higgs factory studies etc
play

Higgs Factory Studies etc. Work in progress aconway@fnal.gov 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Higgs Factory Studies etc. Work in progress aconway@fnal.gov 1 Higgs Cross Section vs Beam Width Peak value of SM 125GeV Higgs Breit- Wigner convoluted with Gaussian beam. Does not include initial state radiation effects These


  1. Higgs Factory Studies etc. Work in progress aconway@fnal.gov 1

  2. Higgs Cross Section vs Beam Width ● Peak value of SM 125GeV Higgs Breit- Wigner convoluted with Gaussian beam. ● Does not include initial state radiation effects – These reduce the total cross section to about half (~52-58%) aconway@fnal.gov 2

  3. Machine Parameters ● 0.003% spread→ 2.65MeV at 125GeV ● Higgs x-section = 37.4pb with this spread ● 1x10^32/cm^2/s = 1x10^-5 pb^-1/s – = 1.7x10^2 pb^-1 / Snowmass year – → 6.4x10^3 Higgs/yr (on-peak) 3

  4. Higgs Signal vs Background ● No initial state radiation effects included. – Expected to increase background and decrease signal – Background here not used. ● R=0.003% (2.65MeV) beam smearing 4

  5. Higgs Signal vs Background ● Pythia-simulated backgrounds ● – Includes some form of initial state radiation, using default settings, unclear how accurate. ● Using these backgrounds for now. Good enough? ● Same backgrounds as spring report – Higgs cross sections slightly larger. 5

  6. Higgs Measurements ● Process: – Choose total luminosity, bin spacing, energy range ● Bin spacing = beam gaussian width ● Energy range = Higgs c.o.m. +/- 25MeV – Simulate data ● Poisson-distributed random numbers with <N> = (s + b)*L. – Fit to Breit-Wigner convoluted with Gaussian ● Free parameters: – Higgs mass, width, branching fractions ● Known values: – Beam width, integraged luminosity, background cross section 6

  7. Higgs Measurements ● Perfect b-tag and selective energy cuts – 52% signal, 15% of background – S/b = 1.3 ● Fit errors reflect accuracy to a decent degree – Could improve estimation with estimation of luminosity error. 7

  8. Higgs Measurements ● WW*: – Four-lepton decay; ~16% of h0 → WW* signal, 1.3pb – 0.015pb background – S/b ~= 85 ● Not as good for width measurement ● What figures to quote for uncertainty? 8

  9. Software and Computing Status ● Attempting to create/document working simulation and reconstruction environment. – https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/MCPDS/Simulation+and+Reconstruction ● Using: – Pythia (or other stdhep event generator) and MadGraph5 – SLIC detector simulation – ILCSoft reconstruction tools: PandoraPFA algorithms – Org.lcsim, JAS3 and NetBeans ● Port Steve Magill's dual-readout analysis tools for SiD to MCDRCal ● Set up environment on mcdrd machine for use ● Set up environment for submitting simulation jobs to GRID 9

  10. Software and Computing Status ● Pythia/MadGraph5 – Working fine – Instructions for generating accurate muon collider events would be good. ● SLIC – Getting warnings during simulations with new mcdrcal01, talking to Jeremy. – Simulated dataset had read error after one event. ● ILCSoft – ilcinstall scripts – slicPandora (package for PandoraPFA) doesn't build currently. – Generally somewhat tricky to get set up in a given environment. – Have identified some bugs and gotten them resolved. ● Org.lcsim, JAS3 et al. – Winter tutorial instructions still apply – Have not worked on Steve Magill's dual readout code yet. Will bring it to the mcd.analysis project on CVS ● GRID – Have not looked into it yet, but will probably take some work. GRID experts? – Will be necessary for full event simulaitons 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend