I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis Project Update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

i 26 fixed guideway alternatives analysis project update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis Project Update - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis Project Update Charleston Area Transportation Study (CHATS) Policy Committee Meeting Monday, November 16, 2015 @ 10:00 AM Spring 2015 www.i26ALT.org CHATS Update November 2015 Agenda Project


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Spring 2015 www.i26ALT.org

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis Project Update

Charleston Area Transportation Study (CHATS) Policy Committee Meeting

Monday, November 16, 2015 @ 10:00 AM November 2015 CHATS Update

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.i26ALT.org

Agenda

Project Update Screen Two Alternatives Analysis FTA Project Readiness Next Steps

CHATS Update November 2015

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.i26ALT.org

Project Partners

CHATS Update November 2015

slide-4
SLIDE 4

www.i26ALT.org

Project Overview: Purpose & Goals

CHATS Update

The purpose of the I-26 Alternatives Analysis is to

improve transit service and enhance regional mobility along the 22-mile I-26 Corridor connecting

Summerville, North Charleston, and Charleston.

Goal 1: Improve Mobility, Safety, Accessibility and Connectivity of the Transit System and Region Goal 2: Provide a Cost Effective and Financially Feasible Transit Alternative Goal 3: Support Local Land Use Objectives Goal 4: Plan for Projected Growth in an Environmentally Sustainable Manner Goal 5: Respond to Community Needs and Support Goal 6: Support a Diverse Regional Economy

November 2015

slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.i26ALT.org

Study Process: Pre-Project Development

CHATS Update

Comprehensive Operational Analysis In Depth Analysis of Current Transit Network over Next 20 Years Locally Preferred Alternative + 20-Year Transit Plan for I-26 Corridor Federal Transit Administration Capital Investment Program (Federal Process) 6-10 – Years (Typical) Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis of I-26 Corridor Alternatives Analysis for I-26 Corridor for Commuter Bus or Fixed Guideway Transit (BRT, LRT, Commuter Rail, etc.)

Pre-Project Development (Local Planning Process) October 2014 – December 2015

Public Involvement Surveys, Public Outreach, Public Meetings, Project Website, Quarterly Newsletter, Facebook & Twitter Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Coordination Following Guidelines for Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grant Program

November 2015

slide-6
SLIDE 6

www.i26ALT.org

Project Update: Pre-Screen Alternatives (October 2014 – March 2015)

CHATS Update November 2015

slide-7
SLIDE 7

www.i26ALT.org

Project Update: Screen One Alternatives Analysis (April - August 2015)

CHATS Update November 2015

Bus Rapid Transit

  • System of buses that operate like a

conventional rail in reserved guideways or mixed traffic.

Light Rail Transit

  • Short passenger rail cars on fixed rails in right-
  • f-way that is separated from other traffic or

mixed with traffic, powered electrically from an

  • verhead electric line.

Hybrid Rail

  • Urban passenger train service operated as light

rail or commuter rail service using electric or diesel self-propelled passenger cars. (EMU/DMU)

Commuter Rail

  • Urban passenger train service consisting of

local, short distance travel between a central city and adjacent suburbs using electric or diesel locomotive hauled passenger cars.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.i26ALT.org

Screen Two Alternatives Analysis (Underway)

CHATS Update

Alternatives Recommended to Move Forward to Screen Two

Alternative A: No Build – Commuter Bus on I-26

Alternative B-1/B-2: US 78/US 52/Meeting– BRTLRT

Alternative B-3/B-4: US 78/US 52/East Bay – BRT/LRT

Alternative C-1/C-2: US 176/US 52/Meeting – BRT/LRT

Alternative C-3/C-4: US 176/US 52/East Bay – BRT/LRT

Alternative D-1/D-2: Dorchester Rd/US 52/Meeting – BRT/LRT

Alternative D-3/D-4: Dorchester Rd /US 52/East Bay – BRT/LRT

November 2015

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.i26ALT.org

Screen Two Alternatives Analysis

CHATS Update

 Refining the Alternatives

 Ridership Forecasting

 Using FTA’s Simplified Simplified-Trips-on-

Projects Software (STOPS)

 Guideway Analysis

 Mixed Traffic versus Dedicated Guideway  Center Median or Side Lanes  Neck Area Constraints – King, Meeting,

Other ROW

 Peak Hour Bus Lanes to MUSC

 Station Location Analysis

 Downtown Summerville or Azalea Square  North Charleston Transit Hub  DT Charleston Transit Hub November 2015

Healthline BRT Cleveland, OH METRO LRT, Phoenix, AZ

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.i26ALT.org

Screen Two Alternatives Analysis

CHATS Update

 Refining the Alternatives

 Short-Term Phasing Options

 Identify 1st Phase – Core “Trunkline” for

Fully Dedicated Fixed Guideway

 “Transitway” enhancements

 Peak Hour Bus Lanes  Limited Stop Service  Transit Signal Priority & Technology to

improve Transit Travel Time

 Bus on Shoulder Lanes

 Capital and Operating Cost Estimates  Develop Transit Feeder Service

November 2015

slide-11
SLIDE 11

www.i26ALT.org

Screen Two Funding & Project Readiness FTA Capital Investment Grant Program

New Starts Small Starts

CHATS Update

 Total Project Cost: Greater

than $250M

 CIG Program Funds:

Greater than $75M

 3 Phase Process

 Project Development  Engineering  Construction

 New Fixed guideway  BRT in separated ROW  Total Project Capital Cost:

$250M or Less

 CIG Program Funds: $75M

  • r Less

 2-Phase Process

 Project Development  Construction

 Simplified financial

evaluation

 New fixed guideway  Corridor Based BRT (Not

separated ROW)

November 2015

slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.i26ALT.org

Screen Two Funding & Project Readiness FTA Capital Investment Grant Process

CHATS Update

  • 1. Project Development

Complete NEPA and related environmental laws

Select Locally Preferred Alternative

Adopt LPA in Fiscally Constrained LRTP

Obtain Medium Project Rating under Project Justification Evaluation

Obtain commitment of 30% of matching funds*

Complete 30% design and engineering

Must complete these steps within 2-years

  • 2. Engineering

Commitment of 50% of matching funds

Significant progress with engineering within 3-Years

  • 3. Recommendation for Construction Grant Agreement

Evaluation Rating

Availability of CIG program funds

Project readiness

November 2015

* Small Starts have 3-Years in Project Development to gain 50% of funding commitment, there is no “Engineering” phase.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

www.i26ALT.org

Screen Two Funding & Project Readiness FTA CIG Project Justification Criteria

CHATS Update

 Screening Criteria Based on FTA Project Justification

Criteria (50%)

 Local Financial Commitment during Project Development

(50%)

 Reasonableness of assumptions (50%)  Commitment of Capital and Operating Funds (25%)  Current Transit Capital and Operating Conditions (25%)

 Average Fleet Age (Under 8 Years for Medium Rating)  Bond Ratings over last 2 Years/Current Ratio (Assets to Liabilities)  Recent Service History for Medium Ranking

 Historical Positive Cash Flow/No Cash Flow Shortfalls  Only Minor Service Adjustments in Recent Years

November 2015

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.i26ALT.org

Next Steps

 Screen Two Alternatives Analysis using Funding & Project Readiness

Criteria: September- November 2015

 Select Locally Preferred Alternative: December 2015

 Technical Advisory Committee/Steering Committee Meeting

 Complete CARTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis: December 2015  Final Project Plan: January 2016  Upcoming Meetings

 Stakeholder Meetings: Ongoing  Technical Advisory/Steering Committee Meeting: Mid-December 2015  Public Meetings: January 2016 CHATS Update November 2015

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Spring 2015 www.i26ALT.org

J in the Conversation!

Visit us on the web: www.i26ALT.org Email us: info@i26ALT.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

i26alt.mindmixer.com

CHATS Update November 2015

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Spring 2015 www.i26ALT.org

CARTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis Update

Charleston Area Transportation Study (CHATS) Policy Committee Meeting

Monday, November 16, 2015 @ 10:00 AM November 2015 CHATS Update

slide-17
SLIDE 17

www.i26ALT.org

CARTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis

CHATS Update

 System and route evaluation to

develop short and mid-range transit service recommendations.

 CARTA Transit System

 16 Fixed Routes & Neighborhood

Circulators

 4 Express Routes to North

Charleston, Summerville, West Ashley, Mt. Pleasant, & James Island

 3 Downtown Area Shuttle (DASH)

Trolley Routes

 Operates 62 vehicles during peak

service

November 2015

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.i26ALT.org

CARTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis

CHATS Update November 2015

 CARTA fixed route service caries

  • appx. 16,000 customers per day

 In 2014, CARTA reached 5 million

riders

 52% of all trips occur on one of 4

routes:

 Route 10 Rivers Ave. (24%)  Route 211 Meeting/King Trolley

(12%)

 Route 12 Upper Dorchester (8%)  Route 11 Airport/Dorchester (8%)

 Most Active Stops:

 North Charleston SuperStop (Rivers

& Cosgrove)

 Mary Street Parking Garage

(Meeting & Mary)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

www.i26ALT.org

CARTA System Analysis: Ridership Characteristics

CHATS Update

 Transit Dependent Ridership

 54% Female  65% Black/African American  58% annual income $30,000 or

less

 48% under Age 35  75% did not have a car

available for their trip

 42% travel between home and

work

 50% pay cash fare

November 2015

Service Area Households with No Vehicle

slide-20
SLIDE 20

www.i26ALT.org

CARTA System Analysis: Transit Supportive Areas within ¼ Mile of CARTA Route

CHATS Update

 2013 Population Served by CARTA

 ¾ Mile CARTA Service Area:

236,649

 2013 Urbanized Area: 567,077

(41.7%)

 Transit Supportive Areas

3 Households and/or 4 Jobs per Acre

November 2015

Land Area (Acres) % of Area Served Households Jobs Tri-County Region 1,361,976 249,569 307,809 CARTA Service Coverage Area (1/4 Mile Walk Radius) 31,468 2% 51,360 125,030 Total Tri-County Area Transit Supportive Area 19,243 1.4% 38,162 142,835 Transit Supportive Area Served by CARTA (1/4 Mile Walk Radius) 11,370 59% 27,622 98,367 Transit Supportive Area Served by CARTA (1/4 Mile Walk Radius) 2010

slide-21
SLIDE 21

www.i26ALT.org

CARTA Short Range Plan Strategy

How can CARTA optimize the current system to focus existing resources on improving service to current transit markets and set aside revenues for future vehicle and technology investment?

CHATS Update

 Short-Range Challenges &

Opportunities

 Average vehicle fleet age is 13 Years  Increased traffic congestion =

 longer headways and travel times  inconvenient transfer times  poor on-time performance

 Ridership is flat  Limited Capacity at Major Transfer

Hubs: North Charleston SuperStop & Mary Street Parking Garage

November 2015

slide-22
SLIDE 22

www.i26ALT.org

CARTA Mid-Range Plan Strategy

CHATS Update

 How should the system be

designed in the mid-term to:

 Better serve existing and

future transit markets

 Improve transit

“convenience” to attract “choice” riders

 Incorporate i-26ALT

recommendations

November 2015

slide-23
SLIDE 23

www.i26ALT.org

Next Steps

 Meet with CARTA Route Advisory Committee/Board on Short Range

Recommendations

 Develop Mid-Range Recommendations as part of i-26ALT Locally Preferred

Alternative (December 2015)

 Present recommendations for public input (January 2016)  Implement short range plan (Beginning Summer 2016)

CHATS Update November 2015

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Spring 2015 www.i26ALT.org

J in the Conversation!

Visit us on the web: www.i26ALT.org Email us: info@i26ALT.org Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

i26alt.mindmixer.com

CHATS Update November 2015