hip, transitioning from command and control to teaming and trust - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hip transitioning from command and control to teaming and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

hip, transitioning from command and control to teaming and trust - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Joining Humans and Robots at the hip, transitioning from command and control to teaming and trust Dr. Scott Reed Head of Engineering The 5 Year Vision 1. Can you survey the 1 sq. km area immediately outside the harbour? 3. I see the ATR


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Joining Humans and Robots at the hip, transitioning from command and control to teaming and trust

  • Dr. Scott Reed

Head of Engineering

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The 5 Year Vision

  • 1. Can you

survey the 1 sq. km area immediately

  • utside the

harbour?

  • 2. Deck checks

complete, on my

  • way. ETA 2 hours.
  • 3. I see the ATR

has picked up a

  • contact. Send

me a snippet for verification

  • 4. ATR Snippet sent.

Reminder: can you get maintenance to check to my rudder?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Human-Machine Teaming

Problems to Overcome

Mental Model : The user’s belief on what a system can do will strongly impact whether they use it, trust it and determine how they use it Trustworthy Robotics:

  • Communications: What is the system doing?
  • Transparency: How does it work and why is it doing it?
  • Involvement: The user must feel in control

Dependability and Predictability are key for trust

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Command and Control

  • f Unmanned Assets

Effective Human- Machine Interaction Mission Level Autonomy

Transitioning to effective HMI

Multi-modal interaction On-board Reasoning Smart Communications End-user engagement

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Level 2: Adaptive

Level 3: Distributed

Level 4: Multidomain

Level 5: Variable

Level 1: Navigate

SeeByte Mission Level Autonomy

2003 2009 2014 2016 now

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why use different modalities?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

(click image for video)

  • Prof. H. Hastie, Dr D. Robb, J. Chiyah

Multi-modal Interaction

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Example Interactions

Start the mission! On my way How long until mission completion? 55 minutes Starting survey OpArea0. All previous objectives completed. OK. Proceed Abort objective. Vehicle SN224 taking over. I am not receiving any updates from side-scan sonar

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Integrating AR into Interactions

Can AR remove the water problem?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Location Vehicle information Vehicle Compass – heading Map Field of view Objectives Vehicle path to objective

(click image for video)

Participating with AR

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Richer levels of on-board classification allow autonomous decision

making and autonomy explainability

On-board Reasoning

Clutter Flat Ripple Rock Cone Cylinder Sphere Wedge

slide-12
SLIDE 12

10 bytes 20 bytes 5 bytes

1 packet

Original

25 bytes 50 bytes 70 bytes

3 packets

Reconstruction

8192 bytes

Transmission

100 bytes

10 packets

200 bytes 4096 bytes

(JPG compression) (semantic compression)

200 packets 20 bytes / packet

ORIGINAL DATA MODEL

Smart Communications

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • On-going, iterative engagement with the end-user is vital to ensure the

autonomy technology adds capability

  • The User Experience is key – the technology must be simple, intuitive

and add value

  • Technology must be delivered that can operate within SOP’s

End User Engagement

Tracking of eyes can stop / start PMA

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Current autonomy operations focus principally on planning after which

  • perators are “autonomy observers”

Transitioning to effective Human-Machine Autonomy requires:

  • Mission Level Autonomy allowing dynamic re-tasking and re-planning
  • Multi-modal interactions
  • Improved on-board perception to allow explainability
  • Smart communications to leverage available bandwidth and prioritise data

sharing

  • Continual end-user interaction

Summary