IMO 2020: Looking beyond the horizon Sunil Krishnakumar Senior - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

imo 2020 looking beyond the horizon
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

IMO 2020: Looking beyond the horizon Sunil Krishnakumar Senior - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IMO 2020: Looking beyond the horizon Sunil Krishnakumar Senior Technical Advisor About ICS The global trade association for merchant shipowners and operators formed in 1921 First shipowner NGO granted IMO consultative status (1961)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sunil Krishnakumar Senior Technical Advisor

IMO 2020: Looking beyond the horizon

slide-2
SLIDE 2

About ICS

 The global trade association for merchant shipowners and operators formed in 1921  First shipowner NGO granted IMO consultative status (1961)  Membership comprises world’s national shipowner associations, representing all sectors and trades and over 80% of world merchant fleet

slide-3
SLIDE 3

IMO Work on 2020

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ICS Work at IMO

 Proponents of the concept of carriage ban on non-complaint fuels  Vital role in the development of IMO template on ship implementation plans  Substantial contribution to the IMO suite

  • f 2020 guidance

 Proactive participant in discussions related to fuel quality and safety

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ICS Work - Guidelines

 ICS guidance on Preparing for Compliance with the Global Sulphur Cap  Joint industry guidance on supply and use

  • f 0.50% fuel

 Participation in fuel quality and safety initiatives e.g. Amsterdam Rotterdam Antwerp (ARA) fuel quality working group, CIMAC WG7 on fuels etc.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ICS Guidance on Compliance

 For ships choosing to comply using fuel oils with sulphur content of 0.50% m/m or less  Updated to take account of latest IMO decisions  Available free of charge via ICS web site

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Contribution to external work

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Challenges remain

 Global availability of safe & compliant fuel  Consistent and fair verification and enforcement by member States  Maintaining level playing field

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Availability

 Positive signs from major bunkering hubs  Concerns remain about smaller ports  Especially concerning for ships on tramp trades

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Safety

 Incompatibility between different batches of fuels  Very little operational experience

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Safety

 Fuel safety a huge concern  Fuel supply side still largely unregulated

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Verification and enforcement

 Due consideration to ships that have prepared in advance in good faith  Differentiation between accidental and wilful non-compliance  Fuel Oil Non Availability Reports

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Verification and enforcement

➢ Wilful non-compliance = enforcement action ➢ Ships do not have control over sulphur content

  • f fuel as supplied

➢ Documentation is key - Bunker Delivery Note is a statutory document

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Verification and enforcement

Sampling for compliance verification ➢ MARPOL delivered sample ➢ In use sample ➢ On board sample

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Verification and enforcement

MARPOL delivered sample ➢ Previously known as MARPOL Sample ➢ Non-compliance proves supplier’s fault ➢ Should prove which party is responsible for exceedance of the sulphur limit of the ship’s

  • n board and/or in-use fuel oils
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Verification and enforcement

In use sample ➢ the sample of fuel oil the ship is using at the time of sampling ➢ All ships required to have these points ➢ Location is “safety critical” ➢ Non compliant result should be followed up by checking MARPOL delivered sample to confirm responsibility

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Verification and enforcement

On board sample ➢ The sample of fuel oil intended to be used on board that ship ➢ Set up to address enforcement of carriage ban ➢ Storage tanks are not designed for representative sampling ➢ Non compliant result only applicable for fuel at the point of sampling!

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Verification and enforcement

Verification standards – MEPC.1/Circ.882

slide-19
SLIDE 19

ECA compliance

Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on MARPOL Annex VI by Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU ❖ Number of inspections: 4,304 ❖ Detentions related to CIC topic: 7 ❖ Overall CIC-topic detention rate: 0.2%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Level playing field

 Carriage ban on non-complaint fuel  Similar standards for all methods of compliance  Very high premium for non-compliance

slide-21
SLIDE 21

EGCS as a compliance option

➢ Grandfathering ➢ ICS list of ports prohibiting discharge from

  • pen loop scrubbers

➢ Equivalent standards for equivalent systems ➢ Guidance to members on steps to take following EGCS malfunction – MEPC.1/Circ.883

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusions

ICS confident that IMO 2020 will be a success Scale of this “regulatory game changer” not to be underestimated Availability of compliant fuel and consistent and fair enforcement will be key

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sunil Krishnakumar Senior Technical Advisor sunil.krishnakumar@ics-shipping.org www.ics-shipping.org @icsshipping