IETF IPTEL WG 55 th IETF, Atlanta, GA Trunk Group Open Issues - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ietf iptel wg
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

IETF IPTEL WG 55 th IETF, Atlanta, GA Trunk Group Open Issues - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IETF IPTEL WG 55 th IETF, Atlanta, GA Trunk Group Open Issues <draft-ietf-iptel-trunk-group-00> Vijay Gurbani, Cullen Jennings, and Jon Peterson Presented by: Vijay Gurbani 55 Tue, Nov 19, 2002 1 SPIRITS WG vkg Issues Issue 1:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tue, Nov 19, 2002

55

SPIRITS WG 1

vkg

IETF IPTEL WG

55th IETF, Atlanta, GA Trunk Group Open Issues <draft-ietf-iptel-trunk-group-00> Vijay Gurbani, Cullen Jennings, and Jon Peterson Presented by: Vijay Gurbani

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tue, Nov 19, 2002

55

SPIRITS WG 2

vkg

Issues

  • Issue 1: “sip” URI or “tel” URI?

– Defining them as extensions to the “tel” URI appears reasonable (since trunks are tied to the PSTN, anyway). – Easy to derive a SIP URI from the tel URI.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Tue, Nov 19, 2002

55

SPIRITS WG 3

vkg

Issues

  • Issue 2: Global or local namespace?

– Most trunk groups will be locally scoped; however, for the sake of flexibility, a naming convention has been proposed in the I-D which is flexible enough to accommodate both. – ABNF has been proposed in the I-D for this purpose, resulting in a URI which may look like:

  • tel:+14085551212;tgrp=local=tg55/3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tue, Nov 19, 2002

55

SPIRITS WG 4

vkg

Issues

  • Issue 3: Originating and destination trunk groups

should be able to appear separately and concurrently in the SIP message.

– Originating trunk group: Contact header – Destination trunk group: R-URI

  • Other options:

– Originating trunk group: From header (abstract identifier that persists even after the session is completed – probably not a good choice). – Destination trunk group: To header (same reservation as above, plus, proxies make routing decisions based on R-URIs).

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Tue, Nov 19, 2002

55

SPIRITS WG 5

vkg

Issues

  • Issue 4: SIP intermediaries should be able to

add the destination trunk group to SIP requests as a route is selected for the session.

– Argues more in favor of using R-URI.