hisbus online panel a virtual village for students
play

HISBUS Online Panel A Virtual Village for Students as Instrument of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HISBUS Online Panel A Virtual Village for Students as Instrument of Political Consultation and Instant Information Presentation in Zagreb 20/21 June 2007 20/21 June 2007 Peter Mig-Trapp 1 Contents 1. Overview: Objectives and Philosophy


  1. HISBUS Online Panel A Virtual Village for Students as Instrument of Political Consultation and Instant Information Presentation in Zagreb 20/21 June 2007 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 1

  2. Contents 1. Overview: Objectives and Philosophy 2. Standardization: Enquiry procedure / Presentation of results 3. Representativeness 4. Security Concept and Data Protection 5. Incentives and draws 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 2

  3. 1. Objectives and Philosophy Students research in the Web • panel of 10.000 students • continuously available at any time • nationwide representativeness • quick delivery of results – standard enquiry: 6 weeks – quick enquiry: 1 to 2 weeks max. 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 3

  4. 1. Objectives and Philosophy Virtual village for students The interviewees ... • ... are " experts " in education and higher education policy • ... are not just objects of curious interviews, but political consultants • ... exert influence on decision-making processes and political discussions 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 4

  5. 1. Objectives and Philosophy The online panel's 4 advantages 1. Costs (printing, postage, reminders, returns, data collection) 2. Speediness (1 – 6 weeks between designation of the problem and delivery of the results) 3. Quality of data (online plausibilization) 4. Expenditure for the interviewee (reuse of master data / pre-enquiries) 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 5

  6. 1. Overview and objectives Filter guidances (1) 5.1 Standard grant BAföG 5. How financed? foreign countries extra grant (federal grant) (if applicable) Extra granted No extra and residence grant in an EU country (question 2) Parents, 5.1.1 Studies abroad even own resources, without extra grant? grant, other 5.2 Percentage of expenses covered by BAföG? 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 6

  7. 1. Overview and objectives Filter guidances (2) Fortsetzung von Seite 1 Begrüßung, Erläuterungen 2. weiterer - nein, kein Interesse Auslandsaufenthalt - nein, weil ... geplant? ja, Praktikum 1. studienbez. ja studiert Ausl.-aufenthalt ja, Sonstiges durchgeführt? nein nein, sehe keine Realisierungschance 2. Welches Land? - weiß nicht - ja, eventuell Weiter auf Seite 2 - ja, ganz bestimmt - ja, habe schon Vorbereitungen getroffen 3. Welche Hindernisse? 3. Wie lange? (Fremdsprachenkenntnisse, Informationen, Trennung von Part. u. Familie, Finanzen, etc.) 4. Welche Art 3. Entsprach Auslandsstudium geplant? die Dauer Ihren Vorstellungen? 4. Warum sehen Sie keine nein, wäre Auslandsstudium Realisierungschance? gern länger geblieben! 5. Wie lange? nein, kürzer - Praktikum als geplant! - Sonstiges ja! - weiß nicht 6. Welche Gründe für 4.1 Warum verkürzt? 4.2 Warum nicht länger geblieben? diese Dauer? 7. Welches Land? 8. Welche 5.1. Finanzierungsquellen? Betrag Normalförderung 5. Wie finanziert? BAföG ggf. Betrag Ausl.-Zuschlag Zuschlag erhalten und Aufenthalt in EU-Land (Frage 2) 9. BAföG-Förderung? ja nein 5.1.1 auch Auslandsstudium nein, aber früher kein wenn kein Zuschlag? Zuschlag Eltern 9. Neuregelung: Möglichkeit, BAföG ins Ausland mitzunehmen eigene Mittel bekannt? Stipendium 5.2 Wieviel % der Ausgaben Sonstiges durch BAföG gedeckt? 10. Hätten Sie diese 10. Erwägen Sie, diese Möglichkeit genutzt? Möglichkeit zu nutzen? Ende Weiter auf Seite 2 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 7

  8. 1. Overview and objectives Master data (1) A. University and studies B. Educational background • university? • type of university • subject? admission • degree? – when achieved? • second studies? – which way? – when? – in what place (Zip code)? – what subject was first? • vocational education? • no. of university and – kind? subject terms? – when (prior, after, during • change of subject or the studies)? degree? 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 8

  9. 1. Overview and objectives Master data (2) D. Social background C. Personal details • graduations of mother • sex? and father? • year of birth? • finished vocational • civil status? education of mother and • children? father? • job position of mother and – how many? father? – how old? (subtly differentiated into • nationality? 17 categories) 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 9

  10. 1. Overview and objectives Topics / enquiries (selection) • Teacher shortage • Studies abroad and BAföG grant • Utility value of university rankings • Children planned? Students' conceptions of life • The Bolgona process: knowledge and acceptance • Acceptance of study fees • E-Learning • Knowledge of foreign languages • Pisa – knowledge acquired at school and capability to study 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 10

  11. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (1) • agreement on topic 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept • identification of relevant content areas 2. Operationalization • exploration of previous topic- 3. Implementation into web questionnaire related research 4. Expert test 5. Pretest in the field 6. Enquiry field phase 7. Plausibilization 8. Statistical evaluation 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 11

  12. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (2) 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept • questionnaire design with 2. Operationalization regards to content 3. Implementation into • sequence web questionnaire 4. Expert test • ensuring comparability with other captures 5. Pretest in the field 6. Enquiry field phase • development of scales 7. Plausibilization • etc. 8. Statistical evaluation 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 12

  13. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (3) 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept 2. Operationalization • adaptation to media (online 3. Implementation into version) web questionnaire • individualization (filter 4. Expert test creation) 5. Pretest in the field • technical implementation 6. Enquiry field phase (use of OPST, 7. Plausibilization O nline P anel S ite T ool of 8. Statistical evaluation Globalpark) 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 13

  14. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (4) 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept 2. Operationalization 3. Implementation into web questionnaire • first quick online test of the 4. Expert test questionnaire by ... 5. Pretest in the field • HIS experts and ... 6. Enquiry field phase • client experts 7. Plausibilization 8. Statistical evaluation 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 14

  15. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (5) 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept 2. Operationalization 3. Implementation into web questionnaire 4. Expert test • test of the questionnaire by a 5. Pretest in the field small group of panel 6. Enquiry field phase participants 7. Plausibilization 8. Statistical evaluation 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 15

  16. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (6) 1. Coordination of the duration: 15 – 20 days enquiry concept • invitation of participants by 2. Operationalization E-mail 3. Implementation into • participation reminder after web questionnaire approx. 5 days 4. Expert test • second reminder after 5. Pretest in the field approx. 10 to 15 days 6. Enquiry field phase 7. Plausibilization 8. Statistical evaluation 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 16

  17. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (7) 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept 2. Operationalization 3. Implementation into web questionnaire • plausibilization of answers 4. Expert test 5. Pretest in the field • set up of aggregate variables 6. Enquiry field phase (e.g. age by age-groups) 7. Plausibilization 8. Statistical evaluation 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 17

  18. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (8) 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept 2. Operationalization creation of evaluations 3. Implementation into corresponding to web questionnaire stated questions 4. Expert test • frequency count 5. Pretest in the field • comparison of means 6. Enquiry field phase • cross-classified tables 7. Plausibilization • etc. 8. Statistical evaluation 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 18

  19. 2. Enquiry procedure Enquiry procedure (9) 1. Coordination of the enquiry concept 2. Operationalization 3. Implementation into web questionnaire 4. Expert test creation of a summary report 5. Pretest in the field including ... 6. Enquiry field phase • a very brief commentary to 7. Plausibilization the most important results 8. Statistical evaluation • extensive figures 9. Result processing 20/21 June 2007 Peter Müßig-Trapp 19

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend