Group1 Geosciences Projects Rapid response geophysical survey in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

group1 geosciences
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Group1 Geosciences Projects Rapid response geophysical survey in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

J-Rapid Symposium Flash Japon Sendai, 6-7 March 2013 Group1 Geosciences Projects Rapid response geophysical survey in the fault zone. Sh. Kodaira and G. Moore (U.S.A.) Urgent surveys for evacuation measures from unextpected large


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Group1 Geosciences

J-Rapid Symposium Flash Japon Sendai, 6-7 March 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Projects

  • Rapid response geophysical survey in the fault zone. Sh.

Kodaira and G. Moore (U.S.A.)

  • Urgent surveys for evacuation measures from unextpected

large tsunami . K. Satake and H. Harjono (Indonesia)

  • Evaluation potential of large aftershocks. Yo Fukushima P.

Segall (U.S.)

  • DYNTOHOKU. S. Ide and R. Madariaga (France)
  • Tohoku Oki from Earth to Oceans and Space Sh Watada and A.

Sladen (France)

  • Crustal seismic velocity changes and deformation T. Nishimua

and F. Brenguier (France)

  • Paleoseismology and paleotsunamis of the NE Japan

subduction zone. Sh. Toda and M. Meghraoui (France)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Major questions about the Tohoku earthquake

  • 1. Why was it unexpected?
  • 2. What did actually happen and will happen?
  • 3. Why did it grow to be so big?
  • 4. How can we better observe future

mega-thrust earthquakes ?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interpretation of Historical seismicity of Tohoku

Abe et Kanamori et al, 1970s Expected Earthquake M~8 http://www.j-shis.bosai.go.jp/map, ca. 2010

Why did we not expect it?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Simulation of a possible tsunami source based on Jogan Earthquake of 869

Minoura et al, 2001

Improved paleoseismology Toda and Meghraoui

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What did actually happen?

Nishimura et al, 2011-13 Slip on the fault Fujii-Satake, 2011 Tsunami height

Satake Harjono Many

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What did actually happen?

The source of high frequencies is not the same as the source of low frequencies.

Ide and Madariaga Satake Harjono (Nishimura Brenguier)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What did actually happened and will happen?

From Roger Bilham, http://cires.colorado.edu/~bilham/Honshu2011/Honshu2011.html Coseismic (120 s) Post seismic (10 years?) Inter-seismic (>1000 years)

Geodesy

local

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 1. What did actually happen and what will happen ?

We only have 20 years of geodetic data for an earthquake that took at least 1000 to prepare. And we can only observe in the surface. Fukushima Segall classical and modern geodesy Ide Madariaga GPS near and far field Nishimura Brenguier local GPS Toda Meghraoui coastal deformation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why did it grow to be so big?

Kodaira and G.F. Moore Ide and Madariaga

Affects rupture process (Ide+Madariaga) Affects tsunami generation (Satake+Harjono Watada+Sladen)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How can we better observe future mega-thrust earthquakes ?

Use space observations: infrasounds, GPS observed in the upper atmosphere, etc Watada-Sladen Detect velocity changes using seismological methods (coda waves, noise crosscorrelations)

  • T. Nishimura, F. Brenguier