hcp costs amp coverage option 1 which 2 2m yr all numbers
play

HCP Costs & Coverage Option 1: Which $2.2M/Yr ALL NUMBERS ARE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HCP Costs & Coverage Option 1: Which $2.2M/Yr ALL NUMBERS ARE DELIBERATIVE Permits to Cover 88 functional acres/yr ESA Coverage Capital Facilities projects Public Services projects (Fire/Schools) Added accessory structures


  1. HCP Costs & Coverage Option 1: Which $2.2M/Yr ALL NUMBERS ARE DELIBERATIVE Permits to Cover 88 functional acres/yr ESA Coverage • Capital Facilities projects • Public Services projects (Fire/Schools) • Added accessory structures Commercial development Plats (short, large lot) • Temporary impacts Industrial development Subdivision • Individual single family lot owner development Potential Funding Sources: • $1.2M/YR = County (Conservation Futures) • $1M/YR = Mitigation Fees and/or other funding source *approximate per unit mitigation Rural $5,400/UGA $1,100 Median Home Cost 260,000 Mitigation $5,400 = 2.1% *weighted averages subject to change Rural = 1AC UGA =8,000SF

  2. HCP Costs & Coverage Option 2: Which ALL NUMBERS ARE DELIBERATIVE $3.5M/YR Permits to Cover 121 functional acres/YR ESA Coverage • Capital Facilities projects • Public Services projects (Fire/Schools) • Added accessory structures Plats (short, large lot) Commercial development • Temporary impacts Subdivision Industrial development • Individual single family lot owner development Potential Funding Sources: • $1.2M Conservation Futures Example cost: $1M • $1M Mitigation Fees and/or other funding source Mitigation Cost approximate *$1.3M Mitigation fees for *approximate per unit mitigation $12,000 larger developments Rural $5,400/UGA $1,100 .012% For single family homes

  3. Drawbacks $2.2M Scenario • Plats, subdivisions, commercial & industrial projects will not have streamlined permitting or predictability • Equitability question for legal review • Some liability under ESA will remain due to non coverage of certain activities • Changes require reworking take analysis. Not part of current contract. • Update to the contract to add new tasks and add adjust end date • Added money to contract to fund new tasks • Determination for where funds coming from to pay for new tasks (grant funding is entirely obligated) • Add time over all HCP process (minimum 120 days from end date of current contract) • UGA increases not accommodated • More minimization measures would be required

  4. Drawbacks $3.5M Scenario • Plats, subdivisions, commercial & industrial projects will not have streamlined permitting or predictability • Equitability question for legal review • Some liability under ESA will remain due to non coverage of certain activities • Changes require reworking take analysis. Not part of current contract. • Update to the contract to add new tasks and add adjust end date • Added money to contract to fund new tasks • Determination for where funds coming from to pay for new tasks (current grant funding is entirely obligated) • Add time over all HCP process (minimum 120 days from end date of current contract) • Less flexibility to accommodate UGA increases • More minimization measures would be required

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend