health impact evaluation hta in fi star
play

Health Impact Evaluation & HTA in FI-STAR Shahryar Eivazzadeh - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Health Impact Evaluation & HTA in FI-STAR Shahryar Eivazzadeh The Situation of Evaluation in Literature Aspects Efficacy Efficiency Safety Indicators Objective M&M KPIs Subjective QALY (q


  1. Health Impact Evaluation & HTA in FI-STAR Shahryar Eivazzadeh

  2. The Situation of Evaluation in Literature ● Aspects – Efficacy – Efficiency – Safety ● Indicators – Objective ● M&M ● KPIs – Subjective ● QALY (q uality-adjusted life year) – Method based – Template based ● EQ-5D ● SF-36 ● HTA – Favors RCT but also includes cohort studies – Decision oriented

  3. eHealth Evaluation Situation ● Absence of QALY (research gap) – Too deep? – What about others DALY, WTP, CUA, CER, …? ● Other KPIs

  4. HTA ● Beginning 70s ● Originated in the US, but left there there later ● Sweden was a pioneer in EU ● Future: “It is likely that HTA of the future will move more closely to the idea of comparative effectiveness ”

  5. Two approaches ● Subjective: – Patient related (such as) ● QALY – Method based – Template based ● EQ-5D ● SF-36 – Other stakeholders ... ● Objective: – KPIs – …

  6. Assessing Health Technologies ● Limitations: – Years after the intervention – The impacts cannot be attributed solely to the intervention ● Solution: – Focusing on leading indicators instead of lagging ones – Utilizing Bayesian methods, such as: ● EVSI (Expected Value of Sample Information) ● EVIU (Expected Value of Including Uncertainty )

  7. HTA “It is likely that HTA of the future will move more closely to the idea of comparative effectiveness ” (Banta & Jonsson 2009)

  8. … therefore changes in the KPIs are in focus ● change in Waiting times ● change in Average length of stay ● change in Number of patients in sections – Bed occupancy – ● change in Hospital acquired infections (HAI) ● change in Inpatient mortality rate ● …

  9. Mixing in levels 1. High level (such as QALY) 2. Health KPI level 3. Software KPIs

  10. Using Leading KPIs instead of Post- Intervention Evaluations Evaluation space by Evaluation space by Evaluation space by KPIs post-intervention evaluations post-intervention evaluations

  11. Safety in FI-STAR – Avoiding mis-information – Avoiding unreliable substitution – Being resilient in its critical mission ● To user input ● To environmental situations – Be replaceable – ...

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend