Apache 2004] [BEA 2004] WebSphere BizTalkServer Axis WebLogicServer [Gudgin et al, 2003] SOAP 1.2 [Box, 2001] Soap History [Box et al, 2001] SOAP 1.1 [Winer, 1999] XML RPC [Bray, 1998] XML [OpenGroup, 1995] [OMG, 1995] DCE & NDR CDR, IIOP, & GIOP [SUN, 1988] [ISO, 1986] XDR & ONC SGML [Reid, 1981] [Goldfarb, 1981] Scribe Document Markup [Jones, 1980 [Reid, 1981] Rigorous SW Engineering Scribe 7

  8. Trace: Web Services Description Language [Eclipse 2006] [Eclipse 2006] WebToolsProject BPEL Designer [Microsoft 2004] [IBM 2004] [BEA 2004] BizTalkServer [Apache 2004] WebSphere WebLogicServer Axis [Chinnici et al, 2004] WSDL 2.0 [Christensen et al, 2001] WSDL 1.1 [Curbera et al, 2000] [Microsoft, 1999] NASSL SDL [Bray et al, 1998] [Microsoft 1995] XML DCOM [Microsoft 1992] MS-RPCs [OMG 1991] CORBA 8

  9. Trace: Business Process Execution Language [IBM 2004] [Microsoft 2004] [Eclipse 2006] [Oracle 2004] [ActiveEndpoints 2004] WebSphere BizTalkServer BPEL Designer BPEL Process Mgr ActiveBPEL [Andrews et al, 2003] BPEL 1.1 [Christensen et al, 2001] [Thatte 2001] WSDL 1.1 XLANG [Bray et al, 1998] [Leyman et al, 1997] XML WSFL [Alonso et al 1995] Advanced Transactions [Hollingsworth 1994] WfMC Reference Model [Leyman & Altenhuber, 1994] FlowMark [Barghouti, 1992] PDSEs 9

  10. Trace: Transactions in Application Servers [Fleury et al 2003] [HP 2001] [BEA 2000] [Sun 2001] JBoss [IBM 2001] Arjuna AS � WebLogicServer iPlanet WebSphere [Arjuna 2000] [Sun, 1999] JTS Arjuna � JTS [BEA 1996] [Arjuna 1998] Tuxedo [OMG, 1994] OTS Arjuna � [OMG, 1994] CORBA OTS CORBA CCS [OMG, 1993] [OMG, 1993] [OMG, 1993] IBM/Tandem Transarc Bull/Iona/Novell Transarc CCS [Gray, 1993] OTS Proposal OTS Proposal Transaction Processing [X/Open, 1991] [ISO, 1992] ODTP XA [Dixon et al, 1989] ISO 10026 Persistent Objects [ISO, 1988] [Dixon, 1988] ISO 9804/05 Object Mgmnt for [Moss, 1981] Recoverability Nested Transactions [Gray, 1978] 10 Database OSs

  11. Trace: Messaging in Application Servers [IBM 2005] [Sonic 2005] [JBoss 2005] [BEA 2005] Websphere MQ Sonic MQ JBoss MQ WebLogicServer [Sun, 2001] JMS [BEA 2000] [Tibco 1999] WebLogicEnterprise TIB [BEA 1999] [OMG, 1999] BEA MessageQ CORBA Notification [DEC 1998] DEC Message Queue [IBM 1995] MQ Series [Teknekron 1995] [Hart et al 1995] Information Bus [OMG, 1994] DEC FUSE [SSI 1994] [IBM 1992] CORBA Events [Oki et al 1993] EzBridge Networking Information Bus [X/Open, 1991] [Skeen 1992] Blueprint ODTP XA Information Bus [Cagan 1990] [Reiss 1990] HP Softbench Message Passing [Rothermel&Mohan 1989] [Birman&Thomas 1989] Aries Replication [Reiss 1987] [Cheriton&Deering 1985] Field 11 Network Multicasts

  12. Trace: Distributed Objects in Application Servers [Sun, 2003] J2SE 1.3 RMI [Waldo 1998] RPC and RMI [Wollrath et al 1996] [OMG, 1995] [Microsoft, 1995] RMI CORBA 2.0 DCOM 1.0 [Birrel et al 1993] [OMG, 1991] Network Objects CORBA 1.0 [Dixon et al 1989] [Bal 1989] Arjuna Shared Objects [Jul et al 1988] [Liskov 1988] Emerald [Bal et al 1988] Arden Orca [Hutchinson 1988] Emerald [Black et al 1987] Emerald [Shapiro et al 1985] [Almes et al 1985] [Birrel&Nelson 1984] SOS Eden Implementing RPC 12

  13. Trace: Distributed Objects in CORBA [OMG 1992] Object Management Architecture [OMG 1991] [Booch 1991] CORBA 1.0 OO Design [Sventek&Andreas 1991] Joint Submission [Atkinson et al 1989] OODB Manifesto [Sventek 1991] HP CORBA Submission [Snyder 1990b] [Snyder 1990a] Draft OMG Object Model Glossary [ANSA 1989] ANSA Reference Manual [Meyer 1988] [Snyder 1986] OO SW Construction Encapsulation & Inheritance [Liskov&Snyder 1979] CLU Exceptions [Liskov et al, 1977] CLU 13

  14. Trace: Remote Procedure Calls [Microsoft, 1995] DCOM [Microsoft, 1992] [ANSA 1989] RPCs [OSF, 1991] ANSA Reference Manual [IETF, 1988] OSF/DCE ONC RPCs [Dineen et al 1987] NCA [Birrel&Nelson 1984] Implementing RPC [Leach et al 1982] UIDs [Liskov 1980] [Nelson 1981] Distributed Systems [Goldberg 1980] RPC Primitives Smalltalk [Lauer et al 1979] Mesa [Liskov 1977] [DeRemer & Kron 1976] [Stroustrup 1977] CLU Module Interconnection Languages C++ [Parnas 1972] Software Module Specification 14

  15. Key findings • Technology Transfer takes time: 15-20 years between first publication of an idea and widespread availability in products • Inter-disciplinarity: Industry does not care about the ACM CS classification • On the importance of PhD students: Almost all impact traces lead back to somebody’s PhD • Technology transfer: Most successful form is people movement • Standardization: Without wide-spread agreements on ideas there is no wide-spread adoption 15

  16. Tech transfer needs time • RPCs: Key ideas of Module Interconnection Languages in mid 70s, basic research on RPC systems in early 80s, release of RPC into Sun and Apollo OS in late 80s, standardization by IETF and OSF in early 90s. • Distributed Transactions: Early research into QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor non-standard transactions in early-mid 80s, are needed to see this picture. standardization in mid 90s at OSF and OMG, wide spread use in application servers in late 90s. • Distributed Objects (RMI): Basic research in mid 80s (Argus, Eden, Emerald), Consolidation in “network objects” in mid 90s, standardization through JCP in late 90s, widespread use in Java and .NET remoting at turn of millenium 16

  17. Interdisciplinarity • Example 1: RPC IDLs • Impact traces frequently – Information Hiding [CACM 15(5), 1972] cross boundaries between – MIL [IEEE TSE SE-2(2), 1976], different CS disciplines. – Mesa [ICSE-4, 1977] • For middleware study: – Cedar RPCs [ACM ToCS (2(1), 1984] – Sun RPC [IETF RFC 1057, 1987] – Software Engineering • Example 2: Transactions – Networking – OS - Gray 1976 – Programming Languages – Nested Transactions, Moss 1981 – Distributed Systems – Concurrency Ctrl Bernstein et al 1987 – Arjuna Dixon, 1989 – Databases – OSF ODTP/XA, 1991 • Impact sometimes larger in – CORBA CCS, OTS 1994 area other than that of first – J2EE JTS, JTA, 2001 publication (e.g. MQs) 17

  18. Traces often lead back to PhDs • RPCs: – Failure semantics & architecture: Nelson, (CMU 1981) – Orphan detection: Panzieri (Newcastle University 1985) • Distributed Transactions: – Nested transactions: Moss (MIT 1981) QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor – Object transactions: Dixon (Newcastle University, are needed to see this picture. 1987) • Object Models for distributed computing: – CORBA object model: Snyder (MIT, 1978) – RMI object model: Bal (Vrije, 1989) & Hutchinson (Washington 1987) • Web services: – Scribe: Reid (CMU, 1981) 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend