i nteresting but

play

I NTERESTING , BUT ... We have not answered questions on TKE and U b - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 12, 2024 •141 likes •826 views

N EAR - WALL ENSTROPHY GENERATION IN A DRAG - REDUCED TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW WITH SPANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS Pierre Ricco 1 , Claudio Ottonelli, Yosuke Hasegawa, Maurizio Quadrio 1 Sheffield, 2 Onera Paris, 3 Tokyo, 4 Politecnico Milano

N EAR - WALL ENSTROPHY GENERATION IN A DRAG - REDUCED TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW WITH SPANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS Pierre Ricco 1 , Claudio Ottonelli, Yosuke Hasegawa, Maurizio Quadrio 1 Sheffield, 2 Onera Paris, 3 Tokyo, 4 Politecnico Milano ERCOFTAC/PLASMAERO Workshop, Toulouse, 10 December 2012 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 1-28
T URBULENT DRAG REDUCTION A CTIVE OPEN - LOOP TECHNIQUE Energy input into system Pre-determined forcing N UMERICAL APPROACH Direct numerical simulations of wall turbulence Fully-developed turbulent channel flow ( Re τ = u τ h /ν = 200) Compact finite-difference scheme along wall-normal direction Spectral discretization along streamwise and spanwise directions S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS New approach: Turbulent enstrophy Transient evolution C ONSTANT DP / DX τ w is fixed in fully-developed conditions GAIN: U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 2-28
T URBULENT DRAG REDUCTION A CTIVE OPEN - LOOP TECHNIQUE Energy input into system Pre-determined forcing N UMERICAL APPROACH Direct numerical simulations of wall turbulence Fully-developed turbulent channel flow ( Re τ = u τ h /ν = 200) Compact finite-difference scheme along wall-normal direction Spectral discretization along streamwise and spanwise directions S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS New approach: Turbulent enstrophy Transient evolution C ONSTANT DP / DX τ w is fixed in fully-developed conditions GAIN: U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 2-28
T URBULENT DRAG REDUCTION A CTIVE OPEN - LOOP TECHNIQUE Energy input into system Pre-determined forcing N UMERICAL APPROACH Direct numerical simulations of wall turbulence Fully-developed turbulent channel flow ( Re τ = u τ h /ν = 200) Compact finite-difference scheme along wall-normal direction Spectral discretization along streamwise and spanwise directions S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS New approach: Turbulent enstrophy Transient evolution C ONSTANT DP / DX τ w is fixed in fully-developed conditions GAIN: U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 2-28
T URBULENT DRAG REDUCTION A CTIVE OPEN - LOOP TECHNIQUE Energy input into system Pre-determined forcing N UMERICAL APPROACH Direct numerical simulations of wall turbulence Fully-developed turbulent channel flow ( Re τ = u τ h /ν = 200) Compact finite-difference scheme along wall-normal direction Spectral discretization along streamwise and spanwise directions S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS New approach: Turbulent enstrophy Transient evolution C ONSTANT DP / DX τ w is fixed in fully-developed conditions GAIN: U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 2-28
T URBULENT DRAG REDUCTION A CTIVE OPEN - LOOP TECHNIQUE Energy input into system Pre-determined forcing N UMERICAL APPROACH Direct numerical simulations of wall turbulence Fully-developed turbulent channel flow ( Re τ = u τ h /ν = 200) Compact finite-difference scheme along wall-normal direction Spectral discretization along streamwise and spanwise directions S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS New approach: Turbulent enstrophy Transient evolution C ONSTANT DP / DX τ w is fixed in fully-developed conditions GAIN: U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 2-28
S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS G EOMETRY Ww = A sin � T t � Lz 2 π Ly y x Lx Mean flow z U 2 b , o − U 2 C f , r − C f , o R = b , r C f , r = U 2 b , o Why does the skin-friction coefficent decrease? C f = 2 τ w / ( ρ U 2 b ) decreases → study why U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 3-28
S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS G EOMETRY Ww = A sin � T t � Lz 2 π Ly y x Lx Mean flow z U 2 b , o − U 2 C f , r − C f , o R = b , r C f , r = U 2 b , o Why does the skin-friction coefficent decrease? C f = 2 τ w / ( ρ U 2 b ) decreases → study why U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 3-28
S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS G EOMETRY Ww = A sin � T t � Lz 2 π Ly y x Lx Mean flow z U 2 b , o − U 2 C f , r − C f , o R = b , r C f , r = U 2 b , o Why does the skin-friction coefficent decrease? C f = 2 τ w / ( ρ U 2 b ) decreases → study why U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 3-28
