How Processors are Embracing U.S. Dairy Traceability Protocols - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how processors are embracing u s dairy traceability
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How Processors are Embracing U.S. Dairy Traceability Protocols - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How Processors are Embracing U.S. Dairy Traceability Protocols Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy Traceability Project Edith Wilkin, Staff VP and Fellow, Food Safety and Regulatory Compliance Leprino Foods Co. Dairy Practices Council Annual


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How Processors are Embracing U.S. Dairy Traceability Protocols

Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy Traceability Project

Edith Wilkin, Staff VP and Fellow, Food Safety and Regulatory Compliance Leprino Foods Co.

Dairy Practices Council Annual Conference

  • Nov. 8, 2013
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Funded by the dairy farmer checkoff Forum for industry to address pre-competitive barriers, opportunities to foster innovation and sales Commissioned globalization studies in 2009, 2011 conducted by Bain & Co.

Innovation Center background

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Spinach Recall

3

  • E. Coli
  • 5 deaths
  • $350 million

in lost sales

2006-07

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tomato Recall

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Enter Washington…

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A Choice for Dairy Industry

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Industry-led Effort

7

TRACEABILITY SUBCOMMITTEE

Dermot Carey Chairman Jeff Acker Barney Krueger Clay Detlefsen Edith Wilkin Jeremy Travis Goal

Ensure U.S. industry meets legislation, while meeting needs of global buyers and competition

Deliverable

Recommended voluntary, enhanced practices

Metric

Degree of voluntary industry adoption to preempt FSMA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 8 8

Research Findings

Research analyzed by the Innovation Center task group showed that the U.S. Dairy industry:

  • Lacked lot-specific information
  • Failed to provide consistent information

throughout the supply chain

  • Did not meet FDA documentation requirements

Source: 2007 DMI Vulnerabilities Audit Report, 2009 OIG Report Traceability in the Food Supply Chain

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Global Competitors Gaining

9

For example, Oceania’s traceability practices exceeded the U.S. in: Use of technology Government standards External communications

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

3 Pillars of U.S. Dairy Traceability

  • 1. Modeling

physical plants

  • 2. Creating lot-

identifying mark

  • 3. Enhancing

record keeping

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Pilot program involved six processing companies, representing 30 percent

  • f U.S. milk production

Feedback and comments shaped final protocols, released Sept. 10 Participants:

Pilot Study Tested Our Protocols

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Helpful measuring stick

“Comprehensive, straightforward and helpful."

— Helena Soedjak, senior director of quality assurance and compliance

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Fresh Perspective

“Created more awareness of the impact of the various unit processes involved.”

— Dermot Carey, senior vice president, ingredients division

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

New Insights

“Led us to evaluate milk receipts, where we gained clarity on recall responsibility with our vendors.”

— Scott Hall, corporate quality manager

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Do Your Own Gap Analysis

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Receiving

  • Farms on each load can be identified

by receiving record or shipper.

  • For cream, condensed sugars and
  • thers the Lot Identifying Mark ties to

shipper’s records.

  • Loads are recorded with silo

destinations.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17 17

Warehouse

  • Lot Identifying Marks recorded when

received matches shipper’s records.

  • Lot Identifying Marks recorded is

same as is used by all operators at time of process use.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18 18

Process Areas

  • KDEs – Lot Entry Points are identified and listed.
  • Lot Identifying Marks are being recorded as

ingredients are added.

  • Critical Tracking Events are identified and listed.
  • Critical Tracking Events
  • (Example: Silos, Tanks, Mixers) are not filled

and emptied at the same time.

  • Critical Tracking Events are documented.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19 19

Clean-in-Place (CIP)

  • CIP type designated for Critical

Tracking Event equipment. (Full, Sanitize)

  • CIP occurs on raw silos before

refilling.

  • CIP resets Critical Tracking Event lot

when complete.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20 20

Final Products

  • Product Lot Identity clearly identifies

manufacturing lot.

  • Lot Identity is human readable, and

electronically readable to the customer.

  • Lot Identifying Marks are recorded

for packaging materials.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21 21

Records

  • Critical Tracking Event listings are current.
  • KDE – Lot Entry Point records are current.
  • Final products can be linked to Lot

Identifying Marks they contain.

  • Lot Identifying Marks recorded are

consistent throughout the facility.

  • Common points of convergence in

products (Lot Identifying Marks) can be identified.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

If You Don’t Know the Gap is There, How Can You Fix it?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Companies That Have Signed Commitment

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Our Ambitious, but Attainable, 2014 Goal

Commitment Level of

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Window for Industry Action

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

6 Business Reasons to Embrace Enhanced Dairy Traceability

How does this help your business?

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27 27

What You Can Do Next

  • 1. Take the 21-point checklist

back to your plant

  • 2. Conduct a gap analysis
  • 3. Urge your company to sign the U.S. Dairy

Traceability Letter of Commitment

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

www.dairytraceability.com For More Information Vikki Nicholson U.S. Dairy Export Council Staff & Traceability Subcommittee Innovation Center vnicholson@usdec.org

Resources for Information and questions

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Thank You

dairytraceability.com