highw ay 1 corridor investment program highw ay 1 tier i
play

Highw ay 1 Corridor Investment Program Highw ay 1 Tier I/II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Highw ay 1 Corridor Investment Program Highw ay 1 Tier I/II Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment Project Update November 2017 November 2017 Agenda Project Overview Purpose and Need Project Phasing Project


  1. Highw ay 1 Corridor Investment Program Highw ay 1 Tier I/II Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment Project Update November 2017 November 2017

  2. Agenda • Project Overview • Purpose and Need • Project Phasing • Project Alternatives • Project Status • Update on Draft Environmental Document Comment Resolution • Review Key Issues • PDT Preferred Alternative • Preferred Alternative Selection November 2017 2

  3. Corridor Limits • Planned Improvements - 9 miles on Highway 1 – San Andreas to Morrissey November 2017 3

  4. Purpose and Need • Purpose of the Highway 1 Corridor Environmental Analysis • Reduce congestion • Encourage carpooling and use of alternative transportation modes as means to increase capacity • Improve safety November 2017 4

  5. Purpose and Need • Existing and Anticipated Needs to Address • Recurrent congestion • Existing and future delays for commuters, commerce, and emergency vehicles • Disincentives to use transit; congestion prevents cost-effective transit service • No incentives to carpool and lack of supporting facilities • Accident rates exceed statewide averages • “Cut-Through” traffic on local streets November 2017 5

  6. Project Phasing • Phased approach to implement project over an extended time period • Tier I: Program -level review (corridor) • Tier II: Project -level review (segment) • Future Tier II projects subject to project level environmental analysis November 2017 6

  7. Tier I & Tier II Project Limits November 2017 7

  8. Tier I Corridor - Alternatives Under Consideration • No Build Alternative • Does not address corridor purpose and need but offers comparison with impacts of other alternatives • Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative • Lower cost improvements to partly address corridor purpose and need without adding capacity • High Occupancy Vehicle Lane (HOV) Alternative • Designed to fully address corridor purpose and need November 2017

  9. Tier I Corridor : Engineering - Alternatives Development • Key Issues • Geometric constraints • Interchange review process • Engineering design- • Optimize local circulation • Caltrans standard design and right of way impacts • Caltrans conceptual agreement on corridor footprint November 2017 9

  10. Tier I Corridor : Engineering - Special Studies • Mobility Assessment • Transit Market Analysis (access and usage) • Mainline vehicular movements • Vehicular movements at ramp termini (safety) • Pedestrian movements at interchanges and overcrossings November 2017 10

  11. Tier II : Engineering - Project Limits • Standard Auxiliary Lanes • Chanticleer Ped/Bike Overcrossing • Total Project Cost $28M Final Design, ROW, & Construction • Auxiliary Lanes $21M, Bike/Ped OC - $7M November 2017 11

  12. Chanticleer Bike/Ped Overcrossing NB SB November 2017 12

  13. Project Timeline Adopt Final Tiered EI R/ EA Approach DED Public to per Circulation FHW A FHW A Sum m er 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 8 Fall 2 0 1 7 Nov 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 1 June 2 0 1 3 Adm inistrative Select FHW A Preferred Draft EI R/ EA Approval Tiered Alternative Docum ent November 2017 13

  14. Project Status Project Status November 2017 14

  15. Environmental Document Overview • Joint CEQA/NEPA document • California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment Draft document was circulated for public • Combined Tier I and Tier II comments from November 4, 2015, document to January 25, 2016 November 2017 15

  16. Comment Resolution Update • 900 Separate Comments Received • Key Issues • Traffic / Air Quality / Greenhouse Gases • Biology • Cumulative Impacts Assessment • Growth Inducement Study November 2017 16

  17. Key issues - Traffic / Air Quality/ Greenhouse Gases • Issue • Use of 2004 AMBAG Model and Growth Projections • Resolution • Updated Traffic Analysis Memorandum • Air Quality Study Addendum Mirrors Updated Traffic Analysis November 2017 17

  18. Key issues - Biology • Issue • Santa Cruz Long-toed Salamander (SCLTS) Upland Habitat Impacts • Resolution • Completed Focused study on Upland Habitat • Updated Project Description November 2017 18

  19. Key issues – Cumulative Impact Assessment • Issues • Not Addressed Comprehensively • Resolution • Prepare a new 8-Step Cumulative Impacts Analysis November 2017 19

  20. Key issues – Grow th Inducement • Issue • Validate 2008 Growth Study Conclusion • Resolution • Prepare an Addendum With New Data November 2017 20

  21. PDT Preferred Alternative • On October 3, 2017, PDT Recommended: • The HOV Lane Alternative as the Preferred Tier I alternative, and • The Tier II Build Alternative as the preferred Tier II alternative • Review Alternative Comparison Matrix November 2017 21

  22. 2035 Annual Delay Tier I Peak hour speed Person Cost Alternatives (mph) (current hours $ million) (million) Tier I HOV Northbound AM = 39 $31 1.6 Alternative Southbound PM = 33 NB AM = 21 Tier I TSM 5.6 $107 Alternative SB PM = 10 NB AM = 12 No Build 8.0 $152 SB PM = 11 November 2017 22

  23. Greenhouse Gas 2035 Cut-through Emissions per Year Tier I Traffic 2035 compared to 2003 Alternatives (vehicles per day reduction) (metric tons/year) Soquel Drive (near Tier I HOV -33,413 Capitola Ave): 30,500 Alternative Other roads improve Tier I TSM No capacity -30,502 Alternative improvement No Build -32,907 None November 2017 23

  24. Tier I - Preferred Alternative Tier I HOV Lane Alternative recommended by the Project Development Team • Provides More Options for Future Tier II Projects • Overall Performance Addresses Project Purpose and Need • Reduce Cut-Through Traffic on Local Streets • Provides for Multi-Modal Operations November 2017 24

  25. Tier II – Build Alternative Tier II Build Alternative recommended by the Project Development Team • An important step towards implementing the HOV Lane Alternative • Consistent with the Measure D transportation sales tax measure approved by voters November 2017 25

  26. Environmental Review Process • Environmental review process for Tier I/Tier II EIR/EA • Response to comments/preparation of Final EIR/EA: November/December 2017 • FED to FHWA August 2018 • Certify Final EIR/Sign Finding of No Significant Impact: December 2018 November 2017 26

  27. Questions and Answers November 2017 27

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend