GROUP WASTEWATER DIVISION VANESSA D. WISHART STAFFORD ROSENBAUM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

group wastewater division
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GROUP WASTEWATER DIVISION VANESSA D. WISHART STAFFORD ROSENBAUM - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP WASTEWATER DIVISION VANESSA D. WISHART STAFFORD ROSENBAUM LLP 222 WEST WASHINGTON AVENUE, SUITE 900 P.O. BOX 1784 MADISON, WI 53701-1784 VWISHART@STAFFORDLAW.COM SPEAKERS TASK FORCE ON WATER QUALITY


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP – WASTEWATER DIVISION

VANESSA D. WISHART STAFFORD ROSENBAUM LLP 222 WEST WASHINGTON AVENUE, SUITE 900 P.O. BOX 1784 MADISON, WI 53701-1784 VWISHART@STAFFORDLAW.COM SPEAKER’S TASK FORCE ON WATER QUALITY PUBLIC HEARING – JULY 11, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WHO WE ARE

  • MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION OF APPROXIMATELY 100 SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED WASTEWATER

TREATMENT FACILITIES

  • LOCATED THROUGHOUT WISCONSIN
  • ESTABLISHED OVER 31 YEARS AGO
  • WE ADVOCATE FOR MUNICIPALITIES IN THE DNR RULEMAKING PROCESS AND AT THE LEGISLATURE
  • OUR MEMBERS SERVE KEY FUNCTIONS:
  • ENGAGE IN THE CRITICAL PUBLIC FUNCTION OF WATER RECLAMATION
  • ACCEPT AND TREAT SEPTAGE FROM PRIVATE WASTEWATER SYSTEMS
  • PARTNER WITH NONPOINT SOURCES SUCH AS AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS TO REDUCE POLLUTION
  • EDUCATE AND REGULATE COMMUNITIES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE PROBLEM WASTE STREAMS
slide-3
SLIDE 3

WHO WE ARE

  • MEG WAS INTEGRAL TO A NUMBER OF KEY

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS:

  • CREATION OF THE MULTI-DISCHARGE VARIANCE

FOR PHOSPHORUS

  • IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CLEAN WATER FUND

INTEREST PROGRAM

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WISCONSIN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

  • THERE ARE 641 MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS IN

WISCONSIN WIDELY RANGING IN SIZE

slide-5
SLIDE 5

MARSHFIELD PLANT

slide-6
SLIDE 6

FOND DU LAC PLANT

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CITY OF RACINE PLANT

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS

  • FRONT LINE IN PROTECTING WATER QUALITY
  • MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CONSIST OF TWO MAIN PARTS:
  • COLLECTION SYSTEMS – THE PIPES THAT CARRY WASTE FROM INDIVIDUAL

CONNECTIONS

  • TREATMENT PLANTS – TREAT THE WASTE AND DISCHARGE CLEAN WATER
slide-9
SLIDE 9

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

  • THE TREATMENT PROCESS INVOLVES SEVERAL STEPS:
  • PRIMARY AND SECONDARY TREATMENT
  • EMPLOYS SETTLING AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES TO BREAK DOWN WASTE
  • DISINFECTION
  • IN MANY CASES, TERTIARY TREATMENT OR FILTERS
  • FURTHER REDUCES SOLIDS, NUTRIENTS, AND OTHER CONSTITUENTS
  • THE TREATMENT PROCESS GENERATES SOLIDS RICH IN NUTRIENTS THAT ARE

TYPICALLY LAND APPLIED

slide-10
SLIDE 10

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

  • MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS TREAT A VARIETY OF

WASTES:

  • HOUSEHOLD SANITARY WASTE
  • COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE
  • HAULED WASTE FROM PRIVATE SEPTAGE SYSTEMS
slide-11
SLIDE 11

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

  • MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS ARE REQUIRED TO HOLD WPDES

PERMITS ISSUED BY DNR

  • INCLUDE NUMERIC LIMITS FOR CONSTITUENTS DISCHARGED IN

WASTEWATER

  • LIMITS ARE DESIGNED TO PROTECT WATER QUALITY, PUBLIC HEALTH, FISH AND

WILDLIFE

  • MUNICIPALITIES MUST TEST THE WATER BEING DISCHARGED DAILY IN

CERTIFIED LABS AND REPORT THE RESULTS TO DNR

slide-12
SLIDE 12

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

  • SEPARATE SEWER SYSTEMS
  • ALL MUNICIPALITIES EXCEPT FOR

MILWAUKEE AND SUPERIOR NOW HAVE SEPARATE STORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS:

THINKING OUTSIDE THE FENCE

  • TREATMENT PLANTS WERE DESIGNED TO REMOVE CERTAIN CONSTITUENTS
  • SOLIDS, NUTRIENTS, AND BACTERIA
  • TREATMENT PLANTS ARE NOT DESIGNED TO REMOVE CHEMICALS
  • CERTAIN CHEMICALS, SUCH AS MERCURY AND CHLORIDES, CANNOT BE

TREATED THROUGH CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT METHODS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS:

THINKING OUTSIDE THE FENCE

  • RELIANCE ON REDUCING SOURCES OF POLLUTANTS
  • MERCURY: MUNICIPALITIES WORK WITH DENTAL OFFICES TO LIMIT USE OF

MERCURY AND REDUCE MERCURY CONTAINING WASTE BEING PLACED INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM

  • CHLORIDES: MUNICIPALITIES WORK WITH COMMUNITIES TO REDUCE SOURCES

OF SALT FROM WATER SOFTENERS AND ROAD SALT

  • AS NEW CONTAMINANTS EMERGE, THESE TYPES OF SOURCE

REDUCTION AND POLLUTANT MINIMIZATION PROGRAMS WILL BECOME MORE CRITICAL

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS:

MANAGING STORMWATER

  • SOME SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS STILL EXPERIENCE “OVERFLOWS” IN

MAJOR STORM EVENTS

  • TYPICALLY CAUSED BY INFILTRATION AND INFLOW OF STORMWATER INTO THE

SANITARY SYSTEM

  • SOMETIMES FROM CRACKS IN SEWER PIPES AND JOINTS OR MANHOLES
  • DNR REQUIRES ALL MUNICIPALITIES TO INSTITUTE PROGRAMS TO LIMIT

INFILTRATION AND INFLOW

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS: MANAGING STORMWATER

  • CONTINUED CONCERNS WITH INFILTRATION AND INFLOW
  • INFILTRATION FROM SEWER LATERALS THAT ARE ON INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY AND OUTSIDE OF

THE CONTROL OF THE MUNICIPALITY

  • INTENSITY AND FREQUENCY OF STORM EVENTS
  • SEWERS ARE DESIGNED AT CAPACITY ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN AMOUNTS OF

INFILTRATION

  • AS INTENSITY AND FREQUENCY OF SIGNIFICANT STORM EVENTS HAS INCREASED, ISSUES

ASSOCIATED WITH INFILTRATION HAVE ALSO INCREASED

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS:

POINT VS. NON-POINT POLLUTION CONTROL

  • DIRECT DISCHARGES SUCH AS MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS ARE “POINT

SOURCES”

  • REQUIRE WPDES PERMITS
  • NUMERIC LIMITS ARE EASIER TO REGULATE THESE SOURCES
  • DIFFUSE SOURCES OF POLLUTION ARE “NONPOINT SOURCES”
  • GENERALLY NOT SUBJECT TO PERMITS OR NUMERIC LIMITS
  • EXCEPTIONS INCLUDE STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM LARGE COMMUNITIES AND

DISCHARGES FROM CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFOS)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS:

POINT VS. NON-POINT POLLUTION CONTROL

  • WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS FROM POINT SOURCES HAVE

BEEN SIGNIFICANT

  • MUNICIPAL TREATMENT SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO REDUCE

PHOSPHORUS SINCE 1991

  • HAVE REDUCED DISCHARGES BY OVER 90%
  • MOST OF REMAINING SURFACE WATER IMPAIRMENT DUE TO

PHOSPHORUS COMES FROM RUNOFF

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS:

COST OF MAINTAINING INFRASTRUCTURE

  • MOST CITIES IN WISCONSIN HAVE HAD SEWER TREATMENT PLANTS FOR 100

YEARS OR MORE

  • THIS AGING INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS TO BE REPLACED
  • COSTS CONTINUE TO MOUNT
  • POPULATION AND INDUSTRY DEMAND REQUIRE LARGER SYSTEMS AND INCREASED

CAPACITY

  • INCREASED REGULATORY DEMANDS REQUIRE NEW TREATMENT, NEW TESTING

AND REPORTING, AND NEW PROGRAMS

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CHALLENGES FOR MUNICIPAL TREATMENT PLANTS:

COST OF MAINTAINING INFRASTRUCTURE

  • UPGRADING OR EXPANDING INFRASTRUCTURE IS EXPENSIVE AND COMPLEX
  • PIPES ARE UNDERGROUND AND OUT OF SITE - DIFFICULT TO DIAGNOSE AND

REPAIR/REPLACE

  • BUDGETING IS CHALLENGING, ESPECIALLY IN SMALL TO MEDIUM SIZED COMMUNITIES
  • MANY COMMUNITIES LACK THE POPULATION OR TAX BASE TO AFFORD UPGRADES
  • THE CLEAN WATER FUND
  • FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES, USUALLY DOES NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SUPPORT
slide-21
SLIDE 21

HTTPS://MEGWASTEWATER.ORG/