Liquidity saving mechanisms and bank behaviour Marco Galbiati BoE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

liquidity saving mechanisms and bank behaviour
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Liquidity saving mechanisms and bank behaviour Marco Galbiati BoE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Liquidity saving mechanisms and bank behaviour Marco Galbiati BoE Kimmo Soramki VerticeTree ABM-BaF Torino - 10 February 2009 Interbank payment systems Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) mode Incentives to queue Games


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Liquidity saving mechanisms and bank behaviour

Marco Galbiati – BoE Kimmo Soramäki – VerticeTree

ABM-BaF Torino - 10 February 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Interbank payment systems

Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) mode

  • Incentives to queue
  • ‘Games’ being played on a liquidity/delay tradeoff
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Interbank payment systems

Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) mode

  • Incentives to queue
  • ‘Games’ being played on a liquidity/delay tradeoff
  • Pool internal queues!
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interbank payment systems

Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) mode

  • Incentives to queue
  • ‘Games’ being played on a liquidity/delay tradeoff

Liquidity Saving Mechanisms (LSMs)

  • Pool internal queues!
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Aims

  • 1. Model a system with internal queues (LMM)
  • 2. Look at how much liquidity/delay a LSM

reduces in theory

  • 3. Look at how banks would use a LSM

 An ‘agent-based’ model

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Model of a payment system

  • N banks
  • A ‘day’ of several ‘seconds’
  • Random payment orders
  • random pairs ‘payer&payee’
  • for each payment a ‘urgency’ parameter u ~ U[0,1]
  • Each bank sends payment orders in either of two ‘pipes’

(streams): RTGS or Queue

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A B C E D

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A B C E D

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A B C E D

slide-10
SLIDE 10

1 A B C E D Low urgency? RTGS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

1 A B C E D Low urgency? RTGS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1 High urgency? Queue A B C E D

slide-13
SLIDE 13

High urgency? Queue A B C E D

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A B C E D

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A B C E D

slide-16
SLIDE 16

A B C E D

slide-17
SLIDE 17

A B C E D

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A B C E D

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A B C E D

high u

slide-20
SLIDE 20

A B C E D

low u

slide-21
SLIDE 21

A B C E D

slide-22
SLIDE 22

A B C E D

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A B C E D

slide-24
SLIDE 24

A B C E D

slide-25
SLIDE 25

A B C E D

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A B C E D

slide-27
SLIDE 27

A B C E D

slide-28
SLIDE 28

A B C E D

slide-29
SLIDE 29

End of day Cost = delay cost + liquidity costs = _ uk • (tk - tk’) + _ • a A B C E D

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Very low liquidity

% routed to RTGS cost

Illustration of costs

Liquidity cost

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Illustration of costs

Delay cost

Very low liquidity

% routed to RTGS cost

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Total cost

Very low liquidity

% routed to RTGS

Illustration of costs

cost

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Total cost

Very low liquidity

Total cost

Very high liquidity

% routed to RTGS % routed to RTGS

Illustration of costs

cost

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Banks choose

–opening liquidity balance: _ –urgency threshold to queue: _

The game

  • For each strategy profile (_1, _1), (_2, _2), (_3, _3)… (_N, _N)

a payoff (cost) function

  • We look at Nash equilibrium for 2 cases:
  • ‘LMM’ - low urgency payments in internal queues
  • ‘LSM’ - low urgency payments in central queue
slide-35
SLIDE 35

A B C E D

AB

slide-36
SLIDE 36

A B C E D

AB

slide-37
SLIDE 37

A B C E D

AB AB

slide-38
SLIDE 38

A B C E D

slide-39
SLIDE 39

A B C E D

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Agent-based modelling

Liquidity flows very complex  simulate the settlement process to compute costs, and hence equilibria

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Agent-based modelling

We look at symmetric equilibria: {(_1, _1), (_2, _2), (_3, _3)… (_N, _N)} : (_i, _i) = (_j, _j) for each i, j

