High-latitude & Equatorial Ionospheric Scintillation Based on An - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

high latitude equatorial ionospheric scintillation based
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

High-latitude & Equatorial Ionospheric Scintillation Based on An - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

High-latitude & Equatorial Ionospheric Scintillation Based on An Event-Driven Multi-GNSS Data Collection System Jade Morton, Yu Jiao, Steve Taylor Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Colorado State University 2015 IES Slide 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Slide 1

2015 IES

Jade Morton, Yu Jiao, Steve Taylor Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Colorado State University

High-latitude & Equatorial Ionospheric Scintillation Based on An Event-Driven Multi-GNSS Data Collection System

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Slide 2

2015 IES

Outline

  • 1. Why Event-Driven Multi-GNSS ?
  • 1. Sample High-Lat & Equatorial Results
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Slide 3

2015 IES

Amplitude Fading: Receiver Processing Artifacts

50 52 54 56 58 60 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Time(sec) C/N0(dB-Hz)

Tracked C/N0 Simulated C/N0

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Slide 4

2015 IES

GPS Carrier Phase During Deep Fading: An Example

  • 1.5
  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5

  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

Time (ms)

Signal Intensity (dB) Carrier Phase (Cycles) 20 40 60 80

  • 10
  • 20
  • 30
  • 40

0.5 0.5 1 1.5 CTL 10ms FPF 10ms FPF 40ms

*

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Slide 5

2015 IES

Issues: Conventional ISM Receivers High quality, raw GNSS signals are needed for space weather studies and robust GNSS receiver development

  • 1. Accuracy

(Iono + other) X h(t) = Observed Effects Iono effects ≠ Observed Effects

  • 2. Availability

Receivers cease to function during strong space weather events  Data are not available when needed most!

  • 3. Repeatability

Receiver processing is irreversible  Ionosphere effects are wiped out during processing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Slide 6

2015 IES

Event Driven Raw Data Collection System

Commercial ISM Receiver RF Front End 1 RF Front End 2 RF Front End N Space Weather Events Data Collection and Control Server Space Weather Event Monitoring & Trigger Software Circular Buffer Circular Buffer Circular Buffer Data Storage

VPN Data Center at Home Institution Internet

Specially designed signal tracking algorithms Scientific analysis Algorithm development

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Slide 7

2015 IES

Event-Driven Multi-Constellation GNSS Network

Ethiopia

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Slide 8

2015 IES

Equatorial Scintillation Spatial Distribution

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Slide 9

2015 IES

Diurnal Patterns

6 12 18 24 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Hours after sunset

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Slide 10

2015 IES

Solar Cycle Dependence: High vs. Low Lat

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Slide 11

2015 IES

100

  • 800

800

Percent B Field Variation (nT) H D Z Percent of SV Affected

Geomagnetic Disturbance Impact on High Latitude

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (Hours)

HAARP, AK 7/15/2012

500 1000 1500 2000 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 (nT) Probability of maxσφ >30o

maxH - minH maxD - minD maxZ - minZ (H2+D2+Z2)1/2 peak-to-peak

150 300 450 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 (nT)

σH σD σZ (σH 2+σD 2+σZ 2)1/2

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Slide 12

2015 IES

Frequency Diversity: Selective Fading

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Slide 13

2015 IES

Multi-Frequency Deep Fading

Carrier Phaser Reversal During Deep Fading

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Slide 14

2015 IES

Adaptive Joint Time-Frequency Analysis

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Slide 15

2015 IES

Irregularity Dynamics Sensing Using GNSS Array

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Slide 16

2015 IES

Array Processing: HAARP (Gakona, Alaska)

Lat: 62.39o, Lon: 145.15oW

North HF Heating Array Operation Center Ant 1 Ant 2 Ant 3 Science Pad 3 Ant 4 1km 3km ¼ km

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Slide 17

2015 IES

Commercial ISM Receiver SDR 1 GPS L1/GAL E1 SDR 3 GAL E5b/BDS B2 Data Collection and Control Server Space Weather Event Monitoring & Trigger Software VPN

Internet

SDR 6 GPS L2C SDR 7 BDS B1 SDR 2 GPS L5/GAL E5a SDR 4 GLO L1 SDR 5 GLO L2 Circular Buffer RAID Storage

OCXO

Gakona Poker Flat (65.1oN, 147.5oW) (62.3oN, 145.3oW) 9 % A u r

  • r

a l

  • v

a l b

  • u

n d a r y

New Alaska Deployment

Poker Flat Advanced Modular Incoherent Scatter Radar (AMISR) Multi-Constellation GNSS Receiver Array

Ant 1 Ant 2 Ant 3

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Slide 18

2015 IES

Plasma Structure Dynamics Monitoring

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Slide 19

2015 IES

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750

σφ (degrees) Available SuperDARN Data Points

Available SuperDARN Data Points vs. σφ Scintillation Low/no scintillation

Comparison with SuperDARN

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Slide 20

2015 IES

Novel GNSS Receiver Algorithms

  • Adaptive Filtering
  • Adaptive Inter-Channel Frequency Aiding
  • Multi-Constellation Vector Processing
  • Fixed Position Feedback
  • Adaptive Drift Velocity Feedback
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Slide 21

2015 IES

Conclusions

  • High quality GNSS data is needed for

– Continuous, accurate interpretation of ionosphere processes – Robust GNSS receivers development

  • Successful data collection system yielding both known results

as well as new observations

– Adaptive processing is needed – Computation cost need to be improved

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Slide 22

2015 IES

Acknowledgements

  • Funding support from:

– AFOSR, AFRL, NSF, DAGSI, Miami Univ., Colorado State Univ. – Industrial support: Rockwell Collins, Honeywell, Northrop Grumman, Mitre Co., Lockheed Martin, Topcon, Symmetricom, Septentrio, Novatel, John Deere.

  • Collaborators:

– Ohio University, AFIT, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Singapore Nanyang Technical University, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Boston College, Stanford University, University of Colorado Boulder, University of Hawaii – Arecibo Observatory, Jicamarca Radio Observatory, Poker Flat Rocket Range and HAARP, Sondrestrom Observatory.

  • Students/Post-docs:

– Harrison Bourne, Steve Taylor, Jun Wang, Joy Jiao, Dongyang Xu, Brian Breitsch, Jack Hall, Brian Jamieson, Mark Carroll, Robert Cole, Hang Yin, Richard Marcus, Mellissa Simms, Fan Zhang, Kyle Wyan, Kyle Kauffman, Xiaolei Mao, Ruihui Di, Fei Niu, Ryan Wolfarth, Praveen Vikram, Dan Charney, Greg Distler, Greg Newstadt, Adam Hill, Matt Cosgrove, Nick Matteo, Aaron Pittenger, Priyanka Chandrasekaran, Cheng Wang, Xiaoli Liu, Senlin Peng, Nazalie Kassanbian, Lei Zhang, Xin Chen, Hu Wang, Hong Wu, Yanhong Kou.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Slide 23

2015 IES

Common Volume LEO and Ground Observations

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Slide 24

2015 IES

Multi-Frequency Fading Analysis

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Slide 25

2015 IES

Fading Overlap: Ascension Island

Very small percentage Fading band L1 L2C L5

L1 only 95.3% / / L2C only / 82.9% / L5 only / / 80.7% Concurrent L1 and L2C 3.0% 1.3% / Concurrent L1 and L5 1.4% / 0.7% Concurrent L2C and L5 / 15.7% 18.5% Concurrent L1, L2C and L5 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%

Fading Number

L1 1,791 L2C 4,591 L5 1,584

Total 7,966

Threshold of detrended signal intensity: -15dB

Concurrent L1, L2C and L5 0.2% 0.1% 0.1%

More on Hong Kong, Singapore, and Brazil