Habitat selection at fine spatial scales: How consistent is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

habitat selection at fine spatial scales
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Habitat selection at fine spatial scales: How consistent is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Habitat selection at fine spatial scales: How consistent is microclimate between the breeding and wintering grounds of Neotropical migrant passerines? Michael A. Patten, Brenda D. Smith-Patten, and Jeff F. Kelly University of Oklahoma, Norman,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Michael A. Patten, Brenda D. Smith-Patten, and Jeff F. Kelly University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA

Habitat selection at fine spatial scales:

How consistent is microclimate between the breeding and wintering grounds of Neotropical migrant passerines?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Correlates of extinction risk

Patten & Smith-Patten (2011, Conservation Biology 25:1203–1211)

Persistence or extirpation?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A key potential reason is altered microclimate; e.g.:

  • higher temperature
  • stronger wind
  • increased light
  • lower humidity (i.e.,

desiccation)

Mechanisms?

Patten & Smith-Patten (2011, Conservation Biology 25:1203–1211)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

La Milpa Field Station, Belize Las Cruces Biological Station, Costa Rica (n = 129 plots) (n = 103 plots)

Residents

slide-5
SLIDE 5

mini weather station

Methods

light meter ambient temperature, relative humidity, heat index, wind speed, light intensity

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Canonical Correspondence Analysis

 A multivariate ordination technique.

 orders sites along environmental gradients  like other ordinations in the CA family, also orders

species across the gradient

 A type of direct ordination.

 environmental variables are included in the analysis  in the case of CCA, environmental variables are used in

an associated multiple regression to constrain the algorithm that orders the sites (and species)

 Produces a biplot that shows how the environmental

variables relate to the ordering of sites (or species).

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Drivers of Assemblage Structure

Canonical Variate I

  • 1

1 2 3

Canonical Variate II

  • 1

1

VPD light temp canopy wind Las Cruces Canonical Variate I

  • 1

1 2

Canonical Variate II

  • 2
  • 1

1

VPD light temp canopy wind La Milpa

Patten & Smith-Patten (2012, Biological Conservation 155:85–93)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Light Mattered Most . . .

Patten & Smith-Patten (2012, Biological Conservation 155:85–93)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

“We emphasize the need to consider how individuals move and interact with their environment throughout their annual cycle and over hemispheric scales.” – Renfrew et al. (2013, Diversity and Distributions 19:in press)

What about Migrants?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ouachita National Forest, Oklahoma (La Milpa, n = 86 plots; Hill Bank, n = 16 plots) (n = 28 plots)

Migrants

Rio Bravo Conservation and Management Area, Belize

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Focal Species

Kentucky Warbler

Geothlypis formosa

Black-and-white Warbler

Mniotilta varia

White-eyed Vireo

Vireo griseus

Hooded Warbler

Setophaga citrina

Red-eyed Vireo

Vireo olivaceus

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Calculate means of microclimate variables
  • wind speed (m/s)
  • ambient temperature (ºC)
  • vapor pressure density (humidity)
  • canopy cover (%)
  • light penetration (kLux)
  • heat index – although highly correlated with temperature . . .

for occupied plots vs. available plots on both the breeding grounds and the wintering grounds.

  • Calculate ratios of occupied to available for each variable

(ratios within ±0.25 of 1.0 suggest no effect).

  • Compare ratios for breeding and wintering grounds.

Analysis

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results

canopy temperature VPD heat index wind light available 61.4 22.2 0.55 23.6 0.37 2.21

  • ccupied

49.2 24.2 0.68 26.5 0.81 3.37 ratio 0.80 1.09 1.23 1.12 2.17 1.53 White-eyed Vireo

Vireo griseus

canopy temperature VPD heat index wind light available 67.1 25.3 1.34 26.0 0.34 3.86

  • ccupied

69.1 25.5 1.50 26.1 0.58 5.23 ratio 1.03 1.01 1.12 1.01 1.68 1.35

wintering grounds breeding grounds

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results

species VPD wind light winter breed winter breed winter breed White-eyed Vireo 2.17 1.68 1.53 1.35 Black-and-white Warbler 0.58 0.57 0.58 Kentucky Warbler 0.74 0.70 0.45 0.25 0.48 Red-eyed Vireo 0.40 0.50 0.62 Hooded Warbler 1.36 1.34

No signal for canopy cover, ambient temperature, or heat index.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results

species VPD wind light winter breed winter breed winter breed White-eyed Vireo 2.17 1.68 1.53 1.35 Black-and-white Warbler 0.58 0.57 0.58 Kentucky Warbler 0.74 0.70 0.45 0.25 0.48 Red-eyed Vireo 0.40 0.50 0.62 Hooded Warbler 1.36 1.34 1.14

No signal for canopy cover, ambient temperature, or heat index.

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Microclimate attributes are important aspects of habitat

selection.

  • The extent of light penetration is the key microclimate

variable.

  • Boreal migrants occupy similar light environments on their

wintering grounds as on the breeding grounds.

  • Preference for high or low light environments varies across

species.

  • White-eyed Vireo – high (forages in lower strata)
  • Black-and-white Warbler – low (mid-levels, but near trunks)
  • Kentucky Warbler – very low (largely terrestrial)

Summary

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Preservation or restoration of the light environment ought to be a major goal of conservation efforts for boreal migrants (and tropical resident) species of birds.

Conclusion

slide-18
SLIDE 18