q deformed whittaker functions and the local langlands
play

q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 1 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands


  1. q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 1 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  2. References 1 S. Oblezin, On parabolic Whittaker functions I & II , Lett. Math. Phys. 101 & Cent. Eur. J. Math. 10 (2012); 2 A. Gerasimov, D. Lebedev, S. Oblezin Baxter operator formalism for Macdonald polynomials , [math.AG/1204.0926] ; 3 A. Gerasimov, D. Lebedev, S. Oblezin On a classical limit of q-deformed Whittaker functions , Lett. Math. Phys., 100 (2012); 4 A. Gerasimov, D. Lebedev, S. Oblezin Parabolic Whittaker functions and Topological field theories I , Commun. Number Theory Phys. 5 (2011); 5 A. Gerasimov, D. Lebedev, S. Oblezin On q-deformed Whittaker function I, II & III , Commun. Math. Phys 294 (2010) & Lett. Math. Phys 97 (2011); 6 A. Gerasimov, D. Lebedev, S. Oblezin Baxter operator and Archimedean Hecke algebra , Commun. Math. Phys. 284 (2008) . March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 2 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  3. Whittaker functions The Gauss (Bruhat) decomposition of G = G ( F ): � e x 1 , . . . , e x N � G 0 = U − · A · U + , A = . Character of B − = U − A with λ = ( λ 1 , . . . , λ N ) ∈ C N : � N → C ∗ , e ( λ i + ρ i ) x i . χ λ : B − − χ λ ( ua ) = i =1 The principal series representation ( π λ , V λ ) of G and of U ( g ): � � � � G B − χ λ = f ∈ Fun ( G ) � f ( bg ) = χ λ ( b ) f ( g ) , b ∈ B − Ind The Whittaker function Ψ λ ( g ) is a smooth function on X = N − \ G analytic in λ given by Ψ λ ( g ) = e ρ ( g ) � � ψ L , π λ ( e − H ( g ) ) ψ R , (1) ψ L , ψ R ∈ V λ are defined by character ψ 0 : F → C ∗ : � � � → C , ψ : U − ψ ( u ) = u α i ψ 0 . simple roots March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 3 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  4. Spherical Whittaker functions The Iwasawa decomposition of G = G ( F ): G = K · A · U + . The spherical Whittaker function Ψ λ ( z ) is a smooth function on H = K \ G analytic in λ given by Ψ λ ( g ) = e ρ ( g ) � � ψ K , π λ ( e − H ( g ) ) ψ R , (2) with the spherical vector ψ K ∈ V λ . March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 4 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  5. Quantum Toda lattice In the real case, G = G ( R ), generators C r , r = 1 , . . . , N of the center ZU ( g ) define quantum Toda Hamiltonians: H r · Ψ λ ( x ) := e − ρ ( x ) � � ψ K , π λ ( C r e − H ( x ) ) ψ R . (3) The G ( R )-Whittaker function is an eigenfunction: H r · Ψ λ ( x ) = σ r ( λ ) Ψ λ ( x ) , (4) σ r ( λ ) are r -symmetric functions in λ = ( λ 1 , . . . , λ N ). Example In the case G = GL (2; R ) � ∂ � H 2 = − � 2 � ∂ 2 � + ∂ 2 + ∂ + e x 1 − x 2 , H 1 = − � , ∂ x 2 ∂ x 2 ∂ x 1 ∂ x 2 1 2 March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 5 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  6. Example: the GL (2; R )-Whittaker functions � � e x 1 − T + e T − x 2 � ı � λ 2 ( x 1 + x 2 − T )+ ı � λ 1 T − 1 Ψ R λ 1 , λ 2 ( e x 1 , e x 2 ) = dT e (5) � R � 2 � λ 1+ λ 2 x 1+ x 2 x 1 − x 2 = e e K λ 1 − λ 2 � e . 2 2 2 � The Mellin-Barnes integral representation: � � λ i − γ � 2 � λ i − γ � x 2 ( λ 1 + λ 2 − γ )+ ı ı Ψ R λ 1 , λ 2 ( e x 1 , e x 2 ) = � x 1 γ � � Γ d γ e (6) � i =1 R − ıǫ Both integral representations can be generalized to GL ( N ; R ) by induction over the rank N , using the Baxter Q -operator formalism, [GLO]. March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 6 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  7. Baxter operators for spherical Whittaker functions, [GLO] One-parameter family of K -biinvariant functions Q s in the Hecke algebra: � � � dh Q s ( gh − 1 ) Ψ λ ( h ) = L p ( s ; V ) Ψ λ ( g ) . Q s ∗ Ψ λ ( g ) = G Theorem The L-function is the spherical transform of the Baxter operator kernel � L p ( s ; V ⊗ δ − 1 / 2 ) = da Q s ( a − 1 ) ϕ λ ( a ) , A with spherical function given by � dk e � H ( kg ) , λ � . ϕ λ ( g ) = K Example In the case G = GL (1; F ) : � λ − s � 1 λ − s � Γ L p ( s ; V ) = L ∞ ( s ; V ) = h 1 − p λ − s , . � March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 7 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  8. Explicit formulas: non-Archimedean case Let ξ λ : H ( G , K ) → C and σ λ ⊂ GL ( N ; C ) is the (semisimple) conjugacy class, attached to ξ λ via Satake correspondence. The class-one GL ( N ; F ) -Whittaker function associated with ξ λ : 1 Ψ λ ( ug ) = ψ ( u ) Ψ λ ( ug ) ; 2 � dh Ψ λ ( gh ) φ ( h − 1 ) = ξ λ ( φ ) Ψ λ ( g ) for any φ ∈ H ( G , K ) ; G 3 Ψ λ (1) = 1 . The Langlands-Shintani (LS) formula The class-one GL ( N ; Q p ) -Whittaker function reads  � p λ 1 �   p − ̺ ( n ) ch V n ... , n = ( n 1 ≥ . . . ≥ n N ) Ψ Q p λ ( p n ) = (7)  p λ N  0 , n non-dominant March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 8 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  9. � � � � � � � � � � Explicit formulas: Archimedean case The Givental stationary phase integral formula: � � dx nk e � − 1 F λ ( x nk ) , N ( N − 1) N ( N − 1) Ψ R C ∼ R ⊂ C λ ( x ) = , (8) 2 2 k ≤ n < N C � n − 1 � � N � n � � e target ( a ) − source ( a ) F λ ( x nk ) = ıλ n x n , k − x n − 1 , i − arrows n =1 k =1 i =1 x N , 1 x N , 2 . . . x NN (9) . ... . . . . . x 21 x 22 x 11 March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 9 / Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence 17