Liquidity flows very complex  simulate the settlement process to compute costs, and hence equilibria

slide-42
SLIDE 42

1 Model with internal queues (LMM)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

1

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Increase “your” threshold 1

Delay costs

Delay costs with LMM

slide-45
SLIDE 45

2 Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-46
SLIDE 46

3 Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-47
SLIDE 47

4 Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-48
SLIDE 48

5 Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

6

slide-50
SLIDE 50

7 Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-51
SLIDE 51

8 Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-52
SLIDE 52

9 Increase “your” threshold

Delay costs with LMM

Delay costs

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Delay costs with LMM

system level

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Equilibria - LMM

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Equilibria - LMM

Increase liquidity price a

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Equilibria - LMM

Increase liquidity price a

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Equilibria - LMM

Increase liquidity price a

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Equilibria - LMM

Increase liquidity price a

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Equilibria - LMM

Increase liquidity price a

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Equilibria - LMM

Increase liquidity price a

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Equilibria - LMM

Increase liquidity price a

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Cost Liquidity

Equil.

*

Planner Too little liquidity, too much queueing

Equilibria - LMM

slide-63
SLIDE 63

2 Potential savings from a LSM

(‘LSM mechanics’)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

RTGS + LMM RTGS + LSM

Savings in liquidity

slide-65
SLIDE 65

All in RTGS   All queued

RTGS + LMM RTGS + LSM

Savings in liquidity

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Savings in delay costs

slide-67
SLIDE 67

3 How would banks use the LSM ?

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Delay costs with LSM

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Increasing “your” threshold

Delay costs with LSM

slide-70
SLIDE 70

UAD

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Delay costs with LSM

Increasing “your” threshold

slide-78
SLIDE 78

_ - equilibria with LSM

slide-79
SLIDE 79

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-80
SLIDE 80

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-81
SLIDE 81

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-82
SLIDE 82

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-83
SLIDE 83

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-84
SLIDE 84

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-85
SLIDE 85

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-86
SLIDE 86

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-87
SLIDE 87

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-88
SLIDE 88

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-89
SLIDE 89

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-90
SLIDE 90

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-91
SLIDE 91

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-92
SLIDE 92

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-93
SLIDE 93

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-94
SLIDE 94

At high liquidity cost this is the only equilibrium

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-95
SLIDE 95

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-96
SLIDE 96

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-97
SLIDE 97

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-98
SLIDE 98

At very high liquidity cost planner and banks choose the same

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-99
SLIDE 99

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-100
SLIDE 100

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-101
SLIDE 101

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-102
SLIDE 102

_ - equilibria with LSM

Increase liquidity price

slide-103
SLIDE 103
slide-104
SLIDE 104

liquidity thresh. costs

LMM vs LSM (good) equilibria

slide-105
SLIDE 105

liquidity thresh. costs

LMM vs LSM (good) equilibria

slide-106
SLIDE 106

costs

LMM vs LSM (good) equilibria

slide-107
SLIDE 107

cost ratio costs

LMM vs LSM (good) equilibria

slide-108
SLIDE 108

LMM vs LSM (bad) equilibria

liquidity thresh. costs

slide-109
SLIDE 109

Conclusions

In the hands of a ‘planner’, LSM can save substantial amounts of liquidity, and largely improve settlement speed

slide-110
SLIDE 110

Conclusions

In the hands of a ‘planner’, LSM can save substantial amounts of liquidity, and largely improve settlement speed

(but may require radical choices)

In the hands of individual banks, LSM may require some ‘coordination device’ to yield its potential benefits

slide-111
SLIDE 111

Conclusions

In the hands of a ‘planner’, LSM can save substantial amounts of liquidity, and largely improve settlement speed In the hands of individual banks, LSM may require some ‘coordination device’ to yield its potential benefits

slide-112
SLIDE 112

Slide 112

slide-113
SLIDE 113

Slide 113 (!) ~ _ ~ Many thanks