S PANWISE WALL OSCILLATIONS G EOMETRY Ww = A sin � T t � Lz 2 π Ly y x Lx Mean flow z U 2 b , o − U 2 C f , r − C f , o R = b , r C f , r = U 2 b , o Why does the skin-friction coefficent decrease? C f = 2 τ w / ( ρ U 2 b ) decreases → study why U b increases 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 3-28
A VERAGING OPERATORS S PACE : HOMOGENEOUS DIRECTIONS � L x � L z 1 f ( y , t ) = f ( x , y , z , t ) d z d x L x L z 0 0 P HASE N − 1 � f ( y , τ ) = 1 � f ( y , nT + τ ) N n = 0 T IME � T � f � ( y ) = 1 f ( y , τ ) d τ T 0 G LOBAL � h [ f ] g = � f � ( y ) d y 0 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 4-28
A VERAGING OPERATORS S PACE : HOMOGENEOUS DIRECTIONS � L x � L z 1 f ( y , t ) = f ( x , y , z , t ) d z d x L x L z 0 0 P HASE N − 1 � f ( y , τ ) = 1 � f ( y , nT + τ ) N n = 0 T IME � T � f � ( y ) = 1 f ( y , τ ) d τ T 0 G LOBAL � h [ f ] g = � f � ( y ) d y 0 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 4-28
A VERAGING OPERATORS S PACE : HOMOGENEOUS DIRECTIONS � L x � L z 1 f ( y , t ) = f ( x , y , z , t ) d z d x L x L z 0 0 P HASE N − 1 � f ( y , τ ) = 1 � f ( y , nT + τ ) N n = 0 T IME � T � f � ( y ) = 1 f ( y , τ ) d τ T 0 G LOBAL � h [ f ] g = � f � ( y ) d y 0 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 4-28
A VERAGING OPERATORS S PACE : HOMOGENEOUS DIRECTIONS � L x � L z 1 f ( y , t ) = f ( x , y , z , t ) d z d x L x L z 0 0 P HASE N − 1 � f ( y , τ ) = 1 � f ( y , nT + τ ) N n = 0 T IME � T � f � ( y ) = 1 f ( y , τ ) d τ T 0 G LOBAL � h [ f ] g = � f � ( y ) d y 0 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 4-28
A VERAGING OPERATORS S PACE : HOMOGENEOUS DIRECTIONS � L x � L z 1 f ( y , t ) = f ( x , y , z , t ) d z d x L x L z 0 0 P HASE N − 1 � f ( y , τ ) = 1 � f ( y , nT + τ ) N n = 0 T IME � T � f � ( y ) = 1 f ( y , τ ) d τ T 0 G LOBAL � h [ f ] g = � f � ( y ) d y 0 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 4-28
M EAN FLOW 25 0.35 0.3 20 0.25 15 U � 0.2 �� R 0.15 10 0.1 5 0.05 0 0 0 1 2 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 10 10 10 y T Scaling by viscous units Mean velocity increases in the bulk of the channel Mean wall-shear stress is unchanged Optimum period of oscillation T ≈ 75 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 5-28
M EAN FLOW 25 0.35 0.3 20 0.25 15 U � 0.2 �� R 0.15 10 0.1 5 0.05 0 0 0 1 2 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 10 10 10 y T Scaling by viscous units Mean velocity increases in the bulk of the channel Mean wall-shear stress is unchanged Optimum period of oscillation T ≈ 75 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 5-28
M EAN FLOW 25 0.35 0.3 20 0.25 15 U � 0.2 �� R 0.15 10 0.1 5 0.05 0 0 0 1 2 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 10 10 10 y T Scaling by viscous units Mean velocity increases in the bulk of the channel Mean wall-shear stress is unchanged Optimum period of oscillation T ≈ 75 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 5-28
M EAN FLOW 25 0.35 0.3 20 0.25 15 U � 0.2 �� R 0.15 10 0.1 5 0.05 0 0 0 1 2 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 10 10 10 y T Scaling by viscous units Mean velocity increases in the bulk of the channel Mean wall-shear stress is unchanged Optimum period of oscillation T ≈ 75 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 5-28
M EAN FLOW 25 0.35 0.3 20 0.25 15 U � 0.2 �� R 0.15 10 0.1 5 0.05 0 0 0 1 2 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 10 10 10 y T Scaling by viscous units Mean velocity increases in the bulk of the channel Mean wall-shear stress is unchanged Optimum period of oscillation T ≈ 75 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 5-28
T URBULENCE STATISTICS 0.2 uv � 7 , �� φ = 3 π 0.15 4 6 � 0.1 φ = π w 2 5 � 2 0.05 � 4 , � vw � 0 3 � v 2 � -0.05 φ = 0 2 , � -0.1 φ = π u 2 � 1 4 � -0.15 0 -1 -0.2 0 1 2 0 1 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 y y Turbulence kinetic energy decreases Streamwise velocity fluctuations are attenuated the most vw in created, �� vw � New oscillatory Reynolds stress term � = 0 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 6-28
T URBULENCE STATISTICS 0.2 uv � 7 , �� φ = 3 π 0.15 4 6 � 0.1 φ = π w 2 5 � 2 0.05 � 4 , � vw � 0 3 � v 2 � -0.05 φ = 0 2 , � -0.1 φ = π u 2 � 1 4 � -0.15 0 -1 -0.2 0 1 2 0 1 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 y y Turbulence kinetic energy decreases Streamwise velocity fluctuations are attenuated the most vw in created, �� vw � New oscillatory Reynolds stress term � = 0 5 D ECEMBER 2012 WALL - OSCILLATION DRAG - REDUCTION PROBLEM 6-28

Download Presentation

Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

More recommend