identification and isotropy characterization of deformed
play

Identification and isotropy characterization of deformed random - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Identification and isotropy characterization of deformed random fields through excursion sets Julie Fournier Les probabilit es de demain - 11 May 2017 Work supervised by Anne Estrade MAP5, universit e Paris Descartes The model of


  1. Identification and isotropy characterization of deformed random fields through excursion sets Julie Fournier Les probabilit´ es de demain - 11 May 2017 Work supervised by Anne Estrade MAP5, universit´ e Paris Descartes

  2. The model of deformed random fields. Let X : R 2 → R be a stationary and isotropic random field : for any translation τ , for any rotation ρ in R 2 , law law X ◦ τ = X and X ◦ ρ = X . We write C ( t ) = Cov ( X ( t ) , X (0)) its covariance function. We call X the underlying field . let θ : R 2 → R 2 be a bijective, bicontinuous, deterministic application satisfying θ (0) = 0, which we will call a deformation . X θ = X ◦ θ : R 2 → R is the deformed random field constructed with the underlying field X and the deformation θ . Two types of questions : Invariance properties of the deformed field Inverse problem: identification of θ thanks to (partial) observations of X θ . J. Fournier Deformed random fields 2 / 20

  3. First observation: the invariance properties are not preserved in general. Level sets of a realization of a Gaussian Level sets of a realization of X θ constructed stationary and isotropic random field X with with θ : ( s , t ) �→ ( s 0 . 6 , t 1 . 4 ) and with the Gaussian covariance C ( x ) = exp( −� x � 2 ). underlying field X . Question Which are the deformations that preserve stationarity and isotropy ? J. Fournier Deformed random fields 3 / 20

  4. References Spatial statistics (Sampson and Guttorp, 1992). Image analysis : ”shape from texture” issue (Clerc-Mallat, 2002). Numerous domains of application in physics: for instance, used in cosmology for the modelization of the CMB and mass reconstruction in the universe. Also studied by Caba˜ na, 1987,Perrin-Meiring, 1999; Perrin-Senoussi, 2000, etc.. J. Fournier Deformed random fields 4 / 20

  5. Cases of isotropy (in law) Our assumptions The underlying field X must satisfy the following assumptions : � X is stationary and isotropic, (H) X is centered and admits a second moment . The deformation θ belongs to the set D 0 ( R 2 ) = { θ : R 2 → R 2 / θ is continous and bijective, with a continuous inverse, such that θ (0) = 0 } J. Fournier Deformed random fields 5 / 20

  6. Cases of isotropy Problem Which are the deformations θ such that for any underlying random field X , X θ is isotropic ? Example : elements of SO(2) : rotations of R 2 . Another problem : Which are the deformations θ such that for a fixed underlying random field X , X θ is isotropic ? For the proof. Invariance of the covariance function of X θ under rotations : ∀ ρ ∈ SO (2) , ∀ ( x , y ) ∈ ( R 2 ) 2 , Cov ( X θ ( ρ ( x )) , X θ ( ρ ( y ))) = Cov ( X θ ( x ) , X θ ( y )) C ( θ ( ρ ( x )) − θ ( ρ ( y ))) = C ( θ ( x ) − θ ( y )) Chose the covariance function C ( x ) = exp( −� x � 2 ) to obtain ∀ ρ ∈ SO (2) , ∀ ( x , y ) ∈ ( R 2 ) 2 , � θ ( ρ ( x )) − θ ( ρ ( y )) � = � θ ( x ) − θ ( y ) � . Polar representation of θ . J. Fournier Deformed random fields 6 / 20

  7. Cases of isotropy Answer to the problem Spiral deformations are the deformations preserving isotropy for any underlying field X . Notations : ˆ θ polar representation of θ : ˆ ( r , ϕ ) �→ (ˆ θ 1 ( r , ϕ ) , ˆ θ : (0 , + ∞ ) × Z / 2 π Z → (0 , + ∞ ) × Z / 2 π Z θ 2 ( r , ϕ )). Definition A deformation θ ∈ D 0 ( R 2 ) is a spiral deformation if there exist f : (0 , + ∞ ) → (0 , + ∞ ) strictly increasing and surjective, g : (0 , + ∞ ) → Z / 2 π Z and ε ∈ {± 1 } such that θ satisfies ˆ ∀ ( r , ϕ ) ∈ (0 , + ∞ ) × Z / 2 π Z , θ ( r , ϕ ) = ( f ( r ) , g ( r ) + εϕ ) . J. Fournier Deformed random fields 7 / 20

  8. Simulations of fields deformed with spiral deformations Level sets of a realization of X θ , with θ a Level sets of a realization of X θ , with a deformation with polar representation θ : ( r , ϕ ) �→ ( √ r , r + ϕ ) and X Gaussian deformation θ : x �→ � x � x and X ˆ Gaussian with Gaussian covariance. with Gaussian covariance. J. Fournier Deformed random fields 8 / 20

  9. Excursion sets Let u ∈ R be a fixed level, A u ( X θ , T ) = { t ∈ T / X θ ( t ) ≥ u } let T be a rectangle or a segment in R 2 , let A u ( X θ , T ) be the excursion set of X θ restricted to T above level u : Level sets and excursion sets of a realization of X θ , with θ : ( s , t ) �→ ( s 0 . 6 , t ) defined on (0 , + ∞ ) 2 and X Gaussian with Gaussian covariance. J. Fournier Deformed random fields 9 / 20

  10. Euler characteristic χ of excursion sets Euler characteristic: integer-valued and additive functional defined on a large class of compact sets. Heuristic definition for a compact set G ⊂ R 2 of dimension 1 or 2 d = 1, χ ( G ) = #(disjoint components in G); d = 2, χ ( G ) = #(connected components in G) − #(holes in G) . The Euler characteristic is a homotopy invariant, hence A u ( X θ , T ) = θ − 1 ( A u ( X , θ ( T )) ⇒ χ ( A u ( X θ , T )) = χ ( A u ( X , θ ( T ))) . and we can use an expectation formula proven for stationary and isotropic random fields in Adler-Taylor, 2007. J. Fournier Deformed random fields 10 / 20

  11. Additional assumptions  X is Gaussian ,    X is stationary and isotropic,     X is almost surely of class C 2 , (H’)  X is centered, C (0) = 1 and C ′′ (0) = − I 2 ,      a non-degeneracy assumption on X ( t ) , for every t ∈ R 2 .  The deformation θ belongs to the set D 2 ( R 2 ) = { θ : R 2 → R 2 / θ of class C 2 and bijective, with an inverse of class C 2 , such that θ (0) = 0 } J. Fournier Deformed random fields 11 / 20

  12. Formulas for the expectation of E [ χ ( A u ( X θ , T ))] • If T is a segment in R 2 , writing | θ ( T ) | 1 the one-dimensional Hausdorff measure of θ ( T ), E [ χ ( A u ( X θ , T ))] = e − u 2 / 2 | θ ( T ) | 1 + Ψ( u ) , 2 π where Ψ( u ) = P ( Y > u ) for Y ∼ N (0 , 1). • If T ⊂ R 2 is a rectangle, writing | θ ( T ) | 2 the two-dimensional Hausdorff measure of θ ( T ), � u | θ ( T ) | 2 (2 π ) 3 / 2 + | ∂θ ( T ) | 1 � E [ χ ( A u ( X θ , T ))] = e − u 2 / 2 + Ψ( u ) , 4 π where ∂ G is the frontier of G . J. Fournier Deformed random fields 12 / 20

  13. Writing θ = ( θ 1 , θ 2 ) the coordinate functions of θ , let J θ ( s , t ) be the Jacobian matrix of θ at point ( s , t ) ∈ R 2 : � ∂θ 1 ∂θ 1 � ∂ s ( s , t ) ∂ t ( s , t ) � J 1 J 2 θ ( s , t ) � J θ ( s , t ) = = θ ( s , t ) . ∂θ 2 ∂θ 2 ∂ s ( s , t ) ∂ t ( s , t ) Note that the Jacobian determinant is either positive on R 2 or negative on R 2 . � s � t • | θ ([0 , s ] × [0 , t ]) | 2 = 0 | det( J θ ( x , y )) | dx dy 0 � s � s ∂ x θ 1 ( x , t ) 2 + ∂ x θ 2 ( x , t ) 2 dx = � 0 � J 1 • | θ ([0 , s ] × { t } ) | 1 = θ ( x , t ) � dx 0 � t � t ∂ y θ 1 ( s , y ) 2 + ∂ y θ 2 ( s , y ) 2 dy = � 0 � J 2 • | θ ( { s } × [0 , t ]) | 1 = θ ( s , y ) � dy . 0 Consequence : general idea Condition / information on E [ χ ( A u ( X , θ ( T )))] (T rectangle or segment) implies condition / information on the Jacobian matrix of θ , hence on θ . J. Fournier Deformed random fields 13 / 20

  14. A weak notion of isotropy linked to excursion sets Let X be an underlying field satisfying (H’) . Definition ( χ -isotropic deformation) A deformation θ ∈ D 2 ( R 2 ) is χ -isotropic if for any rectangle T in R 2 , for any u ∈ R and for any ρ ∈ SO (2) , E [ χ ( A u ( X θ , ρ ( T ))] = E [ χ ( A u ( X θ , T )] . First observation : θ spiral deformation ⇒ θ χ -isotropic deformation Therefore, if θ χ -isotropic, X θ can be considered as weakly isotropic . Definition depending on the underlying field X . Aim : Prove that ⇒ θ χ -isotropic deformation θ spiral deformation. J. Fournier Deformed random fields 14 / 20

  15. First characterization The χ -isotropic condition is also true for T segment. Formulas for E [ χ ( A u ( X θ , T )] involve J θ , formulas for E [ χ ( A u ( X θ , ρ ( T ))] involve J θ ◦ ρ . Lemma 1 A deformation θ ∈ D 2 ( R 2 ) is χ -isotropic if and only if for any ρ ∈ SO (2), for any x ∈ R 2 , � ∀ k ∈ { 1 , 2 } , � J k θ ◦ ρ ( x ) � = � J k ( i ) θ ( x ) � , ( ii ) det( J θ ◦ ρ ( x )) = det( J θ ( x )) . J. Fournier Deformed random fields 15 / 20

  16. Second characterization and conclusion of the proof A translation of the first lemma in polar coordinates brings: Lemma 2 A deformation θ ∈ D 2 ( R 2 ) is a χ -isotropic deformation if and only if functions θ 1 ( r , ϕ )) 2 + (ˆ  ( r , ϕ ) �→ ( ∂ r ˆ θ 1 ( r , ϕ ) ∂ r ˆ θ 2 ( r , ϕ )) 2    θ 1 ( r , ϕ )) 2 + (ˆ ( r , ϕ ) �→ ( ∂ ϕ ˆ θ 1 ( r , ϕ ) ∂ ϕ ˆ θ 2 ( r , ϕ )) 2  ( r , ϕ ) �→ ˆ  θ 1 ( r , ϕ ) det( J ˆ θ ( r , ϕ ))  are radial, i.e. if they do not depend on ϕ . This differential system is solved in Briant, Fournier (2017, submitted) and the set of solutions is exactly the set of spiral deformations . J. Fournier Deformed random fields 16 / 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend