Historically Forward Thinking April 8, 2013 Historically Forward - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Historically Forward Thinking April 8, 2013

Historically Forward Thinking

• County ED Mission
• Economic Diversification
• Competitive Posture
• ED Goals, Strategies & Time Frames

Historically Forward Thinking

• Department formed in 1994 as a result of the

Naval Base closure.

• Three-fold mission:

– Recruiting new business – Growing existing industry – Improving the Charleston business climate

Historically Forward Thinking

• Departmental Roles

– Recruitment w/ Charleston Regional Development Alliance – BRE (unilateral role) – Business climate (unilateral role)

Historically Forward Thinking

– Marketing and recruitment – Retention and expansion – Tourism – Entrepreneurs/small business – Manufacturing – Technology development – Workforce development – Business climate/education – Preservation of Military presence – Promotion of exports

Allied ED organizations – “It takes a village”

Historically Forward Thinking

• Charleston County as Value Proposition for

Business

– Fiscal integrity/excellence in public services – Public safety – Transportation – Quality of life

Historically Forward Thinking

• Public Safety

– Sheriff/EMS/Awendaw Fire Dept. – Consolidated Dispatch (9-1-1) – Emergency Preparedness

Officials Celebrate Completion of Charleston County’s Consolidated 9-1-1 Center and Emergency Operations Center on 1/24/13 in Palmetto Commerce Parkway (North Charleston).

Historically Forward Thinking

• Transportation

infrastructure

– RoadWise – BCDCOG Transportation planning – CARTA funding – workforce mobility

Historically Forward Thinking

• Quality of Life

– Places

• Planning, GreenBelts,

Recycling, Building Dept., Public Works/Mosquito Control

– People

• Libraries, DAODAS,

Court System, BCDCOG (Workforce Development)

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

• ED Performance – Recruitment success

– 1994-2012 Charleston County witnessed the creation of 24,000 Jobs and $4.2 billion in capital investment. – In 2012, over $162.1 million in capital investment and 950 jobs were announced. – Ranks in the top 10 state wide for the 16th time in the last 18 years.

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

• From 2011-2012

– Home sales up along with sales price – New single family and multi-family starts – Manufacturing, retail, construction gained jobs – Port volume up – Flight volume up – Retail sales up – Unemployment rate decreased – Visitor industry robust

Historically Forward Thinking

• For 2013-2014

– Home sales continue to improve – Building starts continue – Port activity continues to increase – Flight activity up again – Retail sales increase again – Unemployment down to 5.9% by end of 2014 – Visitor industry metrics positive

Boeing 787 Final Assembly Southwest Airlines Space & Naval Warfare Systems Clemson Wind Turbine Facility City of Charleston Horizon Project Jet Blue Airlines

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

• Business Advantages

– Port of Charleston – Expanded Air Service – Comparative Business Cost Advantages – Productive workforce / “best of class” training programs – Pro-business state and local governments – Quality of life

Historically Forward Thinking ACCRA Cost of Living Index

Austin, TX 95.6 Charleston, SC 98.4 Charlotte, NC 94.7 Everett, WA 111.9 Greenville, SC 93.1 Jacksonville, FL 96.7 Knoxville, TN 89.3 Lexington, KY 90.2 New York, NY 225.3 Raleigh, NC 90.8 Richmond, VA 102.1 San Diego, CA 131.8 Savannah, GA 91.0 Washington, DC 144.7

Historically Forward Thinking

• Opportunity Next
• Accelerate Charleston
• Our Region, Our Plan

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking

• Top 10 Best Performing U.S.

metros for high tech & economic growth - Milken Institute, 2012

• Charleston ranks #9 for job

recovery amongst U.S. metros - Brookings Institution, 2012

• Charleston MSA named in

the top 10 best-performing cities - The Milken Institute, 2012

• Charleston is the #1 tourist

city in the world - Conde Nast, 2012

• Top U.S. City with the

Cleanest Air - Honeywell AirGenius, 2012

• Ranked second in the

nation’s ‘Top States for Doing Business’. - Area Development, 2012

• #2 for overall business

environment and overall labor climate in the nation - Area Development, 2012

• A top 10 best place for jobs

in the U.S. (among mid- sized metros) - Forbes, 2012

• #2 for economic growth

(South Atlantic area) - Area Development, 2012

• South Carolina ranks in the

Top 10 Best Places for Business - ChiefExecutive.net, 2012

• Top 10 U.S. Destinations on

the rise for 2012 - TripAdvisor.com, 2012

• #1 in the U.S. for Growth in

Manufacturing Jobs - The Brookings Institution, 2012 (Q1 2010 to Q4 2011)

Historically Forward Thinking

• Support further diversification of the Charleston economy through the continued efforts of

the Charleston County Economic Development Department and its allies.

• Support enhancement of the Charleston business climate.
• Support the safeguarding and improvement of the Charleston quality of life.
• Support the implementation of Opportunity Next.
• Support the implementation of Accelerate Charleston talent development, business climate

and job creation initiatives.

• Support the education initiatives included in Our Region, Our Plan.
• Support the ongoing initiatives of key allies.

– tourism promotion, entrepreneurship, small business, manufacturing, technology, education, workforce development and business climate improvement

Historically Forward Thinking

Historically Forward Thinking…

Historically Forward Thinking

C HA R LESTO N C O UN TY P LA N N IN G C O M M ISSIO N M EETIN G A P R IL 8 , 2 0 1 3

2013 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW

LAND USE ELEMENT REVIEW

• Ur

ban Gr

• wth Boundar

y (UGB) Re vie w

• Ba c kg ro und a nd o ve rvie w
• Re vie w o f pro po se d UGB a me ndme nts a nd re la te d future

la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns

• Additional F

utur e L and Use Re c omme ndations

• Spe c ia l Ma na g e me nt c o mmunitie s
• Rura l Are a c o mmunitie s
• Pa rks, Re c re a tio n, a nd Ope n Spa c e a re a s
• Annua l Wo rk Pro g ra m

URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY REVIEW

2013 PLAN 5-YEAR REVIEW: GOALS FOR THE UGB

• Ge ne ra l c le a n up
• F
• llo w g e o g ra phic fe a ture s tha t pro vide b a rrie rs to

furthe r e xpa nsio n o f the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a , whe re a ppro pria te

• Co nsiste nt lo c a tio n b e twe e n a ll jurisdic tio ns, to the

ma ximum e xte nt po ssib le

• Re sults in a Rura l Are a ne t g a in o f a ppro x. 527 a c re s

(o utside o f land within appro ve d de ve lo pme nt ag re e me nts)

Inte r gove r nme ntal agr e e me nts r e gar ding the loc ation of the UGB and r e quir e me nts to c hange its loc ation

URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY (UGB): GROWTH MANAGEMENT TOOL

• De line a te s the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a

fro m the Rura l Are a

• Pro mo te s hig he r inte nsity g ro wth in the

Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a whe re infra struc ture a nd se rvic e s e xist a nd pre se rve s the c ha ra c te r o f the Rura l Are a

Map 3.1.2: Gr

• wth Manage me nt Ar

e as

DEFINITIONS

• Rur

al Ar e a:

• L
• w le ve l o f infra struc ture a nd se rvic e s;
• L
• w inte nsity de ve lo pme nt (1 Du/ Ac a nd lo we r); a nd
• L

a ndsc a pe do mina te d b y fo re sts, tida l ma rshe s a nd fre shwa te r we tla nds

• Ur

ban/ Subur ban Ar e a:

• Hig h le ve l o f infra struc ture a nd se rvic e s;
• Me dium to hig h inte nsity de ve lo pme nt (3 Du/ Ac to 12

Du/ Ac ); a nd

• Dive rse mix o f re side ntia l ne ig hb o rho o ds a nd o ffic e ,

c o mme rc ia l, a nd industria l use s

Map 3.1.2: Gr

• wth Manage me nt Ar

e as

COUNTY UGB HISTORY

• 1999 Plan: Ado pte d a s the Rura l/ Sub urb a n Are a

E dg e

• 2003 Plan 5- Ye ar

Re vie w: Mo ve d fro m Bro wnswo o d

Ro a d to Ma in Ro a d a nd in the Plo wg ro und Ro a d a re a

• 2004 Plan Ame ndme nt: Applic a tio n to mo ve the

UGB b a c k to Bro wnswo o d Ro a d a re a a ppro ve d

• 2008 Plan 10- Ye ar

Update : Ado pte d a s the UGB

• Re c o g nize d a s a UGB b y the pub lic , munic ipa litie s, a nd
• the r se rvic e pro vide rs

MUNICIPAL URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARIES

• City of Nor

th Char le ston:

• Ha s no t fo rma lly a do pte d a UGB
• T

he Co unty UGB e nc o mpa sse s a ll o f the City o f No rth Cha rle sto n (Cha rle sto n Co unty po rtio n)

• City of Char

le ston:

• Orig ina lly a do pte d a UGB in the Ce ntury V Pla n in 2000
• Upda te d in 2011
• T
• wn of Mount Ple asant:
• Orig ina lly a do pte d a UGB in the ir 1998/ 1999 Pla n
• L
• c a tio n wa s re a ffirme d in the 2003 a nd 2009 Pla ns

2013 PLAN 5-YEAR REVIEW: GOALS FOR THE UGB

• Ge ne ra l c le a n up
• F
• llo w g e o g ra phic fe a ture s tha t pro vide b a rrie rs to

furthe r e xpa nsio n o f the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a , whe re a ppro pria te

• Co nsiste nt lo c a tio n b e twe e n a ll jurisdic tio ns, to the

ma ximum e xte nt po ssib le

Inte rg ove rnme nta l a g re e me nts re g a rding the loc a tion of the UGB a nd re quire me nts to c ha ng e its loc a tion

UGB REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS

INC LUD ING RELA TED FUTURE LA ND USE ( FLU) REC O M M ENDA TIO NS

1 2 3 4 & 5 6 & 7 8 9 10 11

TODAY’S GOALS…

• Re vie w o f e a c h o f the pro po se d UGB a lig nme nts

a nd a ny re la te d future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns

• T

e xt de sc riptio n

• Ma p
• Pla nning Co mmissio n c o nse nsus
• Re sults in a Rur

al Ar e a ne t gain o f a ppro x. 527 ac r e s

(o utside o f land within appro ve d de ve lo pme nt ag re e me nts)

AREA 1: ASHLEY RIVER ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to pla c e the Dra yto n Ha ll

Pla nta tio n pro pe rtie s in the Rura l Are a

• All pro pe rtie s a re lo c a te d in the City o f Cha rle sto n
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

AREA 1: ASHLEY RIVER ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

City of Char le ston: Dr ayton Hall City of Nor th Char le ston

AREA 1: ASHLEY RIVER ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to pla c e the Dra yto n Ha ll

Pla nta tio n pro pe rtie s in the Rura l Are a

• All pro pe rtie s a re lo c a te d in the City o f Cha rle sto n
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

Consensus?

AREA 2: LONG SAVANNAH UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to :
• Pla c e the Co unty Pa rks a nd Re c re a tio n Pro pe rty in the Rura l

Are a ; a nd

• Pla c e the a ppro ve d L
• ng Sa va nna h de ve lo pme nt (City o f

Cha rle sto n) in the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a

• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

AREA 2: LONG SAVANNAH UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

L

• ng Savannah Pr
• pe r

ty City of Char le ston PRC Pr

• pe r

ty

AREA 2: LONG SAVANNAH UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to :
• Pla c e the Co unty Pa rks a nd Re c re a tio n Pro pe rty in the Rura l

Are a ; a nd

• Pla c e the a ppro ve d L
• ng Sa va nna h de ve lo pme nt (City o f

Cha rle sto n) in the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a

• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

Consensus?

AREA 3: BEAR SWAMP ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to :
• Alig n with pa rc e l b o unda rie s; a nd
• Pla c e the Co unty Pa rks a nd Re c re a tio n Bulo w pro pe rtie s

a nd Cha rle sto n Atla ntic Pre sb yte ria n Churc h pro pe rty in the Rura l Are a

• E

ntire a re a is uninc o rpo ra te d

• Diffe rs slig htly fro m the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB

AREA 3: BEAR SWAMP ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

City of Char le ston Par k Char le ston County Bulow Par k

AREA 3: BEAR SWAMP ROAD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Cha ng e the future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns fo r

the Co unty PRC pro pe rtie s to Pa rks, Re c re a tio n, a nd Ope n Spa c e

• T

his ne w F L U de sig na tio n will b e disc usse d in furthe r de ta il la te r in the pre se nta tio n

• Cha ng e the future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n fo r

the c hurc h pro pe rty to Civic / I nstitutio na l

• Add a Civic / I

nstitutio na l de sig na tio n to the Co mpre he nsive Pla n te xt fo r the Rura l Are a

AREA 3: BEAR SWAMP ROAD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

Pr

• pose d UGB

Change F L U to Par ks, Re c r e ation, and Ope n Spac e Change F L U to Civic / Institutional

AREA 3: BEAR SWAMP ROAD UGB & FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to :
• Pla c e the Co unty Pa rks a nd Re c re a tio n Pro pe rty in the Rura l

Are a ; a nd

• Pla c e the a ppro ve d L
• ng Sa va nna h de ve lo pme nt (City o f

Cha rle sto n) in the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a

• F

uture la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns:

• Cha ng e the F

L U fo r the Co unty PRC pro pe rtie s to Pa rks, Re c re a tio n, a nd Ope n Spa c e

• Cha ng e the F

L U fo r the c hurc h pro pe rty to Civic / I nstitutio na l a nd a dd this de sig na tio n to the Pla n fo r the Rura l Are a

Consensus?

AREA 4: BROWNSWOOD ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w the pro pe rty

b o unda rie s c lo se st to the wa te r fe a ture

• Co nta ins ma ny sma ll, pre vio usly sub divide d pa rc e ls
• Ma jo rity o f the a re a is uninc o rpo ra te d
• Diffe rs fro m the lo c a tio n o f the City o f Cha rle sto n

UGB

• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s a t

this time

AREA 4: BROWNSWOOD ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 4: BROWNSWOOD ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 4: BROWNSWOOD ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w the pro pe rty

b o unda rie s c lo se st to the wa te r fe a ture

• Ma jo rity o f the a re a is uninc o rpo ra te d
• Diffe rs fro m the lo c a tio n o f the City o f Cha rle sto n

UGB

• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s a t

this time

Consensus?

AREA 5: BROWNSWOOD/MAIN ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to b e c o nsiste nt with zo ning

a nd future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns in the a re a

• All pa rc e ls a re uninc o rpo ra te d
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

AREA 5: BROWNSWOOD/MAIN ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 5: BROWNSWOOD/MAIN ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to b e c o nsiste nt with zo ning

a nd future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns in the a re a

• All pa rc e ls a re uninc o rpo ra te d
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

Consensus?

AREA 6: SHELL ISLAND TRACE UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to b e c o nsiste nt with a re a

zo ning :

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the R-4 (sub urb a n) zo ning distric t in the

Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a ; a nd

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the RR-3 (rura l) zo ning distric t in the

Rura l Are a

• Are a is e ntire ly uninc o rpo ra te d
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB

AREA 6: SHELL ISLAND TRACE UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

City of Char le ston

AREA 6: SHELL ISLAND TRACE FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Ame nd the future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns fo r

the pa rc e ls tha t wo uld b e pla c e d in the Rura l Are a if the UGB is a djuste d

• Co nsiste nt with the c urre nt RR-3 (rura l) zo ning distric t a nd

the ne w lo c a tio n in the Rura l Are a

• Co rre c ts the c urre nt disc re pa nc y b e twe e n the Sub urb a n

Re side ntia l future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns a nd the RR-3 (rura l) zo ning

AREA 6: SHELL ISLAND TRACE FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Char le ston

Change F L U to Rur al Re side ntial Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 6: SHELL ISLAND TRACE UGB & FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to b e c o nsiste nt with a re a

zo ning :

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the R-4 (sub urb a n) zo ning distric t in the

Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a ; a nd

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the RR-3 (rura l) zo ning distric t in the Rura l

Are a

• Are a is e ntire ly uninc o rpo ra te d
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• Ame nd the F

L U to b e c o nsiste nt with c urre nt zo ning

Consensus?

AREA 7: HAROLD MAHAN ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to b e c o nsiste nt with a re a

zo ning :

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the R-4 (sub urb a n) zo ning distric t in the

Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a ; a nd

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the RR-3 (rura l) zo ning distric t in the

Rura l Are a

• Are a is e ntire ly uninc o rpo ra te d
• L
• c a tio n diffe rs slig htly fro m the City o f Cha rle sto n

UGB

• City sta ff a g re e s the ir UGB sho uld b e mo ve d to the sa me

lo c a tio n

AREA 7: HAROLD MAHAN ROAD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

City of Char le ston

AREA 7: HAROLD MAHAN ROAD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Ame nd the future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns to b e

c o nsiste nt with c urre nt zo ning

AREA 7: HAROLD MAHAN ROAD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Char le ston

Change F L U to Rur al Re side ntial Pr

• pose d UGB

Change F L U to Subur ban Re side ntial

AREA 7: HAROLD MAHAN ROAD UGB & FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to b e c o nsiste nt with a re a

zo ning :

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the R-4 (sub urb a n) zo ning distric t in the

Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a ; a nd

• Pla c e the pa rc e ls in the RR-3 (rura l) zo ning distric t in the Rura l

Are a

• Are a is e ntire ly uninc o rpo ra te d
• L
• c a tio n diffe rs slig htly fro m the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• Ame nd the F

L U to b e c o nsiste nt with c urre nt zo ning

Consensus?

AREA 8: PLOWGROUND/RIVER RD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Mo ve the Co unty UGB b a c k to its lo c a tio n in the

1999 Pla n to b e c o nsiste nt with c urre nt zo ning

• UGB wa s mo ve d to its c urre nt lo c a tio n during the 2003 Pla n

Re vie w a t the re q ue st o f a pro pe rty o wne r

• T

ha t pro pe rty ha s b e e n de ve lo pe d unde r RR-3 (rura l) zo ning re g ula tio ns

• Are a is e ntire ly uninc o rpo ra te d
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB

AREA 8: PLOWGROUND/RIVER RD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

City of Char le ston

AREA 8: PLOWGROUND/RIVER RD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Ame nd the future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns to b e

c o nsiste nt with c urre nt zo ning

AREA 8: PLOWGROUND/RIVER RD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Char le ston

Change F L U to Rur al Re side ntial Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 8: PLOWGROUND/RIVER RD UGB & FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Mo ve the Co unty UGB b a c k to its lo c a tio n in the 1999

Pla n to b e c o nsiste nt with c urre nt zo ning

• UGB wa s mo ve d to its c urre nt lo c a tio n during the 2003 Pla n

Re vie w a t the re q ue st o f a pro pe rty o wne r

• T

ha t pro pe rty ha s b e e n de ve lo pe d unde r RR-3 (rura l) zo ning re g ula tio ns

• Are a is e ntire ly uninc o rpo ra te d
• Sa me lo c a tio n a s the City o f Cha rle sto n UGB
• Ame nd the F

L U to b e c o nsiste nt with c urre nt zo ning

Consensus?

AREA 9: ABUNDANT/TRUCKLANDS RD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w the utility e a se me nt

a nd munic ipa l b o unda ry

• Are a is e ntire ly within the City o f Cha rle sto n
• L
• c a tio n diffe rs slig htly fro m the City o f Cha rle sto n

UGB

• City sta ff a g re e s the ir UGB sho uld b e mo ve d to the sa me

lo c a tio n

AREA 9: ABUNDANT/TRUCKLANDS RD UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

City of Char le ston

AREA 9: ABUNDANT/TRUCKLANDS RD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• T

he F L U re c o mme nda tio ns fo r the Ab unda nt Rd - Ab ra m Rd a re a is Rura l I ndustria l

• Are a wa s re c o mme nde d fo r I

ndustria l F L U in the 1999 Pla n due to its pro ximity to the a irpo rt

• All I

ndustria l future la nd use re c o mme nda tio ns in the Rura l Are a we re c ha ng e d to Rura l I ndustria l in 2008

• Are a c o nta ins a g ric ultura l a nd re side ntia l use s
• T

he F L U re c o mme nda tio ns in this a re a sho uld b e c ha ng e d to :

• Ag ric ultura l Re side ntia l fo r pa rc e ls zo ne d R-4 a nd AGR
• Rura l Ag ric ultura l fo r pa rc e ls zo ne d AG-8

AREA 9: ABUNDANT/TRUCKLANDS RD ZONING

City of Char le ston

Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 9: ABUNDANT/TRUCKLANDS RD FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Char le ston

Change F L U to Rur al Agr ic ultur al and Agr ic ultur al Re side ntial, as appr

• pr

iate Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 9: ABUNDANT/TRUCKLANDS RD UGB & FLU RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w the utility e a se me nt

a nd munic ipa l b o unda ry

• Cha ng e the F

L U re c o mme nda tio ns to :

• Ag ric ultura l Re side ntia l fo r pa rc e ls zo ne d R-4 a nd AGR
• Rura l Ag ric ultura l fo r pa rc e ls zo ne d AG-8

Consensus?

AREA 10: KIAWAH RIVER PLANTATION UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w the pa rc e l

b o unda rie s o f K ia wa h Rive r Pla nta tio n (a ppro ve d de ve lo pme nt a g re e me nt)

• Pro pe rty is uninc o rpo ra te d
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

AREA 10: KIAWAH RIVER PLANTATION UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

Kia wa h Rive r Pla nta tion

AREA 10: KIAWAH RIVER PLANTATION UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w the pa rc e l

b o unda rie s o f K ia wa h Rive r Pla nta tio n (a ppro ve d de ve lo pme nt a g re e me nt)

• Pro pe rty is uninc o rpo ra te d
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

Consensus?

AREA 11: BETSY KERRISON PKWY UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w Be tsy K

e rriso n Pa rkwa y:

• Pla c e s the pa rc e ls in the Ag ric ultura l Re side ntia l F

L U de sig na tio n a nd zo ning distric t in the Rura l Are a

• Pla c e s the pa rc e ls in the Sub urb a n Re side ntia l F

L U a nd R-4/ PD zo ning distric ts in the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a

• Are a is e ntire ly uninc o rpo ra te d
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

AREA 11: BETSY KERRISON PKWY UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

Cur r e nt UGB Pr

• pose d UGB

AREA 11: BETSY KERRISON PKWY UGB RECOMMENDATIONS

• Adjust the Co unty UGB to fo llo w Be tsy K

e rriso n Pa rkwa y:

• Pla c e s the pa rc e ls in the Ag ric ultura l Re side ntia l F

L U de sig na tio n a nd zo ning distric t in the Rura l Are a

• Pla c e s the pa rc e ls in the Sub urb a n Re side ntia l F

L U a nd R- 4/ PD zo ning distric ts in the Urb a n/ Sub urb a n Are a

• Pro pe rty is uninc o rpo ra te d
• No future la nd use re c o mme nda tio n c ha ng e s

Consensus?