  10. Baxter operators for Macdonald polynomials, [GLO] � ∨ ∨ ∨ Q q , t Q x ( µ, Λ) = x | µ |−| Λ | ϕ µ/ Λ , · f (Λ) = Q x ( µ, Λ) f ( µ ) , (10) x µ ∈ Z N � t j − i q µ i − µ j +1 � � t j − i q Λ i − Λ j +1 +1 � N � Γ q , tq − 1 t j − i q µ i − Λ j +1 � Γ q , tq − 1 ϕ µ/ Λ = � � t j − i q Λ i − µ j +1 +1 � , Γ q , tq − 1 Γ q , tq − 1 i , j =1 i ≤ j � � � ( tz ) 1 / 2 ; q 1 − tzq n Γ q , t ( z ) × Γ q , t − 1 ( qz − 1 ) = t 1 / 2 θ 1 � � Γ q , t ( z ) = 1 − zq n , . z 1 / 2 ; q θ 1 n ≥ 0 Theorem The Macdonald polynomials are eigenfunctions under the action of (10): N � ∨ Q q , t · P Λ ( z ) = L ∨ L ∨ x ( z ) P Λ ( z ) , x ( z ) = Γ q , t ( xz i ) . (11) x i =1 March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 10 Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence / 17

  11. � � � q -deformed Whittaker functions Ψ R λ ( a ) t → 0 q → 1 P q , t � Ψ q Λ ( z ) z (Λ) q → 0 t → + ∞ z = p λ Ψ Q p λ ( a ) H r · Ψ q z (Λ) = e r ( x ) Ψ q z (Λ) . (12) r � � � � 1 − q Λ ik − Λ ik +1 +1 � 1 − δ ik +1 − ik , 1 T I r , H r = T I r = T q , q Λ i , I r k =1 i ∈ I r Example In the case GL (2; F ) : � 1 − q Λ 1 − Λ 2 +1 � H 1 = T 1 + T 2 , H 2 = T 1 T 2 March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 11 Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence / 17

  12. Explicit formulas: q -analog of the LS formula, [GLO] n − 1 � ( p n , i − p n , i +1 ) q ! � � N z | p n |−| p n − 1 | i =1 Ψ q z ( p N ) = (13) � n ( p n , i − p n − 1 , i ) q ! ( p n − 1 , i − p n , i +1 ) q ! GZ n =1 i =1 ( m ) q ! := (1 − q ) · . . . · (1 − q m ) ; when p N = ( p N , 1 ≥ . . . ≥ p NN ), and Ψ q z ( p N ) = 0 otherwise. Summation is over the Gelfand-Zetlin (GZ) patterns: p N , 1 p N , 2 p NN . . . ... p n +1 , k ≥ p nk ≥ p n +1 , k +1 , . . . 1 ≤ k ≤ n < N p 21 p 22 p 11 “ U q ( gl N )-Whittaker function” is a character of Demazure module of � gl N : � ∆ q ( λ ) − 1 ch V w ( p ′ ) , p = ( p 1 ≥ . . . ≥ p N ) Ψ q λ ( p ) = (14) 0 , p non-dominant March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 12 Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence / 17

  13. Archimedean limit q → 1, [GLO] � � q = e − ε , ε − 1 log ε m ε = − Lemma � � ε − 1 y + α m ε Let f α ( y ; ε ) := q ! , then as ε → +0 � e A ( ε ) + e − y + O ( ε ) , A ( ε ) = − π 2 α = 1 6 − 1 2 ln ε f α ( y ; ε ) ∼ , 2 π . e A ( ε ) + O ( ε α − 1 ) , α > 1 Theorem Set p n , k = ( n + 1 − 2 k ) m ε + x n , k z n = e ı ε Λ n , , 1 ≤ n ≤ k ≤ N , ε then for the general partition p N : � � N ( N − 1) ( N − 1)( N +2) A ( ε ) Ψ q Ψ Givental ( x N ) = lim e z ( p N ) (15) ε . 2 2 λ ǫ → +0 March 7, 2013 ICERM (Providence) 13 Sergey OBLEZIN , ITEP q -deformed Whittaker functions and the local Langlands correspondence / 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend