BHATE Geosciences Corporation SUE Investigation: ALDOT Central - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bhate geosciences corporation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BHATE Geosciences Corporation SUE Investigation: ALDOT Central - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BHATE Geosciences Corporation SUE Investigation: ALDOT Central Business District Bridge Replacement on I-59/I-20 from I-65 to 31 st St Project Number: IM-1059 October 29, 2014 ALDOT - Central Business District I-59/I-20 from I-65 to 31 st Street


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BHATE Geosciences Corporation

SUE Investigation: ALDOT Central Business District Bridge Replacement on I-59/I-20 from I-65 to 31st St

Project Number: IM-1059

October 29, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ALDOT - Central Business District

I-59/I-20 from I-65 to 31st Street Birmingham, Alabama

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CBD Project Summary

  • ALDOT is planning bridges along Interstate 59/20

through the City of Birmingham’s Central Business District (CBD).

  • As part of the restructuring and rerouting and proposed

new construction, detailed information on subsurface utilities was required for the planning and design.

  • The work includes approximately 1.5 miles of roadway

and bridge widening on I-59/I-20 and I-65

  • Approximately 32 new bridges/ramps/bridge widening
  • Additionally, improvements to the I-59/20/31st Street

North interchange, and the I-59/20.US 31(Red Mountain Expressway) interchange are planned.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Utility Verification Prior to Borings

  • Geotechnical drilling included nearly 500 boring

locations performed by multiple consultants

  • CBD is a highly urbanized and developed area

(since late 1800’s) with multitude of utilities. It was necessary to verify that the proposed boring locations were free of subsurface high value utilities

  • This area consisted of gas, telephone, fiber-optic

cables and other sensitive targets that could be significantly disrupted and impacted in case of damage during field exploration.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CBD Boring Locations

BHATE provided pre-drilling SUE services to locate the utilities and clear boring locations to manage subsurface conflicts and reduce risk of potential damage.

Approximately 500 boring locations scanned

Nearly 20% of the borings were impacted by subsurface utilities and had to be shifted.

O R O O R R

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CBD Boring Locations

 Used geophysical methods to clear safe boring

locations

  • Ground penetrating radar (GPR)
  • Cable and pipe locators
  • Note: Differences noted at numerous locations

between actual and One Call marked utilities.

 After scanning and relocation of the borings

where conflicts were indicated, 100% of scanned borings were safely drilled.

 Considerable potential cost savings in regards to

interruptions in service and/or utility repair had this scanning not been done prior to commencing

  • drilling. Information from available records and

One-Call could not be completely relied upon.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ALDOT Phase Prioritization

 Phase I: 31st Street North and 12th Avenue North  Phase 2: I-59/I-20 and I-65 Interchange  Phase 3: 12th Court North  Phase 4: CBD Interchange Ramps  Phase 5: CBD Bridge Demo and Replacement

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Why SUE???

 Preconstruction Planning

  • Utility-related problems are a leading cause of delays

that occur during the construction phase of highway projects (FHWA-IF-02-048)

 Cost Management

  • For small fraction of total construction costs, initial SUE

investigation can save significant costs caused by delays, repairs, change orders etc.

 Utilities management

  • Accurately determine existing utilities and as-built

conditions and depths

  • Address conflicts during design stage
  • Replace/relocate discussions with utility companies

prior to final design completion

 Avoid risks

  • Damage to utilities
  • Repairs
  • Disruptions in service

 Safety

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ALDOT SUE Objectives

 “ALDOT realizes utility identification, relocation

and management is critical information for project design and to give to the contractor”

 Want nothing to slow or disrupt progress  Can’t stand any surprises!  “That is why ALDOT is going through this effort

and have seen significant value in the SUE process for the CBD project”

  • Mr. Steve Walker, P.E. ROW- Engineer
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Procedure for Accomplishing Field Work General Outline

 Four (4) main utility data quality levels established

by American Society of Civil Engineers' Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data – ASCE 38-02

 Provides a means of obtaining a professional

  • pinion of the quality and reliability of utility

information

 Utility Quality Levels

  • QL-D
  • QL-C
  • QL-B
  • QL-A
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Procedure for Accomplishing CBD Field Work

 Records Research- QL-D – First Step

  • Gather and review available drawings and
  • records. Included historical archives going

back to late 1800’s.

  • Obtain available as-built information from

Utilities, Alabama Gas, Alabama Power, Birmingham Waterworks etc.

  • Preliminary assessment of the types of

utilities present in the area and their likely location and depth.

  • ATT will not provide information – only

confirm if there is a conflict with a proposed construction activity

 Field Observation- QL-C – Second Step

  • Visually inspect available surface

indicators

  • Verify approximate depth and alignment
  • f utilities present based on surface

features

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Geophysical Investigation- QL-B

  • Application of surface geophysical methods to

determine the existence and position of utilities.

  • Ground penetrating radar (GPR)
  • Ferromagnetic Locators
  • RD 7000 cable and pipe locators
  • One Call locating services are also used.

However, we often find discrepancies in lines located by these agencies and actual field conditions.

SUE Level B Field Work

This included in-situ verification of utilities using GPR and other NDT methods

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SUE ‘Level B’ Field Equipment

 Ground-Penetrating Radar– multiple SIR 3000 utility carts by GSSI. Multiple antenna frequencies available.  Multi-channel GPR system - a 14-channel- cart-based ground penetrating radar unit that is typically towed behind a vehicle during survey operations.  Optical Equipment- using visible light as an electromagnetic method. For example, using a laser through a pipe from one vault to another. FLIR ThermaCAM EX320 infrared cameras  RD7000 cable and pipe locators and Tx transmitter - induces a frequency into a buried pipe or cable and allows the user trace out the alignment of the utility on the ground surface  Ferro magnetic locators- locating and pinpointing buried metal objects such as manholes and metallic pipes

slide-14
SLIDE 14

 Actual Exposure- QL-A

 This level was implemented in limited areas where

Level B information was limited and high risk underground utilities required in-place exposure and verification of type and depths.

  • Highest level of accuracy available
  • Nondestructive exposure of underground utilities
  • Employed

minimally intrusive excavation equipment (vacuum extraction) to minimize the potential for utility damage

  • Type, size, depth, and location of utilities were

recorded and used to verify provided information

  • Depth of exposure ranged from 3’ to 5’

Level ‘A’ Field Work

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SUE Process Workflow

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CBD Bridge Demolition and Replacement

  • I-59/I-20 and I-65 Interchange - Findings
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Site Specific Findings

I-59/I-20 and I-65 Interchange

 Records Review QL-D - Sanborn Maps

and other sources revealed:

  • Oil Refinery
  • Dry Cleaners
  • Birmingham Electric Co.

 Foundry, Machine Shop, Storage Yard  10-15 Tanks were identified  Multitude of old utilities – it was

unknown which utilities were abandoned.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Site Specific Findings

I-59/I-20 and I-65 Interchange

QL-D and QL-C investigation uncovered numerous inconsistencies.

Utility records from Alabama Power, Jefferson County Environmental Services and Water Works did not match in- field conditions. Manhole covers not found in the field but present on the utility records.

Information on abandoned and active utilities was not clearly documented and would require further verification.

Utilities marked in the field by One-Call were not consistent with the records provided by utilities.

Level B SUE work is pending and will be implemented in this area and supplemented by Level A, as necessary.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CBD Bridge Demolition and Replacement

  • 23rd Street to 31st Street North Section -

Findings

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Site Specific Findings

23rd Street to 31st Street North

 QL-D and QL-C also uncovered discrepancies

  • Historical records as well as Sanborn maps indicated
  • ld gas stations, a railroad yard with multiple tracks

etc.

  • Utility records and surface features indicated that

the drawings provided by utility companies did not accurately reflect in-ground conditions.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Site Specific Findings

23rd Street to 31st Street North

 QL-B investigation was performed to verify the location

  • f buried utilities beneath proposed CBD bridge

alignment

  • Identified locations of buried railroad tracks. These

were covered up by existing pavement with no visible signs on the surface.

  • The entire area was mapped in detail at each
  • intersection. Numerous undocumented underground

utilities were found.

  • Discrepancies between utility drawings and actual

locations were resolved. Conflicts between actually existing utilities and proposed construction were identified.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CBD Bridge Demolition and Replacement

 9th Ave from 15th St to 23rd St – Findings

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Site Specific Findings

9th Ave from 15th St to 23rd St

 QL-D and QL-C investigation revealed various discrepancies.

  • Utility records and as built drawings of sewer, electrical, water,

gas, steam, etc., were inconsistent with in-field surface indicators.

 QL-B investigation was performed to verify the location of

buried utilities beneath the proposed CBD bridge alignment

  • The entire area of interest was mapped in detail. Numerous

underground utilities were verified at each intersection and right of way.

  • Conflicts between actually existing utilities and proposed

construction were identified.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Site Specific Findings

9th Ave from 15th St to 23rd St

 QL-A was performed on a 115 KV oil-cooled electrical

transmission line and 30 inch main water line

 Actual location, depth, material and condition was

verified for the proposed CBD construction plans.

 Further QL-A was needed and currently in progress

along 9th Ave. N

slide-25
SLIDE 25

QL-A Along 9th Avenue North

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Data Management Procedure

 Upon completion of QL-B and QL-A, Volkert surveyed the

alignment and depth of target utilities identified and marked in the field by BHATE. Deliverables included the following:

  • Plan/Profile sheets and Cross Sections showing utility

locations.

  • Depict information using ALDOT CADD Standards and Plan

Preparation Manual.

  • Developed a conflict matrix showing all possible known utility

conflicts with the proposed construction.

 The findings are reviewed with ALDOT for Impact Assessment.  Areas selected for further exploration using Level A assessment.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary

 BHATE mapped the location of utilities using a

combination

  • f

provided drawings from utility companies and historical research.

 Compared the results of the subsurface utility survey to

the field features and drawings to validate the available information and resolve differences in the information from QL-D, QL-C and QL-B.

 When necessary, conducted additional searches and

performed field operations to clear discrepancies between records and subsurface survey.

 When necessary, exposed selected subsurface utilities

to obtain three-dimensional information using minimally invasive methods. QL-A. Resolve discrepancies and update drawings.

 The SUE process implemented for the CBD project

revealed information that was undocumented

  • r

unknown and will now significantly aid in the final design, conflict resolution with underground utilities or remnants from other developments in this area over the past 100+ years.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

BHATE Team on the CBD SUE Project

 Uday R. Bhate, P.E., Senior Principal  Marc Langlois, P.G., Senior SUE Manager  Jeremiah Bishop, M.S., Project Manager  Jordan Middleton, B.S.C.E., Manager Field Services  Chuck Grostick, B.S., Certified Senior GPR/SUE Technician  Sarah Samples, Project Information Coordinator

slide-29
SLIDE 29

SUE Resources and Reference Documents

 FHWA-Utility Relocation and Accommodation on

Federal-Aid Highway Projects- January 2003

  • Provides Guidelines and Basis for:

 Utility Accommodation  Utility Relocations, Adjustments and Reimbursements  Communication of Utility Data  Risk and Impact Analysis  Cost Estimate Procedures  Other Issues

 ASCE Standard CI/ASCE 38-02

  • Quality Levels in Subsurface Utility Engineering as a

Basis for:

  • Accurate Knowledge of Horizontal and Vertical Location
  • Data Management and Depiction of Utilities on

Construction Plans Prior to Excavation

  • Design Around Underground Utilities to Avoid Costly

Relocations

 ALDOT Utilities Manual

slide-30
SLIDE 30

QUESTIONS???