Hydrogen towards deep decarbonization Emre Gener June 3 rd , 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hydrogen towards deep decarbonization
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hydrogen towards deep decarbonization Emre Gener June 3 rd , 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MITEI Spring Symposium Cambridge, MA Hydrogen towards deep decarbonization Emre Gener June 3 rd , 2019 Though the hydrogen economy concept is not new, the motivation of resurgence changes over time 2004 1874 2015 1970 1999 Hydrogen


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MITEI Spring Symposium – Cambridge, MA

Emre Gençer

June 3rd, 2019

Hydrogen towards deep decarbonization

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Hydrogen for economy-wide deep decarbonization

2

Though the hydrogen economy concept is not new, the motivation of resurgence changes over time…

Sources: EIA, 2018

1870 2020 2000 2010 1990 1970 1970 2004 1874 2015

Increase energy security Reduce environmental impacts “water will be the coal

  • f the future”

First hydrogen economy term Solar cogeneration of hydrogen and electricity

1999

Energy Transportation Transportation and distributed electricity Food-Energy-Water Hard to decarbonize

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Low-carbon electricity pivotal for economy-wide deep decarbonization, but other energy carriers like hydrogen may be necessary

Sources: EIA, 2018

Fossil or Bio with CCS Electrolysis Fossil or Bio with CCS Variable Renewables (wind, solar) Low Carbon Electric Power Low Carbon Hydrogen Dispatchable low-carbon power (e.g. Nuclear, Hydro)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

The exact integration of hydrogen into the energy system is uncertain but numerous opportunities exist both on the supply and demand side

Sources: MITEI

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Not all hydrogen are created equal – The role of hydrogen in economy-wide deep decarbonization is dependent on how hydrogen is produced

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Currently, H2 mainly consumed by industry with co-located, centralized H2 production to minimize delivery costs – NG reforming is predominant supply source, little other infrastructure

H2 supply (total = 8 EJ)1

1. IRENA, Hydrogen From Renewable Power Technology Outlook for the energy transition, 2018; 2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: https://flowcharts.llnl.gov/

  • 3. H2 storage capacity estimated by mulitiplying storage capacity of a single storage facility (Chevron Terminal, TX) with number of facilities operating in U.S. (5)
  • 4. U.S. EIA: https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_stor_cap_dcu_nus_a.htm
  • 5. U.S. Drive Hydrogen Delivery Technical Team Roadmap, 2017, 6. U.S., Department of Energy, energy.gov

Demand

65 25 10 0% 50% 100% Other industry Refining Chemicals

Supply – demand picture Scale of H2 infrastructure vs. other energy infrastructure

Reference: U.S. Primary Energy consumption in 2018: 106.7 EJ2 Hydrogen Other energy sources Storage (GJ)3,4 ~106 NG: ~1010 Pipelines (miles)5 1600 NG: 300,000 Petroleum: 130,000 # of refueling stations6 39 168,000

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Transportation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The global fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) car stock reached 8 000 units in April 2018. The United States represents the largest fleet with 4 500 FCEV

8 Total FCEV fleet

Toyota Mirai ($57,500) Fuel Economy = 106 km/kg H2 Tank ~ 5 kg Range = 550 km (340 miles)

Japan has more than twice as many fueling stations relative to the US (100 vs. 38)

Sources: EIA, 2019

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Exploring the life cycle greenhouse emissions of various hydrogen pathways relative to vehicle types

Sources: EIA, 2018

  • Car models chosen to facilitate apples-apples comparisons—i.e., minimize differences in non-

powertrain features. Interior volume (ft3): 115 115 117 116 113 Toyota Camry ICEV Toyota Camry HEV Honda Clarity PHEV Honda Clarity BEV Honda Clarity FCEV

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

FCEV GHGs with Hydrogen via Different Methods

Sources: MITEI Analysis I. Miller and E.Gençer, SESAME model

  • 1. Electrolysis w/ wind is cleanest.
  • 2. Compared to SMR, electrolysis w

avg grid does not have carbon benefits for FCEVs, even with ~50% drop in grid carbon from 2018 to 2050.

  • 3. Adding carbon capture to SMR

reduces FCEV emissions to similar level as BEVs.

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 2018 2026 2034 2042 2050 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx emissions per distance (gCO₂e / mi) ICEV HEV BEV FCEV - electrolysis FCEV - SMR FCEV - SMR & CC FCEV - electrolysis w/ wind power

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Power sector

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Moving from marginal to meaningful levels of renewable power generation necessitates long term and large scale energy storage to account for seasonal and year-to-year variabilities

12

Sources: MITEI Analysis B.Clinton and E.Gençer, SESAME model, California Generation Data

slide-13
SLIDE 13

In California natural gas combined cycle plants increasingly dynamic role in balancing the power system

– This paradigm increases marginal emission levels and will be a technical challenge for CCS integration

13

Sources: MITEI Analysis B.Clinton and E.Gençer, California Energy Commission, EPA CEMS data

In-state hydropower generation: 36,920 GWh in 2017 24,410 GWh in 2016

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Decoupling power generation and carbon capture to overcome low capacity factor and operational variations – Centralized SMR with CCS can fuel the existing natural gas fleet

14

Sources: MITEI Analysis SESAME model

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Hydrogen value chain should be significantly scaled-up to have an impact in the current energy system – 2018 H2 production ~10 Mtons (1.2 EJ) vs. 2018 energy demand ~101.2 Quad (106.8 EJ)

Sources: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2018

Hydrogen Generation ?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

The primary sector for hydrogen demand will be determined by regional dynamics

Sources: Map-EIA 2018

Hydrogen Generation ?

Heating Industry Energy storage & Transportation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Takeaways

  • Meaningful climate change mitigation efforts must target all sectors, not just power – the versatility of

H2 makes it an appealing energy carrier to serve traditionally difficult-to-electrify end uses.

  • For light duty transportation (FCEV), hydrogen production determine the ranking among other
  • ptions. FCEV GHGs ~quadruple with H2 from coal gasification vs. electrolysis + wind.
  • Due to growth of renewable power, there is a growing need for long-term/seasonal energy storage.

For hydrogen to fill this gap;

  • Cost and performance for production, storage, and power generation options.
  • Decoupling hydrogen production and power generation to use hydrogen as an energy carrier.
  • Infrastructure requirements.
  • The primary role of hydrogen in different regions is likely to be different.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Backup

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Hydrogen is not a primary energy source

Sources: EIA, 2018

Transportation Residential & Commercial Industrial Electric Power 40.4 EJ 29.9 EJ 12.3 EJ 24.3 EJ 12.3 EJ 24.3 EJ 2 EJ y Total: 4178 TWh (15 EJ) NG: 1468 TWh (5.3 EJ) Coal: 1146 TWh (4.1 EJ)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Chemical energy storage steps

20

Production Storage Conversion Transport

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Hydrogen is not a primary energy source

Sources: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2018

Hydrogen Generation ?